750h+
This is 750h+'s talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1 |
Replies from GA review
Here are my responses from Talk:Zbrojovka Z 4/GA1
- 1: done
- 2: changed "2750" in lead/lede to "2,750"
- 3: I assume you want me to do this "In the early 1930s, Zbrojovka Brno produced the Z 9
type, a car which sales results did not meet expectations."
CosXZ (talk) 21:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, so those were only minor concerns. But I'll give you some other things I have a problem with:
- the lead is a bit short, maybe make it as big as this article's lead section or shorter.
- second year of the Czechoslovak 1,000 mile ==> second year of the Czechoslovak 1,000 mile
- debuted in April 1933 at the Prague motor show . ==> debuted in April 1933 at the Prague Motor Show.
- I will have more comments. 750h+ 13:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to the club
The Featured Article Medal | ||
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 11:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC) |
- Thanks Gog! feels great! 750h+ 13:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Promotion of Aston Martin DB9
- fn bjf ekjglrqjhwgtbr hjdf gu GOG I CAN Triutbe4ot4oig5wrkjgnbt YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS 750h+ 13:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- !!!!!!!!!! congrats on the FA! keep it up!
> Tesseractic: talk? ✎
18:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)- Thanks :)!! 750h+ 00:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- !!!!!!!!!! congrats on the FA! keep it up!
A barnstar for you!
The Special Barnstar | |
GA noms usually take a long time. Honestly, I think I have only seen once an article that skipped GAN and went directly to FA status. You’ve got some courage to do that lol, especially without peer review. 48JCL (talk) 20:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC) |
- Thank you so much 48JCL! This is my second FAC too! 750h+ 23:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- By the way, do you plan in the near future to bring Botswana to FA, @48JCL:? The article in question has been promoted by the way. 750h+ 11:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- @750h+:, yes definitely. 48JCL TALK 12:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
"more extensive comments might come soon"
Hi 750h+. Not to bother you, but it has been more than a week since your last comments from this FAC. Is there more coming? — VAUGHAN J. (t · c) 07:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- oops, i forgot about this. will continue either today or tommorow 750h+ 07:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- actually i've left some comments there 750h+ 07:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
FAC
@750h+ I have assessed your FA nomination for the Lagonda Taraf and am hopeful it will soon be promoted to FA-class. I trust that Catherine's article will make for an excellent read and look forward to addressing your comments on its FAC. Your timely review would be greatly appreciated. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 07:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! I should take a look at it in a few hours 750h+ 07:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @750h+ Thanks for your comments at Catherine's FAC yesterday. While I am still awaiting comments from other experienced editors I have reached out to, do you have any further suggestions for the article? If yes, please do let me know. Regards and yours faithfully, MSincccc (talk) 13:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
In appreciation
The Reviewers Award | ||
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this award in recognition of the thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried out at FAC. This work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC) |
- o thanks Gog! very much appreciated!
- 750h+ 22:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Promotion of Aston Martin Rapide
- yess finally after over a month! 750h+ 00:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
I think it's much better I post here. It seems like you already have the GAN Review Tool script saved. It works on mobile device browsers. I didn't realize it was the reason why. Hopefully this helps for future reviews as well. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- i do have it saved, but it’s not working on safari. I’ll try Google. 750h+ 01:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Gotcha. No worries then. No rush. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Okay I've promoted it. Sorry about that 750h+ 01:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- No worries at all. No apologies needed. I didn't mean to rush. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Okay I've promoted it. Sorry about that 750h+ 01:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Gotcha. No worries then. No rush. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Narwhal
Hi, could you take a look at this article at FAC and provide some comments? Thanks, Wolverine XI (talk to me) 15:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sure I can take a look at it in a bit. 750h+ 15:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 18:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 17:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- O honoured to be granted this.
- 750h+ 17:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
June 2024
Your recent editing history at TDI (engine) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I'm not sure who's "right" here, but this level of back-and-forth doesn't care, and you'll both end up blocked if you're not careful. The edits in question don't seem to be outright vandalism, so please discuss on the talk page, thanks. Chaheel Riens (talk) 08:13, 20 June 2024 (UTC)