[go: nahoru, domu]

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing AIP: Standard fields reference #238

Open
jgeewax opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Missing AIP: Standard fields reference #238

jgeewax opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels
aip: requested New AIP needed for a particular topic

Comments

@jgeewax
Copy link
Contributor
jgeewax commented Aug 8, 2019

We don't have the equivalent for https://cloud.google.com/apis/design/standard_fields AFAICT..

@jgeewax jgeewax added the aip: requested New AIP needed for a particular topic label Aug 8, 2019
@jgeewax jgeewax added this to To do in API Style Guide Migration via automation Aug 8, 2019
@lukesneeringer
Copy link
Contributor

Most of them got folded in to 140-143, but there are a few left over (uri, display_name) that either need to be incorporated into 140 or get their own AIP.

@jgeewax
Copy link
Contributor Author
jgeewax commented Feb 5, 2020

filter seems to be a common one being asked about. Should be part of the filtering syntax AIP.

@HarrisonGregg
Copy link

+1 The usage of display_name came up in a discussion, and I was surprised to not find any AIP with guidance that I could reference. https://cloud.google.com/apis/design/standard_fields will do for now though.

@bgrant0607
Copy link
Contributor

@shwoodard I believe this issue was addressed by https://google.aip.dev/148

@bgrant0607
Copy link
Contributor

Through https://google.aip.dev/140#display-names should be removed so that it doesn't get out of sync with https://google.aip.dev/148#other-names

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
aip: requested New AIP needed for a particular topic
Projects
No open projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants