Program Capacity and Learning/Annual Plan
Supplemental description page for 2016-2017 Wikimedia Foundation Annual Plan
Grow and Scale Mature Wikimedia Programs including Education and Libraries with Capacity Building Tools and Resources
[edit]Programs are key to growth of contributors and content, connecting people to people and people to content. These initiatives will help program leaders fail and learn quickly while replicating what works broadly. We will ease the time wasted searching for, or not finding, tools and resources through a single entry point, a central knowledge hub called the "Wikimedia Resource Center". Other Program and Learning Infrastructure components include a Program and Events dashboard which allows program leaders to design, deliver and evaluate programs with ease through semi-automated, supportive tools and infrastructure. This objective also includes supporting grantees and the FDC decision making process through improved knowledge and reporting on program outcomes.
Benefits
[edit]- Creates a single-point of entry and one-stop shop for Wikimedia resources for the communities. Will increase search and findability of all curated resources and allow for connecting people to people and people to content for scale.
- Provides programmatic management tools and data across content-producing programs
- Reduces volunteer and staff time in running and evaluating programs
- Provides data capture on programs across multiple global communities.
- Provides support to applicants in writing and measuring quality objectives for their proposed projects and events.
- Provides support to decisions toward program effectiveness and guidance for development and decision-making.
Alignment to...
[edit]- Knowledge #2: “Expand content faster through enabling community-led content partnership programs such as GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums).”
- Knowledge #3: "Increase content quality and timeliness by technologically enhancing our editors’ ability to create, monitor, and process content."
- Communities #2: “Create and support programs to increase volunteer participation such as recognition, facilitated mentorship, and personalized reengagement.”
Logic Model
[edit]
Situation | ||||
Programs are key to growth of contributors and content, connecting people to people and people to content. This initiative focuses on supporting programs moving in the grow to scale phase of development focusing on how to best support scalable solutions to supporting program effectiveness. | ||||
Priorities | ||||
| ||||
Inputs Project & Resources | ||||
Development of a central hub, "Wikimedia Resource Center" (project page) and continued support to other program and learning Infrastructure. | ||||
Outputs Activities & Direct Products | ||||
| ||||
Outcome Targets | ||||
Programs & Events Dashboard
Wikimedia Resource Center
Grants Consultation and Learning Support
|
Staff Support to AffCom and Affiliate Partnerships
[edit]- Partnership with our affiliates is key to our movement wide success. This objective includes staff support to the AffCom committee including Affiliate review and application/reporting guidance, as well as technical evaluation support to grantees and affiliates.
- While this work will also appear under "strategic" building trust, transparency and partnership between Affiliates and WMF is core workflow. The Team will coordinate with core group to inform strategic expansions
Benefits
[edit]- Ensures timely response to emerging communities in their application process.
- Provides proactive compliance monitoring and assists affiliates to keep up with required reporting.
- Helps to maintain accurate records of our worldwide affiliate and program partners.
- Supports best practices and learning exchange to deliver best use of shared movement resources.
- WMF staff and community leaders reach better decisions in a collaborative way
- Helps ensure quality in evaluation of grant-funded projects and events to insure targeted investment in impactful programs.
- Provides orientation and recognition of recognized affiliate partners
- Ensures consistent messaging and awareness of affiliate business to ensure appropriate WMF response to needs and opportunities
Alignment to...
[edit]- Communities #2: “Create and support programs to increase volunteer participation such as recognition, facilitated mentorship, and personalized reengagement.”
- Reach #2: "Improve our understanding of how and why our users come to and stay on our projects so we can better serve their needs."
Logic Model
[edit]
Situation | ||||
Partnership with our affiliates is key to our movement wide success. This initiative focuses on supporting and coordinating affiliate partnerships through staff support to the Affiliations Committee leveraging them more as peer leaders. | ||||
Priorities | ||||
| ||||
Inputs Project & Resources | ||||
AffCom support and annual plan grantee support for program capacity, evaluation, and learning. | ||||
Outputs Activities & Direct Products | ||||
| ||||
Outcome Targets | ||||
|
Staff support for GLAM partnerships
[edit]A GLAM Wiki strategist will support local communities with core support for GLAM initiatives. The coordinator will work to facilitate knowledge-sharing across the movement to enable community-led GLAM content partnerships. While support may extend to other knowledge partnerships such as STEM, priority will be placed on the underserved and documented need of GLAM partnerships to drive Wikimedia content and quality growth. The coordinator role will support project management of GLAM tool development, learning resources for GLAM partnerships, support and mentoring of new GLAM coordinators, and connecting GLAM partners approaching the Wikimedia Foundation to our local communities and movement-wide GLAM initiatives.
