You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looking at the current WD of css-cascade-6 it still includes both the strong and weak scoping steps in the cascade. Since then, with the WG we settled on using only weak scoping, among a few other changes & additions, as listed in the changes:
I think it would be good to publish an updated WD as authors that read the WD will be confused: the thing that’s shipping in Safari and Chrome (and Firefox in the future) implements the cascade as currently described only in the ED, not the WD.
@astearns@atanassov - I think the changes here are all based on resolutions already, but we could get one here if needed. Maybe at the top of tomorrow's meeting, or async?
If all of the normative changes are backed by resolutions you can use https://wiki.csswg.org/spec/publish as the resolution link to publish a regular working draft (see step 2)
Looking at the current WD of css-cascade-6 it still includes both the strong and weak scoping steps in the cascade. Since then, with the WG we settled on using only weak scoping, among a few other changes & additions, as listed in the changes:
I think it would be good to publish an updated WD as authors that read the WD will be confused: the thing that’s shipping in Safari and Chrome (and Firefox in the future) implements the cascade as currently described only in the ED, not the WD.
Any concerns with this, @mirisuzanne?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: