[go: nahoru, domu]

Content deleted Content added
no more discussion on my talk page abouts Jatts ffs we have been through this nonsense
Line 959:
Hi, I'm just wondering if you could direct me to the discussion on "Jaat, Jatt, Jat, Jat" that is whether these are all the same. There are two editors on my talk page arguing about it. '''BE'''—<span style="background:black;color:white;padding:3px 8px 5px 0px;text-shadow:white 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;font-size:100%;">—'''Critical'''</span><sub>__[[User_talk:Becritical|Talk]]</sub> 01:37, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
:Hi fellow editor. Check all the references on the Jat people page. They are exactly the same people. This nonsense started a few years ago and we consensually decided to keep one page, titled Jat people. Thanks--[[User:Sikh-history|<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue;font-size:16px">Sikh-</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:goldenrod;font-size:16px">History</em>]] 10:03, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 
::not sure what you are refering to as nonsense do check the nonsense being written by jaats to create a false history for themselves. they are hoping around rajput articles claiming to be also part of rajput clans while in Punjab no Jatt does this. we have a well defined history. neither does our language resemble that of Jaats nor does our culture and music . what do Jaats have to do with Heer Ranjha Mirza Sahiba ? these were Muslim Jatts but loved by all Punjabi Jatts. All Jaats are doing is plagiarizing other peoples history. the guy from [[Jat]] said i am turning muslim Jatt history into the history of hindus?? which is absolute crap as i never even went into religion but rather quoted what is recored by british ethnographers on the Jatts of PUNJAB not jaat of haryana. anyway this has not ended here due to being extremely busy i must delay this mission for a while but when i am ready we will see who is a Jatt and who is a Jaaat|! --[[User:Qaleechpuri|Qaleechpuri]] ([[User talk:Qaleechpuri|talk]]) 14:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC)