-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 604
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stop supporting AMD in a version 2.0? #810
Comments
I'd love if globalize would go with a more modern module system. We can support both
|
Globalize not supporting ES modules is the only reason I'm not currently using it. I've been completely unable to get it to work with the latest version of Webpack. I think support for ES modules would bring a lot more people to the Globalize table and make using the library trivial for anyone who'd just found it. |
I'm very interested in this |
Awesome, 👍. Sounds good to me. Having said that, it's important to note this will cause conflicts to existing PRs, so we'll want to merge (at least) the ones listed on https://github.com/globalizejs/globalize/milestone/3 first. I have had very little bandwidth and any help reviewing these PRs and making sure they are good to merge are welcome. |
What’s the status on this to support a more modern module system as I saw nothing in the milestone link? Vitejs needs it for easier compiler building, and same as Angular projects wanting to use the new es build system. |
I believe nowadays everyone uses ES7 modules or commonJS (with a sort of webpack for the web) or are moving towards it.
The goal of this issue is to collect community feedback (if any) about moving this path forward.
Related issues:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: