Content deleted Content added
Rogermccart (talk | contribs) →Commons: Reply |
Notifying about declined speedy deletion (CSDH) |
||
Line 251:
:Hi Rogermccart, the basic 'commons' template will take you to the gallery page in the category, if there is one, but if there is no gallery page it will link to the category; the 'commonscat' template will always point to the category. I prefer to use the latter because when I'm following one of those links I want to see all the images in the category, not just the few that someone has chosen to put in the gallery, and I assume other people would want the same. Cheers, Steve <span style="padding:2px;font-family:Arial;background:yellow;border:solid 1px #aa0000;border-radius:3px;"> [[User:Junglenut|Junglenut]] |[[User talk:Junglenut |Talk]]</span> 04:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
::OK Thanks for the clarification. I'll follow your advice, Roger [[User:Rogermccart|Rogermccart]] ([[User talk:Rogermccart|talk]]) 04:49, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
== Speedy deletion declined: [[:Buchanania lanzan]] ==
Hello Junglenut. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of [[:Buchanania lanzan]], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: {{reply to|Junglenut|Abductive|Plantdrew}} *Long version* OK: so it was initially described as B. lanzan by [[Spreng.]] sometime in [[19th century|C19]], then in different genera / in the same genus but with different specific epithets / and so on until 1996, and according to https://www.ipni.org/n/20008347-1 ... oh, but wait, I missed something. As of 2024 - https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:773749-1 - , appears to be accepted as a synonym of [[Glycosmis cochinchinensis]] which [[WP:REDIRECT]]s to [[:Buchanania cochinchinensis]] and now I'm very much confused. *Short version*: to [[Talk:Buchanania cochinchinensis]], please.[[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 🦘 09:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC). Thank you. [[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 🦘 09:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
|