I can understand that, and you might not be the only one. That being said the activity and number of releases particularly of the graphql-spring-boot project had drastically been reduced past two years already. Lack of time and contributors, but also that it doesn't seem to make sense to try to keep a project alive while Spring has more resources to maintain the official library. This project was necessary at first since an official library didn't exist yet, but now we'd rather focus and contribute in other areas instead of trying to compete with an official library.

@oryan-block is the primary maintainer of this graphql-java-tools project (which is also used by non-Spring projects) and best to align with him on both contributing and integrating with offical Spring libs. I am wondering though what you think the combination of graphql-java-tools with Spring for GraphQL would bring? How would it be different or better compared to just using Spring for GraphQL?

This project was necessary at first since an official library didn't exist yet, but now we'd rather focus and contribute in other areas instead of trying to compete with an official library.

This makes a lot of sense. I wish that they would've adopted the approach taken by you guys though. It's so much more usable...and already has many of the features that they still don't have yet. Did you guys ever have the opportunity to offer graphql-spring-boot features as contributions to Spring for GraphQL? I've never contributed to an official Spring project and can't seem to find a way to get in touch with the maintainers either other than logging issues with the project, which doesn't seem the appropriate avenue for such discussion.

I am wondering though what you think the combination of graphql-java-tools with Spring for GraphQL would bring? How would it be different or better compared to just using Spring for GraphQL?

This is a good point. It likely wouldn't bring anything at this point, unless it was used under the hood of Spring for GraphQL. I think I was in shock of the closing of the other project when I asked. :)

I haven't contributed myself, so not sure how open they are to contributions. However they do have a code of conduct which states they're open to it. Haven't read it all but maybe they have certain rules, like first create a feature request issue to get approval to make it part of the lib before you spend a lot of time implementing a PR that won't get merged in the end. See https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-graphql/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.adoc

I'd also check the pull request activity. Are there a lot of open PRs and how often do they merge PRs from external contributors? That might be a good indication if they're open to it.

I'd probably start with a feature request and indicating you're happy to contribute by creating a PR if they're open to it. If the above options don't already give you a clear path forward.

Unfortunately I can barely keep up with bugs and regular maintenance of this project. I don't really have time to look into what Spring is doing. As far as I know they just decided that this project doesn't jive with their plans so they're just ignoring it.