Landesfilmsammlung
Beschreibungen
editDie Beschreibungen, die ihr erstellt, entsprechen nicht dem Wikidata-Stil (dokumentiert unter Help:Description/de#Werke). Sie sollten so geändert werden:
- “is a documentary” → “documentary”
- “ist ein Dokumentarfilm aus dem Jahr 2014.” → “Dokumentarfilm” oder, falls möglich, “Dokumentarfilm von Max Mustermann”
Insbesondere sollten Beschreibungen:
- nicht versuchen, Sätze zu bilden (Help:Description/de#Kein_Satz)
- keine Punkte enthalten (Help:Description#Punctuation)
Hi Landes ..
It seems that the bot flag is not working for all these population numbers.
--- Jura 13:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jura1,
thanks for your message - I will check the class script. Normally it should be set :-)
--Landesfilmsammlung (talk) 16:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Script seems to be okay,
do you have me a URL where I can see the unset bot-flag? My Revision-History of the edited entites doesn't show set/unset botflags.
Thank you --Landesfilmsammlung (talk) 16:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- If you can see the edit on https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&hidebots=1 then the bot flag isn't set.
- You can also watchlist an item and check if there is a "b" on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Watchlist?&hidebots=0
--- Jura 18:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Using Wikidata pages as a source
editThat's a really bad idea, in my opinion. Was there a consensus in favor of these edits? Using wiki pages as a source doesn't add anything, and worse, you're using unstructured URLs, which makes it even harder to work with. --Yair rand (talk) 21:22, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- No problem. Its the result of a bot request to add Connection-pairs like Parents <-> Children (inverse property (P1696)). How should I add a node as reference? Thanks in forward --Landesfilmsammlung (talk) 09:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- If the original statement already has a reference, then the reference can usually function in both directions, so copying it would make sense. --Yair rand (talk) 14:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Will the odd references created be cleaned? See Q6218126 that has as a father Q6218131 and the wrong reference added is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q6218131 that should be deleted!!! Wikidata has a problem with to many references to Wikipedia a good reference should be to an external trustworthy source and never to a wikidata object - Salgo60 (talk) 17:51, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Ich bin wenig erfreut über die über Euren User-Account kürzlich durchgezogene Revertierung beim Lemma Film. Die User-Description als Profi-Filminstitution verrät doch eigentlich, dass ihr fachlich versiert seid. Die Handlung hingegen zeigt, dass der betreffende Student/Mitarbeiter sich zu wenig mit der Sachlage auseinandergesetzt hat. Wie bei allen echten Einordnungsproblemen ist die Lage etwas unübesichtlich und uneindeutig. (Deswegen habe ich den leichtfertigen Revert rückgängig gemacht, um danach den unbefriedigenden Ursprung zurückzuholen.) Nein, es geht bei dieser Kategorie nicht wie behauptet um Film im Allgemeinen. Auch wenn die gegenwärtigen Q11424-Deskriptionen bei oberflächlichem Draufsehen das nahelegen. ABER eine solche Festlegung hat dann keinen analytisch-logischen Differenzierungswert mehr. Tatsächlich gibt es aus gutem Grund ein eigenes Datenobjekt Fernsehfilm, hingegen bislang nicht das logische Gegenstück 'Kinofilm'. Das wollte ich ändern, da ich - fachlich gestützt auf die Datenbanken IMDb und Filmportal - immer wieder auf die dort vorgenommene Unterscheidung treffe. Denn, das muss ich Medien/Filmwissenschaftlern wie Euch wohl nicht unter die Nase reiben, es gibt große Unterschiede zwischen TV- und Kino-Produktionen in puncto Ästhetik, Produktionsverhältnissen und Kontextbezügen. Auch wenn es aus der Not der Finanzierungszwänge geboren häufig hybride Mischformen gibt, ist die Unterscheidung angebracht und fachlich üblich. Kinofilm als "auch bekannt als" von 'Film' ist schlicht kontraproduktiv, denn die Arbeit bei Wikidata beruht auf Ausdifferenzierung via klaren, eindeutigen Unterscheidungsmerkmalen. 'Film' ist ein Sammelbegriff für alles mögliche Audiovisuelle, 'Kinofilm' hingegen ist ein sinnvoller sachlicher Alternativbegriff zu 'Fernsehfilm'. Abschließend für den Umgang in Wikidata bitte ich darum, dass Eure Mitarbeiter die Schaltfläche des 'Rückgängig machens' nur bei klarem Vandalismus benutzen, da leichtfertiges Benutzen Ärger erzeugt. -- Fazit: Ich möcht Euch hiermit auffordern, im Institut mal zu mehr als zwei Fachleuten über das von mir geschilderte Problem zu debattieren und gemeinsam zu klären, ob Ihr meine Position ('Kinofilm' statt 'Film') nicht zukünftig unterstützen solltet. -- Justus Nussbaum (talk) 14:22, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Is this bot still needed? You should transclude it to Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot.--GZWDer (talk) 16:59, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- It's already confirmed. And yes. We get the population-data only once a year and the relationship-task is running weekly.
Stop adding bad sources
editPlease read help:sources and respect the policy about sourcing in WD. Snipre (talk) 17:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
- Can you please explain the problem concretly, so that we can correct the problem.
prefferred rank bitte!!!!
editHi! Ich habe viele Article in Ungarn Wikipedia gemacht. Aber jetz sehr viele is schlegt. Z.B.:[1]. Bitte mache eine preferred rank, und Ungarn Wikipedia ist auch gut. Danke! --B.Zsolt (talk) 22:12, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
P248
editHi, Landesfilmsammlung! I think stated in (P248) is not intended to be used with every Wikidata item (only items representing books, articles, maybe databases...). For statements imported from Wikipedia -> imported from Wikimedia project (P143). Probably the best approach would be copying the source included in the original statement. If it exists, of course. If you can correct that it would be awesome! Thanks for your edits! Strakhov (talk) 15:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi again! In these cases imported from Wikimedia project (P143) should be used with Q20651139. Strakhov (talk) 19:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Father, not mother
editDanzig is the father of Danehill, not the mother. Please check your script. See the following revision: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q1005468&type=revision&diff=342642953&oldid=342639436
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
editHello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
edit(Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Städte Einwohner und Fläche
editHi Landesfilmsammler,
danke für das Einfügen von Einwohnerzahlen bei verschiedenen Gemeinden in Ba-Wü. Ich würde dies gern auch bei einigen Gemeinden durchführen. Kannst Du Dich deswegen mal bitte bei mir melden.
Vielen Dank vorab.
Viele Grüße
LandesfilmsammlungBot
editYour bot has been listed at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Removal/Inactive bot accounts 2 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure it's proposed to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot should you need it again. Of course, You may request retaining your bot flag here if you need the bot flag. Regards--GZWDer (talk) 17:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)