[go: nahoru, domu]

750h+

Joined 1 November 2023

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chaheel Riens (talk | contribs) at 08:13, 20 June 2024 (Warning: Three-revert rule on TDI (engine).). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 2 months ago by Chaheel Riens in topic June 2024

Replies from GA review

Here are my responses from Talk:Zbrojovka Z 4/GA1

  • 1: done
  • 2: changed "2750" in lead/lede to "2,750"
  • 3: I assume you want me to do this "In the early 1930s, Zbrojovka Brno produced the Z 9 type, a car which sales results did not meet expectations."

CosXZ (talk) 21:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay, so those were only minor concerns. But I'll give you some other things I have a problem with:
  • the lead is a bit short, maybe make it as big as this article's lead section or shorter.
  • second year of the Czechoslovak 1,000 mile ==> second year of the Czechoslovak 1,000 mile
  • debuted in April 1933 at the Prague motor show . ==> debuted in April 1933 at the Prague Motor Show.
I will have more comments. 750h+ 13:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the club

  The Featured Article Medal
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 11:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Gog! feels great! 750h+ 13:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Promotion of Aston Martin DB9

Congratulations, 750h+! The article you nominated, Aston Martin DB9, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
fn bjf ekjglrqjhwgtbr hjdf gu GOG I CAN Triutbe4ot4oig5wrkjgnbt YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS 750h+ 13:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
!!!!!!!!!! congrats on the FA! keep it up! > Tesseractic: talk? 18:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks :)!! 750h+ 00:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

  The Special Barnstar
GA noms usually take a long time. Honestly, I think I have only seen once an article that skipped GAN and went directly to FA status. You’ve got some courage to do that lol, especially without peer review. 48JCL (talk) 20:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much 48JCL! This is my second FAC too! 750h+ 23:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
By the way, do you plan in the near future to bring Botswana to FA, @48JCL:? The article in question has been promoted by the way. 750h+ 11:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@750h+:, yes definitely. 48JCL TALK 12:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

"more extensive comments might come soon"

Hi 750h+. Not to bother you, but it has been more than a week since your last comments from this FAC. Is there more coming? — VAUGHAN J. (t · c) 07:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

oops, i forgot about this. will continue either today or tommorow 750h+ 07:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
actually i've left some comments there 750h+ 07:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

FAC

@750h+ I have assessed your FA nomination for the Lagonda Taraf and am hopeful it will soon be promoted to FA-class. I trust that Catherine's article will make for an excellent read and look forward to addressing your comments on its FAC. Your timely review would be greatly appreciated. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 07:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review! I should take a look at it in a few hours 750h+ 07:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@750h+ Thanks for your comments at Catherine's FAC yesterday. While I am still awaiting comments from other experienced editors I have reached out to, do you have any further suggestions for the article? If yes, please do let me know. Regards and yours faithfully, MSincccc (talk) 13:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
No. 750h+ 13:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

In appreciation

The Reviewers Award  The Reviewers Award
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this award in recognition of the thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried out at FAC. This work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
o thanks Gog! very much appreciated!
750h+ 22:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Promotion of Aston Martin Rapide

Congratulations, 750h+! The article you nominated, Aston Martin Rapide, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
yess finally after over a month! 750h+ 00:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

User:Novem Linguae/Scripts/GANReviewTool

I think it's much better I post here. It seems like you already have the GAN Review Tool script saved. It works on mobile device browsers. I didn't realize it was the reason why. Hopefully this helps for future reviews as well. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

i do have it saved, but it’s not working on safari. I’ll try Google. 750h+ 01:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Gotcha. No worries then. No rush. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Okay I've promoted it. Sorry about that 750h+ 01:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
No worries at all. No apologies needed. I didn't mean to rush. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Narwhal

Hi, could you take a look at this article at FAC and provide some comments? Thanks, Wolverine XI (talk to me) 15:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sure I can take a look at it in a bit. 750h+ 15:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 18:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Pending changes reviewer granted

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 17:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

O honoured to be granted this.
750h+ 17:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

Stop icon 

Your recent editing history at TDI (engine) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I'm not sure who's "right" here, but this level of back-and-forth doesn't care, and you'll both end up blocked if you're not careful. The edits in question don't seem to be outright vandalism, so please discuss on the talk page, thanks. Chaheel Riens (talk) 08:13, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply