You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, users are forced to use the predefined 5 level certainty scale (very low, low, medium, high, very high). However, some users might prefer to label these levels differently, or have a different number of levels. This is especially important, since some users prefer a scale with an even number of levels, as to avoid tending towards the middle one and instead being forced to decide between slightly above or below average.
Then we could also use for example Kent’s Words of Estimative Probability, which is a 6 level scale (Almost Certain, Probable, Chances About Even, Probably Not, Almost Certainly Not, Impossible).
Current Workaround
Somehow map your own scale to 5 levels.
Proposed Solution
Allow to define these terms as custom values, as well as have any amount of them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Problem to Solve
Currently, users are forced to use the predefined 5 level certainty scale (very low, low, medium, high, very high). However, some users might prefer to label these levels differently, or have a different number of levels. This is especially important, since some users prefer a scale with an even number of levels, as to avoid tending towards the middle one and instead being forced to decide between slightly above or below average.
Then we could also use for example Kent’s Words of Estimative Probability, which is a 6 level scale (Almost Certain, Probable, Chances About Even, Probably Not, Almost Certainly Not, Impossible).
Current Workaround
Somehow map your own scale to 5 levels.
Proposed Solution
Allow to define these terms as custom values, as well as have any amount of them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: