You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm benchmarking my aligner against minimap2 and got a reviewer comment about evaluating performance with (eventual) future Illumina chemistry X reads. I am therefore including longer simulated Illumina 2*500bp PE reads. I have so far run my experiments with -x sr. Perhaps the runtime/accuracy tradeoff could be better in minimap2 with different parameters on, e.g., k and w while still being in short-read PE alignment mode.
Any suggestions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @lh3,
I'm benchmarking my aligner against minimap2 and got a reviewer comment about evaluating performance with (eventual) future Illumina chemistry X reads. I am therefore including longer simulated Illumina 2*500bp PE reads. I have so far run my experiments with
-x sr
. Perhaps the runtime/accuracy tradeoff could be better in minimap2 with different parameters on, e.g.,k
andw
while still being in short-read PE alignment mode.Any suggestions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: