[go: nahoru, domu]

Tibeto-Burman languages: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m →‎Overview: The original wording was that the researchers "discovered" these endangered languages. The correction is because these are still living languages, even though they are both endangered or remote. A language cannot be "discovered" if there are still people who speak it.
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 59:
The link between Tibeto-Burman and Chinese is now accepted by most linguists, with a few exceptions such as [[Roy Andrew Miller]] and [[Christopher I. Beckwith|Christopher Beckwith]].{{sfnp|Miller|1974}}{{sfnp|Beckwith|1996}}{{sfnp|Beckwith|2002}}
More recent controversy has centred on the proposed primary branching of Sino-Tibetan into Chinese and Tibeto-Burman subgroups.
In spite of the popularity of this classification, first proposed by Kuhn and Conrady, and also promoted by [[Paul K. Benedict|Paul Benedict]] (1972) and later [[James Matisoff]], Tibeto-Burman has not been demonstrated to be a valid familysubgroup in its own right.{{sfnp|Handel|2008|p=431}}
 
== Overview ==
Most of the Tibeto-Burman languages are spoken in remote mountain areas, which has hampered their study by outside researchers. Many lack a written standard.
It is generally easier to identify a language as Tibeto-Burman than to determine its precise relationship with other languages of the group.{{sfnp|Handel|2008|pp=424–432}}
The subgroupings that have been established with certainty number several dozen, ranging from well-studied groups of dozens of languages with millions of speakers to several [[language isolate|isolate]]s, some of which were only recently observed bydiscovered outsidein researchers.the These21st languagescentury arebut in danger of extinction.{{sfnp|van Driem|2011a}}
These subgroups are here surveyed on a geographical basis.
 
Line 112:
Shafer's tentative classification took an agnostic position and did not recognize Tibeto-Burman, but placed Chinese (Sinitic) on the same level as the other branches of a Sino-Tibetan family.{{sfnp|Shafer|1955}} He retained Tai–Kadai (Daic) within the family, allegedly at the insistence of colleagues, despite his personal belief that they were not related.
 
{{tree list}}
; Sino-Tibetan
:* I.'''Sino-Tibetan'''
** ''[[Sinitic languages|Sinitic]]''
: II.** ?? ''[[Tai–Kadai languages|Daic]]''
: III.** ''Bodic''
::a.*** Bodish ([[Tamangic languages|Gurung]], [[Tshangla language|Tshangla]], [[Rgyalrongic languages|Gyarong]], [[Tibetic languages|Tibetic]])
::b.*** [[West Himalayish languages|West Himalayish]] (incl. [[Thangmi language|Thangmi]], [[Baram language|Baram]], [[Raji–Raute languages|Raji–Raute]])
::c.*** West Central Himalayish ([[Magaric languages|Magar]], [[Chepangic languages|Chepang]], [[Wayu language|Hayu]] [misplaced])
::d.*** [[Kiranti languages|East Himalayish]]
::e.*** [[Newar language|Newarish]]
::f.*** [[Digarish languages|Digarish]]
::g.*** [[Midzu languages|Midźuish]]
::h.*** [[Hruso languages|Hruish]]
::i.*** [[Dhimal languages|Dhimalish]]
::j.*** [[Tani languages|Miśingish]]
::k.*** [[Qiangic languages|Dzorgaish]]
** ''Burmic''
 
*** [[Lolo-Burmese languages|Burmish]]
: IV. ''Burmic''
*** [[Mru language|Mruish]]
::a. [[Lolo-Burmese languages|Burmish]]
::b.*** [[MruNungish languagelanguages|MruishNungish]]
*** Katśinish ([[Jingpho language|Jingpho]])
::c. [[Nungish languages|Nungish]]
*** Tśairelish
::d. Katśinish ([[Jingpho language|Jingpho]])
*** [[Luish languages|Luish]]
::e. Tśairelish
*** Taman
::f. [[Luish languages|Luish]]
*** [[Kukish languages|Kukish]]
::g. Taman
** ''Baric''
::h. [[Kukish languages|Kukish]]
*** [[Boro–Garo languages|Barish]]
: V. ''Baric''
*** Nagish
::a. [[Boro–Garo languages|Barish]]
** ''[[Karen languages|Karenic]]''
::b. Nagish
{{tree list/end}}
: VI. ''[[Karen languages|Karenic]]''
 
===Benedict (1972)===
A very influential, although also tentative, classification is that of {{harvtxt|Benedict|1972}}, which was actually written around 1941. Like Shafer's work, this drew on the data assembled by the Sino-Tibetan Philology Project, which was directed by Shafer and Benedict in turn. Benedict envisaged Chinese as the first family to branch off, followed by Karen.
 
