[go: nahoru, domu]

Content deleted Content added
The People's Operator: Garrard's editorial help
Line 742:
::I'd think a bit of this might be worth looking into if it didn't appear to come from Mr. 2001. After a certain point a banned user throwing around wild accusations has no credibility. [[User:Smallbones|Smallbones]]<sub>(<font color="cc6600">[[User talk:Smallbones|smalltalk]]</font>)</sub> 04:08, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
:::Per usual, Smallbones, the truth will out, and you'll be left with that brown nose of yours. Saint Peter, hit the deck, man! Jimbo, do you approve of Martin Tiedemann (a Labour/Co-operative councillor) authoring content so closely tied [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Minerva_(property_firm)&diff=45838760&oldid=44863384 to the Labour party]'s Rosenfeld and Garrard (your new partner and his buddy)? It seems that Tiedemann did a fairly good job being objective on that edit, but wouldn't it just be better if he had kept "hands off" to avoid even the appearance of improper editing? - [[Special:Contributions/50.153.112.1|50.153.112.1]] ([[User talk:50.153.112.1|talk]]) 04:42, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
::::Some additional interesting edits that made sourced content disappear from David Garrard's BLP, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Garrard_%28property_developer%29&diff=137417904&oldid=137048354 here]. Garrard helped Jimbo's partner Rosenfeld make millions -- we wouldn't want his political scandal getting in the way of a pristine BLP, would we? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Garrard_(property_developer)&diff=148957566&oldid=137417904 This] was a really nifty edit, too. - [[Special:Contributions/50.153.112.1|50.153.112.1]] ([[User talk:50.153.112.1|talk]]) 04:53, 21 January 2014 (UTC)