Content deleted Content added
Becritical (talk | contribs) |
Qaleechpuri (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 111:
:I do hope Qaleechpuri can give us some reliable sources here. The recent post by Sheokhandaa serves to give me the suspicion that Qaleechpuri has a point. '''BE'''—<span style="background:black;color:white;padding:3px 8px 5px 0px;text-shadow:white 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;font-size:100%;">—'''Critical'''</span><sub>__[[User_talk:Becritical|Talk]]</sub> 08:48, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
: Hi Becritical and thx for your efforts. i must make it clear that these are two different communites and are recognised as such by its respective members. for example the Jatt community of east/west Punjab share a common wesbite to discuss their culture and traditions by the name of www.Jattworld.com while those who are known as Jaat share their culture and beliefs on a website called www.Jatland.com spelling and different pronounciation is clear to those on those websites that a Jatt from punjab is never called a Jaat or Jat with a soft T. apart from when i started the article [[Jatt]] i quoted from the well known ethnology books compiled by great british scholars called the glossary of tribes and castes of Punjab and the NW Province by HA rose. Denzil ibbetson and Alexander cunningham. In those references which sheokhanda has included in his own tribes history it is very clear that the ethnographers are refering to the Jatt tribe of Punjab and not anywhere else. i refer to the following texts in article [Jatt]
* 1.1 Are the Jats and Rajputs distinct?
* 1.2 Jats and Sikhism
* 1.3 Jats as Zamindar Landlords
* 1.4 Jat Characteristics.
* 1.5 The Position of the Jat in the Punjab
* 1.6 The Jat Elements
* 1.7 Social distinctions among the Jats
above references in no way address the tribe called Jaat of [[haryana]] or [[rajastan]]but the Jatts of Punjab who clearly have a different history and status from the Jaats or Jats. Yet sheokhnada included these references in his article which is misleading. Also the language barrier is different between these two peoples the Jatts speak [Punjabi] they have their own ancient folklore in punjabi like the romances of [[heer ranjha]] [[Mirza Sahiba]] [[Sassi Punnun]] [[Sohni Mahiwal]] which are sung by Jatt people these folklore and songs of romance are NOT shared by the Jaats/Jat tribe nor are they in their language. the language of the Jaats is [[Haryanvi language]] and historically this has nothing to do with the [[Jatt]] population of [[punjab]] nor is it spoken in anywhere in Punjab the home of Jatts.
In the article [[Jat]] sheokhanda has translated the word Jat in urdu/arabic script and is clearly written Jaat not Jatt. i myself am ableto read the script anyone can confirm that it is written as Jaat and not Jatt a clear admittance on hispart that his tribe is named Jaat/Jat and not Jatt with a hard T. even the page [[Jaat]] has been redirected to article [Jat]proving that is the correct name of their tribe and is exactly how it is pronounced where Jaats are found.
Also the article Jat is giving misleading information for ex the section # 5.2 Balhara rule in Sindh states that Balhara was a Jat king yet ifone reads the actual book from where this references is taken there is no mention whatsoever of the tribe of this King or if he was a Jat! again we find the same in # 5.6 Rai Dynasty where the writer claims these kings belonged to the Jat tribe yet there is no historical proof for this.
so my aim is to portray what is correct and accurately written by historians on the Jatt tribe of punjab irrespective of religion and not on the Jaat/Jat people of haryana/rajastan india! --[[User:Qaleechpuri|Qaleechpuri]] ([[User talk:Qaleechpuri|talk]]) 12:00, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
| |||