Content deleted Content added
→Congratulations...: new section |
new section |
||
Line 117:
...on becoming a CheckUser. I hope you find the work rewarding. Best, [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 03:01, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
==Off topic and uncivil==
Please note the article is under these restrictions.
*Civility restriction: Users are required to follow proper decorum during discussions and edits. Users may be sanctioned (including blocks) if they make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith.
The comments are completely off topic and are of a uncivil nature, they are also completely false.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=863248241]
At 30:21 he states they don't use assalt weapons all the time only a quarter of the time and if they did not have those there are other weapons as equally deadly.
It has been stated on the AR Talk page that none of this is relevant to the article. "Where does he say "ar-125" or "assault rifle " (a-or any thing approximate to those). This page is about AR-15 style rifles, not mass shootings. So if a source does not explicitly talk about (at the very least) semi-auto rifles it is irrelevant to this article.Slatersteven (talk), 7 October 2018"
I would like to hear what uninvolved editors views are on any inclusion for the section in the AR-15 article for the "Use in crime and mass shootings". -72bikers (talk) 9 October 2018, Tuesday (8 days ago) (UTC−4)
It appears he is referring to Slatersteven's comments on denying mass shooting content. and there is much more of this behavior.
This is just a sample of this editors history of making personal attacks against me[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Simonm223&diff=856238164&oldid=856232344],[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:AR-15_style_rifle&diff=856316884&oldid=856314605](calling me illiterate) and has been warned about it.
*Simonm223, this is really not cool. I know you're talking about content, but I also know that you're really not. Please refrain. Y'all please try to get along--and all of y'all, please be more careful in copyediting, both in article posts and in talk page comments. (I mean just about everyone on those talk pages.) Drmies (talk) 11:15 am, 18 September 2018, Tuesday (29 days ago) (UTC−4)
I fail to see why off topic uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, that I have shown you are incorrect should not be collapsed. please advise. -[[User:72bikers|72bikers]] ([[User talk:72bikers|talk]]) 16:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
| |||