{{tree list}}
:Sino-Tibetan
*Sino-Tibetan
:# Chinese
** Chinese
:# Tibeto-Karen
:#** Tibeto-Karen
*** Karen
:#* '''Tibeto-Burman'''
*** '''Tibeto-Burman'''
{{tree list/end}}
 
The Tibeto-Burman family is then divided into seven primary branches:
 
{{tree list}}
I. ''[[Tibeto-Kanauri languages|Tibetan–Kanauri]]'' (a.k.a. Bodish–Himalayish)
* '''Tibeto-Burman'''
: A. Bodish
::** ''[[Tibeto-Kanauri languages|Tibetan–Kanauri]]'' (a.k.a. Bodish–Himalayish)
*** Bodish
**** ([[Tibetic languages|Tibetic]], [[Jiarong languages|Gyarung]], [[East Bodish languages|Takpa]], [[Tshangla language|Tsangla]], [[Tamangic languages|Murmi & Gurung]])
: B.*** Himalayish
:: i.**** "major" [[West Himalayish languages|Himalayish]]
:: ii.**** "minor" [[West Himalayish languages|Himalayish]]
:::***** (Rangkas, Darmiya, Chaudangsi, Byangsi)
::*** (perhaps also [[Qiangic languages|Dzorgai]], [[Lepcha language|Lepcha]], [[Magaric languages|Magari]])
** ''[[Kiranti languages|Bahing–Vayu]]''
 
*** Bahing ([[Sunuwar language|Sunuwar]], [[Khaling language|Khaling]])
II. ''[[Kiranti languages|Bahing–Vayu]]''
:*** A.[[Sampang Bahinglanguage|Sampang]], ([[SunuwarBantawa language|SunuwarRungchenbung]], [[KhalingYakha language|Yakha]], and [[Limbu language|KhalingLimbu]])
*** [[Wayu language|Vayu]]–[[Chepangic languages|Chepang]]
: B. Khambu ([[Sampang language|Sampang]], [[Bantawa language|Rungchenbung]], [[Yakha language|Yakha]], and [[Limbu language|Limbu]])
:*** C.(perhaps also [[WayuNewar language|Vayu]]–[[Chepangic languages|ChepangNewar]])
** ''[[Tani languages|Abor–Miri–Dafla]]''
:(perhaps also [[Newar language|Newar]])
*** (perhaps also [[Hruso languages|Aka]], [[Digaro languages|Digaro]], [[Midzu languages|Miju]], and [[Dhimal languages|Dhimal]])
 
III.** ''[[TaniJingpho languageslanguage|Abor–Miri–DaflaKachin]]''
*** (perhaps including [[Sak languages|Luish]])
:(perhaps also [[Hruso languages|Aka]], [[Digaro languages|Digaro]], [[Midzu languages|Miju]], and [[Dhimal languages|Dhimal]])
** ''[[Lolo–Burmese languages|Burmese–Lolo]]''
 
*** [[Burmish languages|Burmese–Maru]]
IV. ''[[Jingpho language|Kachin]]''
:(perhaps*** includingSouthern [[SakLoloish languages|LuishLolo]])
*** Northern [[Loloish languages|Lolo]]
 
*** [[Ugong language|Kanburi Lawa]]
V. ''[[Lolo–Burmese languages|Burmese–Lolo]]''
*** [[Naxi language|Moso]]
: A. [[Burmish languages|Burmese–Maru]]
*** Hsi-fan ([[Qiangic languages|Qiangic]] and [[Jiarongic languages]] apart from Qiang and Gyarung themselves)
: B. Southern [[Loloish languages|Lolo]]
*** [[Tangut language|Tangut]]
: C. Northern [[Loloish languages|Lolo]]
*** (perhaps also [[Nungish languages|Nung]])
: D. [[Ugong language|Kanburi Lawa]]
** ''[[Boro-Garo languages|Boro-Garo]]''
: E. [[Naxi language|Moso]]
*** Boro
: F. Hsi-fan ([[Qiangic languages|Qiangic]] and [[Jiarongic languages]] apart from Qiang and Gyarung themselves)
*** Garo ([[A·chik]])
: G. [[Tangut language|Tangut]]
*** [[Kokborok language|Tripuri (Kokborok)]]
:(perhaps also [[Nungish languages|Nung]])
*** Dimasa
 
