[go: nahoru, domu]

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pdb_fixinsert and its impact on numbering #110

Closed
aanastasiou opened this issue Sep 21, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

pdb_fixinsert and its impact on numbering #110

aanastasiou opened this issue Sep 21, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
users Input given by users

Comments

@aanastasiou
Copy link

Hello

I came across pdb_fixinsert and just wanted to confirm that my understanding of its operation is correct before I start using it more systematically.

The tool's help mentions that it "works by deleting an insertion code and shifting the residue numbering of downstream residues". Although "delete" appears here, the tool does not actually delete anything. Rather, it seems to be renaming the insertion code residue so that it disappears. So, in the case of 1,2,3,4,5,5A,6,7,8,9,10,.... it would turn it to 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,.... With 6 now being the 5A, 7 being the 6 and so on.

The number of residues does not change. The total number of lines (between the original and processed through pdb_fixinsert) does not change.

Is there a specific use case that pdb_fixinsert addresses and is the interpretation of the insertion codes context specific? My understanding from looking up more about the interpretation of insertion codes was that they encode more than one pieces of information: The position of the residue (and which residue it is) but also what else might appear in that index on the same molecule but a different species. I was therefore looking for a way to decouple these two pieces of information. Therefore, coming across pdb_fixinsert's description, I thought that it was going to remove those residues with insertion codes in a better way (than just deleting them).....but it only seems to renumber them.

Any help with this would be greatly appreciated.

@amjjbonvin
Copy link
Member
amjjbonvin commented Sep 21, 2021 via email

@aanastasiou
Copy link
Author

Thank you @amjjbonvin. Is that a generic treatment though? This means that the residues with the insertion codes are supposed to be part of the sequence. If they were, then why tag them differently in the first place?

@amjjbonvin
Copy link
Member
amjjbonvin commented Sep 22, 2021 via email

@joaomcteixeira joaomcteixeira added the users Input given by users label Jun 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
users Input given by users
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants