[go: nahoru, domu]

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cesium has more detailed tiles texture render on zoom #1853

Open
alexLuky opened this issue May 5, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Cesium has more detailed tiles texture render on zoom #1853

alexLuky opened this issue May 5, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@alexLuky
Copy link
alexLuky commented May 5, 2022

@gchoqueux @mgermerie

I faced with issue that itowns renders tiles textures much less detailed than cesium does from the same source.

Your Environment

  • itowns version used: 2.38.1
  • b3dm tiles
  • link to json: hided

Context

Here is cesium:
image

Here is itowns:
image

Also itowns has darker light wich makes the scene more nasty. How can I make it lighter? Should I use three,js light instances for this?

Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)

Here is the itowns code:

const tiles3dLayer = new itowns.C3DTilesLayer(datasetTilesSet3dObject.id, {
    name: datasetTilesSet3dObject.name,
    source: new itowns.C3DTilesSource({
      url: datasetTilesSet3dObject.url,
    }),
    sseThreshold: 1,
}, this.itownsViewer)
itowns.View.prototype.addLayer.call(this.itownsViewer, tiles3dLayer)

Expected Behavior

I expect that LOD will be increased to maxim while zooming. Now it looks like itowns just stops to update the LOD on zoom.

Any thoughts how can I achieve the same render quality as cesium does? I've attached the link to the source 3dTiles set for experiments.

@jailln
Copy link
Contributor
jailln commented Sep 7, 2022

see #1859 (comment)

@jailln jailln added this to the 2.xx.x milestone Oct 14, 2022
@mgermerie
Copy link
Contributor

The complete 3d-tiles support is planned in the short term road map. We are currently studying possibilities in terms of libraries to enhance support (as mentioned in #1917).

@jailln
Copy link
Contributor
jailln commented Nov 27, 2023

@alexLuky this should be resolved with #2143 , can you test it and let me know please?

@alexLuky
Copy link
Author

@jailln it's fantastic news. I surely would. Give me some time!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants