[go: nahoru, domu]

009o9

Joined 2 March 2012

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ScottMHoward (talk | contribs) at 04:27, 22 July 2013 (→‎WP:COI? Really?: addition for civility's sake.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 11 years ago by ScottMHoward in topic WP:COI? Really?

Jan Goldsmith

You added some details about the the Olson graffiti case to the goldsmith article that I think is not really appropriate to the article, namely Judge Shore's comments and admonitions. They have little to nothing to do with the subject of the article and I think more properly belong in the article on the Olson graffiti case rather than here. Could you explain why you think they belong in the Goldsmith article?Litch (talk) 08:39, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I cannot locate the Olsen Graffiti Case you've referenced???. The graffiti case was already mentioned in the Goldsmith article in an unremarkable paragraph about a feud with the Mayor. (I note that a recall effort against the Mayor is in the current news cycle.) The entire paragraph did not even include the name of the defendant, Jeff Olsen, who risked his Liberty testing the limits of his First Amendment and political-speech rights. This was a political-speech case of national interest, as was the number of charges leveled, and the prosecutor's decision to proceed. I simply added the "Who, What, When, Where, Why and How" from published sources. Since the references do not state that Jan Goldsmith petitioned the Court for the First Amendment admonishment, nor the Gag order, I documented the person who ultimately endorsed these highly atypical orders (Judge Shore) to ensure that the reader would not inadvertently attribute these motions to Goldsmith.
Finally, why are we discussing this here, rather than the Jan Goldsmith talk page?009o9 (talk) 14:24, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse invitation

Teahouse logo 
Hello! 009o9, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 05:28, 11 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Message sent with Global message delivery.

A barnstar for you!

  The Original Barnstar
Hi Steve! I wanted to drop off this barnstar as recognition for your hardwork at improving the Sara Niemietz article. Keep up the great work, and feel free to ask any questions or participate at the Teahouse if you so desire. Great work again, and THANK YOU for contributing to Wikipedia. Sarah (talk) 03:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
p.s. what article(s) do you think you'll work on next? Sarah (talk) 03:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Sara Niemietz Offical Photo w Guitar.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Sara Niemietz Offical Photo w Guitar.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 14:20, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

S. Niemietz

Further to our discussion on File talk:Sara Niemietz Offical Photo w Guitar.jpg: do you work for Miss Niemietz? In that case, if your employer is known for such a "professional work ethic" as you say, she might also want to watch out for a more professional approach to editing an encyclopedia article about her. With your recent edits, you have turned that page into a very ugly piece of public-relations-speak, highly promotional in tone and not at all suitable for a serious, neutral piece of coverage in an encyclopedia. Please make yourself more familiar with the expectations of this project before continuing to work on it. For the moment, I've reverted it to an older stage (even though I'm aware that too was far from perfect). Fut.Perf. 16:19, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

No, I do not work for Ms. Niemietz, I do enjoy her work and began documenting what survives of her references about a month ago. I realize that the Quotation template may be a bit overused and I was planning on reviewing them and the WWWWWH as I re-evaluated how the piece would flow with the references that have been found to still be available.
In some cases the pictures tell just as much of the story as the reference-able material that remains.
How would you suggest that we proceed?

009o9 (talk) 17:12, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Just on a side note, if you don't work for her, I'm a bit left wondering why you seemed to be speaking as if on her behalf when you described what she "prefers, for professional reasons", in her article here ([1]). Fut.Perf. 20:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
That industry (Music recording) is very sensitive about retaining and not infringing copyright -- I am in touch with the Artist working with her on this -- My interest is to learn the Wikipedia, but without an interesting subject -- I wouldn't do the reading and have the hands - on. More on your Talk page -- I'll be unavailable till this evening. 009o9 (talk) 21:00, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:13 Musical Mark Taper Forum.jpg

⚠ 

Thanks for uploading File:13 Musical Mark Taper Forum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:28, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:009o9/Sara Niemietz discography has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Niemietz discography, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 00:18, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Non-free images

Hello there. Due to Wikipedia's policies on non-free files I had to remove several copyrighted images from User:009o9/Sara Niemietz Biography Draft. Sorry about that. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:49, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Help Survey

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 17:31, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Studio City Sound

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Studio City Sound requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NtheP (talk) 20:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Note: This issue turned out to be a Wikipedia bot that had identified identical content on the Internet -- it turned out that the identical content was a mirror of the Wikipedia article. 009o9 (talk) 16:44, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Movie poster art for Stetson Street Dog of Park City.jpg)

  Thanks for uploading File:Movie poster art for Stetson Street Dog of Park City.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:07, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, this and a few other versions were uploaded at a time when the Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard was malfunctioning and would not display the completion splash screen. I assumed these upload attempts had failed and tried to upload again. I've posted an Okay to delete comment on the file's talk page and assume it is okay to allow the bot to do its job. 009o9 (talk) 06:27, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Donald Takayama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nat Young (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Request Edit

Hi 009o9. Thanks for taking a look at my Request Edit at Talk:YouSendIt#Reception. I made the tweaks you suggested regarding italics and such and was hoping you could take another look. The Request Edit's about 3 weeks old and I'm eager to nominate the article for GA afterwards.

As a side-note, by chance I noticed you used the {{request edit|A}} accept template Noununiquenames and I created a while back over at Talk:Ginger_Software#requestedit. It's actually intended for you to add the "A" to the original Request Edit, rather than adding it. Otherwise it never leaves the Request Edit queue. (not sure if that makes sense, but best way I could think of to explain it). CorporateM (Talk) 15:29, 23 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Living Room Sessions (B. J. Thomas album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CMT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:009o9/Jerusalem Countdown (film) has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jerusalem Countdown (film), this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 21:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Rock & Roll Heart Attack

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rock & Roll Heart Attack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:59, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Rock & Roll Heart Attack

I have "userfied" it to User:009o9/Rock & Roll Heart Attack. It would be best to get an article for the artist accepted before re-posting it. You will probably find that a bot removes the cover image, because non-free images are not allowed in user space, but it can easily be restored when the article goes live. JohnCD (talk) 17:31, 11 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks JohnCD, I appreciate it. I've commented the image on the version you've "userfied" for me. I'll get the artist's bio finished and post all five articles when I can set aside a large block of time. 009o9 (talk) 18:10, 11 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cindy Valentine Rock and Roll Heart Attack.jpg)

  Thanks for uploading File:Cindy Valentine Rock and Roll Heart Attack.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:32, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:009o9/10 West Studios has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/10 West Studios, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

 
Jerusalem Countdown (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Deadbeef (talk) 08:24, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jerusalem Countdown (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Gilbert (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you want to know, the two sections snipped were done so because they were irrelevant to the article. One section was on the town the studio is in and the other is about the Michigan Tax credit. Nothing wrong with noting what town a studio is (even encouraged), but you don't need a section about what's in that town. But yeah, lots of people edit lots of articles. LionMans Account (talk) 03:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

The location of a movie studio is more than just the building, it can also be about the availability of outdoor shots. For instance a lake and lake-shore that can pass as a California beach, sand dunes, Victorian homes that can be rented as sets etc. Secondly, without the Michigan Film Incentive, the likelihood that a 100,000 ft. film studio would have been funded in Northwestern Michigan is very low, Harold Cronk brought the film industry and employment to his neighborhood. So both sections are very relevant to the 10 West Studio and Harold Cronk success story.
What I don't understand is why you would blank two sections and then leave the article in AfC for someone else to deal with -- it certainly gives the appearance of dirty pool. Why didn't you just decline the article? 009o9 (talk) 04:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Welcome!

  WP:Globalization
Welcome to WikiProject Globalization! We look forward to your contributions towards improving Wikipedia's coverage of globalization. Please feel free to ask questions or make suggestions on the project's talk page.

Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 16:35, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the kind welcome 009o9 (talk) 17:55, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

WP:COI? Really?

Please do not accuse me of having a Conflict of Interest for removing content that stands only to provide visitors to an encyclopedic article a route to a third party download website. Not only does this have nothing to do with a conflict of interest (how on earth do you believe I am directly associated with Lindsey Stirling in any way?), but now this is becoming something much more escalated than it needs to be.

We are having a discussion on the talk page of Lindsey Stirling, and that is all. If you want to start accusing people of irrational things just because you're having a disagreement, when all I'm trying to do is keep an article within Wikipedia's standards, then perhaps it's time for an administrator's mediation before the article becomes an edit war mess.

Please stop adding information to an article while a discussion about such information is in progress on the talk page before a consensus is reached. You were bold in your additions, were reverted, so it's currently in the discuss stage. Let's try to remain civil.~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 04:17, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Reply