Benefit:
[edit]- Project management for critical GLAM tools
- Documentation of best practices
- Technical consultation to GLAM program leaders
- Support for connecting interested GLAM partners and local communities.
Alignment to...
[edit]- Knowledge #2: “Expand content faster through enabling community-led content partnership programs such as GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums).”
- Knowledge #3: "Increase content quality and timeliness by technologically enhancing our editors’ ability to create, monitor, and process content."
- Communities #2: “Create and support programs to increase volunteer participation such as recognition, facilitated mentorship, and personalized reengagement.”
Logic Model
[edit]
Situation | ||||
Partnerships with Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums (GLAM) is a largely under-resourced yet high-impact program area. In both WMF strategy and Program Capacity & Learning roadmap consultations, our community pointed to the potential for growth of GLAM partnership program if properly supported by WMF with tools and programmatic support. | ||||
Priorities | ||||
| ||||
Inputs Project & Resources | ||||
Programmatic Support and Infrastructure for GLAM initiatives. | ||||
Outputs Activities & Direct Products | ||||
| ||||
Outcome Targets | ||||
Improve GLAM-Wiki knowledge access and organization
Complete structured GLAM-Wiki consultation to direct the scope of technical needs and plan for technical resources to be allocated within movement organizations or external partners and/or championed by volunteers Support GLAM-Wiki and other content partnership needs brought to WMF
Identify existing GLAM-Wiki leadership development strategies and curriculums within existing GLAM-WIKI communities, and develop “best practices” for training new GLAM-Wiki Leaders in currently unsupported communities. |
Community Leadership Development
[edit]The strength of our community leaders to grow Wikimedia Content and Contributors is a fundamental strategic pillar. This initiative supports the development and recognition of peer mentors in local communities to grow content and contributors through investment in learning, development and recognition of regional and thematic program leaders. This initiative focuses on data-informed decision making and community insights as key to both WMF resourcing and movement wide learning. We aim to achieve scale by training more leaders and then training standout leaders to teach others in a train-the-trainers model.
This project includes support for Community Listening capacity support along with Peer Leadership Academy as well as in-person and virtual knowledge sharing events for movement learning to exchange best practices in planning, implementing, and evaluating Wikimedia projects and programs.
Benefits
[edit]- Program leaders will be added as regional mentors to grow editors and content in their region through Wikimedia Programs.
- In addition to serving as regional mentors, the cohort will work on a collaborative project to benefit Wikimedia programs. (Creation of capacity tools)
- Sustainability: Mentors will train/develop second cohort, and that cohort will train another, and so on, with WMF playing a lighter and lighter support role
- Increased effectiveness and impact of program leaders and affiliates to grow quality content and contributors around the world
Alignment to...
[edit]- Communities #2: “Create and support programs to increase volunteer participation such as recognition, facilitated mentorship, and personalized reengagement.”
- Reach #2: "Improve our understanding of how and why our users come to and stay on our projects so we can better serve their needs."
Logic Model
[edit]
Situation | ||||
The volunteer community has a wide range of experience and potential leaders, however, there have been very few efforts to help grow natural skills and support them with leadership resources. Wikimedia’s program staff and budget has limited capacity to serve the entire global community. Local volunteer leaders will increase program reach and impact through local context and community connection and provide additional program capacity in major regions of the world through recruitment and training of regional volunteers. | ||||
Priorities | ||||
| ||||
Inputs Project & Resources | ||||
Peer mentoring will invest in people power to get beyond the Wikimedia Foundation's current capacity limitations to provide support to emerging program leaders, in major regions of the world through recruitment and training of regional volunteers. Community Listening Capacity development and infrastructure supports to support programs and affiliate partnerships in sharing knowledge about the communities we serve and data for decision-making. Peer Leadership Academy A community mentor development pipeline through training-of-trainers and mentoring support. Learning and Knowledge Sharing
| ||||
Outputs Activities & Direct Products | ||||
| ||||
Outcome Targets | ||||
300 or more community leaders supported directly through
|
Global Metrics
[edit]Metric | |
1. Number of active editors involved | 2500+ unique TWL users/quarter + (Indirect) Programs & Events Dashboard when ready |
2. Number of newly registered users | * |
3. Number of individuals involved | 200+ program and community leaders served quarterly
2500+ TWL (indirect reach with notation once dashboard) 300+ community leaders engaged in leadership development |
4. Number of new images/media added to Wikimedia article pages | * |
5. Number of articles added or improved on Wikimedia projects | * |
6. Number of bytes added to and/or deleted from Wikimedia projects | * |
7. Learning question: Did your work increase the motivation of contributors, and how do you know? | see KPIs below |
* Indirect. Can report from Programs & Events dashboard in the future.