*** Mech
VI. ''[[Boro-Garo languages|Boro-Garo]]''
*** Rava ([[Koch language|Koch]])
: A. Boro
*** [[Tiwa people (India)|Tiwa]] (Lalung)
: B. Garo ([[A·chik]])
*** Sutiya
: C. [[Kokborok language|Tripuri (Kokborok)]]
*** Saraniya
: D. Dimasa
*** Sonowal
: E. Mech
*** Thengal
: F. Rava ([[Koch language|Koch]])
*** (Perhaps also "[[Konyak languages|Naked Naga]]" a.k.a. Konyak)
: G. [[Tiwa people (India)|Tiwa]] (Lalung)
** ''[[Kukish languages|Kuki–Naga]]'' (a.k.a. Kukish)
: H. Sutiya
*** (perhaps also [[Karbi language|Karbi]], [[Meithei language|Meithei]], [[Mru language|Mru]])
: I. Saraniya
{{tree list/end}}
: J. Sonowal
:(Perhaps also "[[Konyak languages|Naked Naga]]" a.k.a. Konyak)
 
VII. ''[[Kukish languages|Kuki–Naga]]'' (a.k.a. Kukish)
:(perhaps also [[Karbi language|Karbi]], [[Meithei language|Meithei]], [[Mru language|Mru]])
 
===Matisoff (1978)===
[[James Matisoff]] proposes a modification of Benedict that demoted Karen but kept the divergent position of Sinitic.{{sfnp|Namkung|1996|p=455}} Of the 7 branches within Tibeto-Burman, 2 branches (Baic and Karenic) have [[Subject–verb–object|SVO]]-order languages, whereas all the other 5 branches have [[Subject–object–verb|SOV]]-order languages.
 
{{tree list}}
:Sino-Tibetan
* Sino-Tibetan
:# Chinese
** Chinese
:# '''Tibeto-Burman'''
** '''Tibeto-Burman'''
{{tree list/end}}
 
Tibeto-Burman is then divided into several branches, some of them geographic conveniences rather than linguistic proposals:
 
{{tree list}}
*Kamarupan (geographic)
*'''Tibeto-Burman'''
**[[Kuki-Chin–Naga languages|Kuki-Chin–Naga]] (geographic)
**Kamarupan (geographic)
**[[Tani languages|Abor–Miri–Dafla]]
***[[Boro–GaroKuki-Chin–Naga languages|Boro–GaroKuki-Chin–Naga]] (geographic)
***[[HimalayishTani languages|HimalayishAbor–Miri–Dafla]] (geographic)
***[[Boro–Garo languages|Boro–Garo]]
**[[Mahakiranti languages|Mahakiranti]] (includes [[Newar language|Newar]], [[Magar language|Magar]], [[Kiranti languages|Kiranti]])
**[[Tibeto-KanauriHimalayish languages|Tibeto-KanauriHimalayish]] (includes [[Lepcha language|Lepcha]]geographic)
***[[Mahakiranti languages|Mahakiranti]] (includes [[Newar language|Newar]], [[Magar language|Magar]], [[Kiranti languages|Kiranti]])
*[[Qiangic languages|Qiangic]]
***[[Tibeto-Kanauri languages|Tibeto-Kanauri]] (includes [[Lepcha language|Lepcha]])
*Jingpho–Nungish–Luish
**[[JingphoQiangic languagelanguages|JingphoQiangic]]
**Jingpho–Nungish–Luish
**[[Nungish languages|Nungish]]
***[[SakJingpho languageslanguage|LuishJingpho]]
***[[Lolo–BurmeseNungish languages|Lolo–Burmese]]–[[Nakhi|NaxiNungish]]
***[[KarenSak languages|KarenicLuish]]
**[[Lolo–Burmese languages|Lolo–Burmese]]–[[Nakhi|Naxi]]
*[[Bai language|Bai]]c
**[[Karen languages|Karenic]]
*[[Tujia language|Tujia]] (unclassified)
**[[Bai language|Bai]]c
**[[Tujia language|Tujia]] (unclassified)
{{tree list/end}}
 
Matisoff makes no claim that the families in the Kamarupan or Himalayish branches have a special relationship to one another other than a geographic one. They are intended rather as categories of convenience pending more detailed comparative work.
Line 233 ⟶ 239:
Since Benedict (1972), many languages previously inadequately documented have received more attention with the publication of new grammars, dictionaries, and wordlists. This new research has greatly benefited comparative work, and [[David Bradley (linguist)|Bradley]] (2002) incorporates much of the newer data.{{sfnp|Bradley|2002}}
 
{{tree list}}
I. Western (= [[Bodic languages|Bodic]])
* '''Tibeto-Burman'''
: A. [[Tibeto-Kanauri languages|Tibetan–Kanauri]]
::** i.Western (= [[TibeticBodic languages|TibeticBodic]])
:: ii.*** [[TamangicTibeto-Kanauri languages|GurungTibetan–Kanauri]]
**** [[Tibetic languages|Tibetic]]
:: iii. [[East Bodish languages|East Bodic]] (incl. [[Tshangla language|Tsangla]])
:: iv.**** [[West HimalayishTamangic languages|KanauriGurung]]
**** [[East Bodish languages|East Bodic]] (incl. [[Tshangla language|Tsangla]])
: B. [[Mahakiranti languages|Himalayan]]
::**** i. Eastern ([[KirantiWest Himalayish languages|KirantiKanauri]])
*** [[Mahakiranti languages|Himalayan]]
:: ii. Western ([[Newar language|Newar]], [[Chepangic languages|Chepang]], [[Magaric languages|Magar]], [[Thangmi language|Thangmi]], [[Baram language|Baram]])
**** Eastern ([[Kiranti languages|Kiranti]])
 
**** Western ([[Newar language|Newar]], [[Chepangic languages|Chepang]], [[Magaric languages|Magar]], [[Thangmi language|Thangmi]], [[Baram language|Baram]])
II. ''[[Sal languages|Sal]]''
:** A.''[[Sal languages|Sal]]''
*** [[Baric languages|Baric]] ([[Boro–Garo languages|Boro–Garo]]–[[Konyak languages|Northern Naga]])
: B.*** [[Jingpho language|Jinghpaw]]
: C.*** [[Sak languages|Luish]] (incl. [[Pyu language (Burma)|Pyu]])
: D.*** [[Kuki-Chin languages|Kuki-Chin]] (incl. [[Meitei language|Meithei]] and [[Karbi language|Karbi]])
** ''Central'' (perhaps a residual group, not actually related to each other. [[Lepcha language|Lepcha]] may also fit here.)
 
*** [[Miric languages|Adi–Galo–Mishing–Nishi]]
III. ''Central'' (perhaps a residual group, not actually related to each other. [[Lepcha language|Lepcha]] may also fit here.)
*** [[Mishmic languages|Mishmi]] ([[Digaro languages|Digarish]] and [[Midzu languages|Keman]])
: A. [[Miric languages|Adi–Galo–Mishing–Nishi]]
*** [[Nungish languages|Rawang]]
: B. [[Mishmic languages|Mishmi]] ([[Digaro languages|Digarish]] and [[Midzu languages|Keman]])
** ''North-Eastern''
: C. [[Nungish languages|Rawang]]
*** [[Qiangic languages|Qiangic]]
 
*** [[Naxi language|Naxi]]–[[Bai language|Bai]]
IV. ''North-Eastern''
: A.*** [[QiangicTujia languageslanguage|QiangicTujia]]
:*** B. [[Naxi language|Naxi]]–[[BaiTangut language|BaiTangut]]
** ''South-Eastern''
: C. [[Tujia language|Tujia]]
:*** D[[Lolo–Burmese languages|Burmese–Lolo]] (incl. [[TangutMru language|TangutMru]])
*** [[Karen languages|Karen]]
 
{{tree list/end}}
V. ''South-Eastern''
: A. [[Lolo–Burmese languages|Burmese–Lolo]] (incl. [[Mru language|Mru]])
: B. [[Karen languages|Karen]]
 
===van Driem===
Line 271 ⟶ 276:
 
{{tree list}}
*'''Tibeto-Burman'''
**Northeast Indian areal group
***"North Assam"
Line 313 ⟶ 318:
 
===Other languages===
The classification of [[Tujia language|Tujia]] is difficult due to extensive borrowing. Other unclassified Tibeto-Burman languages include [[Basum language|Basum]] and the recently described [[Songlin language|Songlin]] and [[Chamdo languages]], both of which were only described in the 2010s. New Tibeto-Burman languages continue to be recognized, some not closely related to other languages. RecentlyDistinct languages only recognized distinctin languagesthe 2010s include [[Koki Naga language|Koki Naga]].
 
