[go: nahoru, domu]

Content deleted Content added
Interesting theory
fix
Line 23:
{{Quote
|text=I do not suggest that Washington planned to shield Kagame from international prosecution, or that the US was the only Security Council member to embrace him... However, once Washington [...] entered into a partnership with the ‘new’ Rwanda, it was committed to moving forward – and this implied burying the past and oftentimes also ignoring the present. At every critical moment since then, Washington exhibited ‘path dependence’: the set of decisions it faced regarding Rwanda was limited by the decisions it had made (or not made) in the past, even though past circumstances were no longer relevant.
|author=Luc Reydams, 2013. This rings very true. Cuba comes to mind. |source=[https://www.uantwerpen.be/images/uantwerpen/container2143/files/Publications/DP/2013/01-Reydams.pdf]
}}