KPIs
[edit]Resource Engagement
[edit]KPI (*measured quarterly, however some have annual cyclical relationships) | Rationale | Metric from FY15/16
Q1 |
Metric from FY15/16
Q2 |
Metric from FY15/16
'Q3' |
Portal Resource Unique Editors |
Tells us the number of community members supporting general shared resource development | 239 | 102 | 152 |
Portal Resource Pageviews |
Gives us a basic proxy for information accessed the most so that we can understand trends in learning resource needs | 61,354 | 30,766 | 22,464 |
Learning Patterns Unique Editors |
Tells us the number of community members supporting this specific shared resource development | 111 | 66 | 77 |
Learning Patterns Created |
Tells us the number of newly created patterns each quarter | 75 | 47 | 50 |
Number of wikis using Education Program MediaWiki Extension (Projects, Languages) | Gives a proxy for our global reach for monitoring and evaluation | 18 (5, 16) | 20 (5, 18) | 20 (5,18) |
The Wikipedia Library
[edit]KPI (*measured quarterly, however some have annual cyclical relationships) | Rationale | Metric from FY15/16
Q1 |
Metric from FY15/16
Q2 |
Metric from FY15/16
Q3 |
TWL Donation partners | Tells us how many partners are donating accounts for reference resources | 42 | 50 | 57 |
TWL Accounts distributed | Tells us the number free accounts shared with active editors each quarter | 4,707 | 5,342 | 5,637 |
TWL Unique recipients | Tells us the number of active editors served by free accounts each quarter | 2,384 | 2,598 | 2,683 |
TWL Sign-up
efficiency (avg) |
Tells us a quarterly average of how long it took to get editors access to accounts | 53 days | 33 days | 40 days |
TWL Citations added to partners | Tells us the number of citations added to partners content | 13,383 | 15,042 | 19,353 |
TWL Global branches | Tells us how many branches of the library have been created on local wikis | 11 | 15 | 20 |
TWL Library coordinators | Tells us how many volunteer coordinators are supporting the global branches | 40 | 51 | 55 |
Mentoring & Consultation
[edit]KPI (*measured quarterly, however some have annual cyclical relationships) | Rationale | Metric from FY15/16
Q1 |
Metric from FY15/16
Q2 |
Metric from FY15/16
Q3 |
Program/Community Leaders direct engagments |
Tells us the number of community members we spent 15 or more minutes supporting directly each quarter | 372 (185 L&E + 187 Education) | 325 (96 L&E + 229 Education) | 310 (200 L&E +110 Education) |
Program/Community Leaders engaged via workshops |
Tells us the number of community members we engaged in workshops each quarter | 100 | 10 | 113 |
Country Count of Community Leaders directly engaged |
Tells us how far reaching our directly support is globally | 61 | 85 | 48 |
Referrals made by Education Team to other community members | Tells us how many peer mentor opportunities we have referred to the communities | 43 | 41 | 8 |
Number of tasks claimed and (completed) by Education Collab members on Phabricator | Tells us how many referral opportunities our community mentors responded to (completed) | 39 (18) | 41 (30) | 50 (23) |
Evaluation Design Consultations | Tells us how many community leaders were supported with evaluation design consultation | 34 | 11 | 42 |
Evaluation Tools and Reporting | Tells us how many community leaders were supported with evaluation tools/tech consultation | 17 | 6 | 65 |
Storytelling and Reporting | Tells us how many community leaders were supported with reporting and storytelling consultation | not available | 38 | 106 |
Survey Design Consultations | Tells us how many community leaders were supported with survey design and/or tools consultation | 25 | 13 | 9 |
Qualtrics users consulted (surveys) | Tells us how many leaders we supported with Qualtrics license and the number of surveys run | 47 (39) | 12 new (36) | 6 new (24) |