[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
Mahdiz (talk | contribs)
Line 199: Line 199:


: {{ok}} —[[User:MarcoAurelio|Marco]][[User talk:MarcoAurelio|Aurelio]] 19:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
: {{ok}} —[[User:MarcoAurelio|Marco]][[User talk:MarcoAurelio|Aurelio]] 19:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

==== Mahdiz@fa.wikipedia ====
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|domain = fa.wikipedia
|user name = mahdiz
|discussion=
}}
please remove my sysop right. unfortunately i can't active right now. thanks <code style="background:Green">:)</code>[[User:Mahdiz|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:blue;color:black"><i>Mahdi</i></font>]] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">[[user_talk:Mahdiz|talk]]</span></sup> 18:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


=== Miscellaneous requests ===
=== Miscellaneous requests ===

Revision as of 18:35, 17 February 2016

Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- Don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- Such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== User name@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

Pxos@fiwikiversity

Temporary adminship at Finnish Wikiversity for three more months until 28 May 2016. Local announcment has been in place since 9 February 2016. At present the rights will expire soon --Pxos (talk) 09:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

শাহাদাত সায়েম@bnwikibooks

Another admin request passed a week. So far 4 supports and no opposes. — T. 09:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2016-08-16. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks.. Linedwell (talk) 10:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Linedwell I have finished a local election for be an admin. Look here. In this election I also passed, so, I want to be permanent admin. Thanks --শাহাদাত সায়েম (talk) 10:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@শাহাদাত সায়েম: I know, but we cannot give permanent adminship after an election with such a few votes. That's why you have a 6 month adminship, renewable as long as necessary. Regards, Linedwell (talk) 13:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vadgt@hywikibooks

No oppose vote in voting. --Vadgt (talk) 00:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2016-08-17. —MarcoAurelio 14:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Baljeet Bilaspur@pawikipedia

No oppose in 7 days. Satdeep Gill (talk) 10:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2016-05-17. Ruslik (talk) 17:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

See Bureaucrat for information about this user group.
  • In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.
  • A small project does not need bureaucrats. Currently whether a promotion is valid or not is decided by stewards. See here for a guideline.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

CheckUser access

See CheckUser policy for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.
  • To request CheckUser information, see Steward requests/Checkuser. This is the place to request CheckUser access.
  • One-time CheckUser access is not permitted and temporary access is only used by Stewards or when the mandate of the CUs has an expiry date specified in local policies.


Oversight access

See Oversight policy for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.
  • To request to have content oversighted, ask for a steward in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and contact a steward privately. This section is for requesting access to the Oversight tool.
  • For contact details about oversighters across the wikis, refer to this page.
  • Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and temporary status is only used by Stewards .

  • When a new user is assigned to this group, please add them to this list.

-jem-@eswiki

Hi. Per local consensus, please grant -jem- oversight access. Confidentiality agreement will be signed as soon as possible. Matiia (talk) 00:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold. Pending signature of the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information. RadiX 00:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already signed in Phabricator, waiting for processing and Noticeboard confirmation. Thanks in advance. -jem- (talk) 00:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Ajraddatz (talk) 02:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of access

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see previous discussion on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a separate list of these specific wikis.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy Admin activity review applies.
  • See the instructions above for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.

Deskana@en.wikipedia

For the Arbitration Committee, --Guerillero 04:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Ajraddatz (talk) 05:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Postrach@cs.wikipedia

Last log action more than six months ago (per cs:Wikipedie:Žádost o práva správce#Odebrání práv v případě dlouhodobé neaktivity). Please remove his sysop rights. Thank you. 185.45.13.154 14:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to contact that admin first and ask if he needs the rights.--Juandev (talk) 21:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like they were contacted already 5 days ago, and they didn't respond. And what's going on at here? Per the link above "Neprovede-li správce po dobu delší než půl roku žádnou zaznamenanou akci, k níž jsou potřeba práva správce, může kdokoliv požádat stevardy, aby tomuto správci byla z důvodu neaktivity správcovská práva odebrána" --> <Google Translate> "Fails if an administrator for more than half a year, no recorded the action to which the need for administrator rights, anyone can ask the stewards to this manager was due to inactivity administrative privileges revoked." I think we are safe to remove their administrator rights. --Stryn (talk) 16:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

