[go: nahoru, domu]

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Yocto build fails with RUST > 1.41 #59

Closed
ksaye opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Yocto build fails with RUST > 1.41 #59

ksaye opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@ksaye
Copy link
ksaye commented Jan 27, 2021

Describe the bug
When building with the master branch of meta-rust, the build fails with "ERROR: iotedge-cli-1.0.9.4-r0 do_compile: Execution of '/mnt/rpi/rpi-build/tmp/work/corei7-64-poky-linux/iotedge-cli/1.0.9.4-r0/temp/run.do_compile.28917' failed with exit code 101:"

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Install Ubuntu 18.04
  2. install the Ubuntu pre requisites
  3. Add the following layers:
git clone -b dunfell https://github.com/Azure/meta-iotedge.git
git clone -b dunfell git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-virtualization
git clone -b master git://github.com/meta-rust/meta-rust.git
git clone -b dunfell git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky
git clone -b dunfell git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded
git clone -b dunfell git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-intel

This works if I roll the meta-rust back to 1.41:

cd meta-rust
git checkout a012a1027defe28495f06ed522a7a82bdd59a610

Expected behavior
Build complete and not fail.

Logs
See attached log
dunfellintel-corei7-64.log

Build System (please complete the following information):

  • OS: Ubuntu
  • Version 18.04

Target System (please complete the following information):

  • OS: intel-corei7-64
  • Version [e.g. 22]

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

@shr-project
Copy link

see #49

@hurtadosanti
Copy link

In general, is best to use % or a specific tag from the layer. Specifying a version does not seem to be a good approach, anyway removing the bbappend is a better option if not needed.

@ksaye ksaye closed this as completed Jul 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants