Content deleted Content added
BilledMammal (talk | contribs) Undid revision 1234372601 by BilledMammal (talk) Edit conflicted, sorry User:Kashmiri, seems the ping was not necessary |
BilledMammal (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 17:
:FYI, when you self-revert I'll partially self-revert to remove the aspects I agree are problematic. Sorry for not doing so initially - I overlooked some of the aspects of your edit. Hopefully that will make you more willing to self-revert? [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 00:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
::Urm yeah it is better to talk through on talk page, I'd keep the "Hamas-run" and "Like in all wars" part out for now if it's up to me as seems a big step to keep in, if those are the problematic parts you are referring to. Otherwise yeah can self-revert and ask talk page. [[User:Ecpiandy|Ecpiandy]] ([[User talk:Ecpiandy#top|talk]]) 01:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:::Actually, I was referring to "Some sources have hypothesised that there may be" and "though it is not known who was responsible", but I'm happy to remove "Like in all wars" (true, and context is important, but that's a bad way to provide the context).
:::Hamas-run I'd prefer to keep, given previous consensus and the frequency of mention in reliable sources, but if it will help resolve this I'll self-revert that as well.
:::However, technically you do need to self-revert everything, and then I can self-revert those aspects to get them out again. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 01:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:In terms of the "childish strikes" thing, I was unable of this extended-confirmed rule so I have rollbacked that, thanks for letting me know. [[User:Ecpiandy|Ecpiandy]] ([[User talk:Ecpiandy#top|talk]]) 00:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
::No problem, I see you're new to the topic page. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 01:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
| |||