[go: nahoru, domu]

Talk:Radical constructivism: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎Merge: Reply
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Undid revision 1236682333 by 176.1.12.197 (talk)
 
Line 6:
 
I'd like to suggest that the content here be moved to [[social constructionism]]. It seems better served as a redirect to that article and the content as a section in that article. -[[User:Sethmahoney|Seth Mahoney]] 07:54, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 
:Izabela Iva Izabela [[Special:Contributions/176.1.12.197|176.1.12.197]] ([[User talk:176.1.12.197|talk]]) 01:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
 
Radical constructivism really has not much to do with social constructivism. In the radical approach even the existence of social systems ultimately is not verifiable. I redirect to [[Constructivist epistemology]], because that's at least more general, including both radical and social constructivism. The article there is not exactly perfect, but it's much better than it used to be, while the paragraph on radical constructivism in [[social constructionism]] is absolutely sub-standard.