K123456@cs.wikipedia

Last log action more than six months ago (per cs:Wikipedie:Žádost o práva správce#Odebrání práv v případě dlouhodobé neaktivity). Please remove her sysop rights. Thank you. 185.45.13.154 14:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to contact that admin first and ask if he needs the rights.--Juandev (talk) 21:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bellayet @ Bengali Wikisource

This site has no bureaucrat. As per local policy, access removal process should be initiated if the admin is inactive for one year. Attempt should be made to contact the sysop by various means and community to decide if the sysop does not respond within six months. More than two years have elapsed since his last edit on December 22, 2013, which is more than the maximum inactivity time without community review as per global policy. User was informed on his Bengali Wikipedia talk page, where he is regularly active. He has ignored the information and has continued editing Bengali Wikipedia. So, removal of access is requested. Thanks, Hrishikes (talk) 06:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Global policy does not apply. AAR is reviewed one time a year and this will be checked in due time. The local inactivity process for admins on bn.wikisource seems to be added by Jayantanth last October. Was there a vote on this? If the local policy is good, then Bellayet needs to be informed 6 months before removal. In the link you provide you inform him last month. Was he informed before this? Please give a link where Bellayet was informed. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 06:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Link here. Informed on January 22. No local AAR is being done. No, he was not informed before. Thanks, Hrishikes (talk) 06:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
AAR for 2015 is being done right now. The AAR can check if he wants to stay active as admin. Otherwise according to bn.wikisource policy we would have to wait another 5 months. I suggest waiting for the AAR, or the 5 months, whichever applies first, and no further action right now. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 07:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If there is any local inactivity policy, AAR does not apply. --Rschen7754 18:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greudin@fr.wikibooks

Greudin is inactive on Wikibooks for more than three years: no edition & no log entry. So please remove his bureaucrat and administrator status. JackPotte (talk) 11:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am a little hesistant. the policy was approved with the sole vote of you, and as you tell in your talk page, you are not sure why the policy was not enacted back then. This is not an outright rejection of the request though. —MarcoAurelio 16:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Formica rufa@it.wikipedia

I request the removal of my sysop rights. Thanks in advance for your help.--Formica rufa (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On hold for 24 hours. Ajraddatz (talk) 08:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done, thanks for your service. Ajraddatz (talk) 08:44, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matt314 @ Wikimedia Commons

Please kindly remove administrator privileges from the account of Matt314 on Commons. They requested that the flag be removed during the currently ongoing admin inactivity run. It has been over 36 hours since the request was posted, so the rights can be removed at your earliest convenience. Thank you! odder (talk) 12:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DoneMarcoAurelio 14:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, @MarcoAurelio. odder (talk) 14:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lupo @ Wikimedia Commons

Similar to the request immediately above, could we please have admin privileges removed from Lupo's account on Commons. Lupo requested that the rights be removed during the current Commons admin inactivity run. However, could this please only be done after 06:51 UTC tomorrow (17 February) as per usual procedure to give the user 24 hours to perhaps reconsider their decision. Thanks, odder (talk) 14:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold until 17-02-2016@06:51 (UTC). —MarcoAurelio 14:42, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
DoneMarcoAurelio 14:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Otrfan@fi.wikiquote

Per the approved inactivity criteria on Finnish Wikiquote, "Sysop status will be removed after one year of total inactivity (i.e. no edits or log actions in the last 12 months)."
For user Otrfan: last edit 1 February 2014; last log action 12 February 2014, so Otrfan has been inactive for 2 years already. --Pxos (talk) 18:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DoneMarcoAurelio 19:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mahdiz@fa.wikipedia

please remove my sysop right. unfortunately i can't active right now. thanks :)Mahdi talk 18:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

Requests for permissions that don't fit in other sections belong here. Importer rights can be granted on most wikis by stewards only. Please gain local community consensus before posting a new section here.

Note that the following types of permissions requests belong on separate pages:

  • SRB — Local or global bot status
  • SRGP — Global permissions

User bachounda@arwikipedia and bachounda@frwikipedia

to don't have problem of creation account limited generally to maximum of six according to the information I have i request to have a grant to create account for other editors during the training workshops of wikipedia in both wikipedia arabic and french thanks --Mohammed Bachounda (talk) 08:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any discussion or consensus regarding this? —MarcoAurelio 19:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also