[[Randy LaPolla]] (2003) proposed a [[Rung languages|Rung branch]] of Tibeto-Burman, based on morphological evidence, but this is not widely accepted.
 
[[Scott DeLancey]] (2015)<ref>DeLancey, Scott. 2015. "Morphological Evidence for a Central Branch of Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan)." ''Cahiers de linguistique - Asie oriental'' 44(2):122-149122–149. December 2015. {{doi|10.1163/19606028-00442p02}}</ref> proposed a [[Central Tibeto-Burman languages|Central branch]] of Tibeto-Burman based on morphological evidence.
 
Roger Blench and Mark Post (2011) list a number of divergent languages of [[Arunachal Pradesh]], in northeastern India, that might have non-Tibeto-Burman substrates, or could even be non-Tibeto-Burman [[language isolate]]s:{{sfnp|Blench|Post|2011}}
 
{{tree list}}
*[[Kamengic languages|Kamengic]]
**[[Kamengic languages|Kamengic]]
**[[Bugun language|Bugun]] (Khowa)
***[[MeyBugun language|MeyBugun]] (SherdukpenKhowa) of Shergaon
***[[Mey language|Mey]] (Sherdukpen) of RupaShergaon
***[[SartangMey language|SartangMey]] (Sherdukpen) of Rupa
***[[Sartang language|Sartang]]
***[[Chug language|Chug]] and [[Lish language|Lish]]
**[[Northern Mishmi languages|[Northern] Mishmi]] (Digarish)
***[[Idu Mishmi language|Idu]] (Luoba)
***[[Digaro Mishmi language|Taraon]] (Digaru)
**[[Siangic languages|Siangic]]
***[[Koro language (India)|Koro]]
***[[Milang language|Milang]]
**[[Puroik language|Puroik]] (Sulung) - [[East Kameng District]]
**[[Hruso language|Hruso]] (Aka) - Thrizino Circle, [[West Kameng District]]
**[[Miji language|Miji]] (Sajolang, Dimai, Dhimmai)
**[[Miju Mishmi language|Miju]]
{{tree list/end}}
 
Blench and Post believe the remaining languages with these substratal characteristics are more clearly Sino-Tibetan:
 
*East Bodish
{{tree list}}
**[[Zakhring language|Meyor]] (Zakhring)
**East Bodish
**[[Tawang Monpa language|Monpa of Tawang]] - [[Tawang District]]
***[[Kalaktang MonpaZakhring language|Monpa of KalaktangMeyor]] (TshanglaZakhring)
***[[ZemithangTawang Monpa language|Monpa of ZemithangTawang]] – [[Tawang District]]
***[[Kalaktang Monpa language|Monpa of Kalaktang]] (Tshangla)
**Monpa of Mago-Thingbu
*Tani: **[[NahZemithang Monpa language|NahMonpa of Zemithang]]
***Monpa of Mago-Thingbu
**Tani: [[Nah language|Nah]]
{{tree list/end}}
 
== Notes ==
Line 475 ⟶ 486:
| volume = X | issue = 2 | year = 1878 | pages = 210–227 | jstor = 25196796
| postscript = . | doi=10.1017/s0035869x00016956
| s2cid = 163329316 | url = https://zenodo.org/record/1428638 }}
* {{citation
| first = Zev | last = Handel
Line 536 ⟶ 547:
| doi = 10.1080/00437956.1955.11659552
| postscript = .
| doi-access = free
}}
* {{citation
Line 598 ⟶ 610:
==Further reading==
{{sister project |project=wiktionary |text=[[Wiktionary]] has '''''[[Wiktionary:Appendix:Vocabulary lists of Mainland Southeast Asian languages|Vocabulary lists of Mainland Southeast Asian languages]]'''''}}
* Mann, Noel Walter. (1998). ''[https://www.sil.org/resources/archives/10062 A phonological reconstruction of Proto Northern Burmic]''. Unpublished thesis. Arlington: The University of Texas.
* {{cite EB1911 |wstitle=Tibeto-Burman Languages |volume=26 |pages=928–929 |first=Sten |last=Konow}}
 
Line 613 ⟶ 625:
[[Category:Tibeto-Burman languages| ]]
[[Category:Languages of Tibet]]
[[Category:Languages of Myanmar]]