View source for Grants:Project/Rapid/Addis Wang - UGCN/Wikipedia Asian Month 2016/Report

==Outcome==
''Please report on your original project targets.''

{{Project/Rapid/Report/Table/Header1}}
<!---Please use the below table to:
1. List each of your original targets from your project plan.
2. List the actual outcome that was achieved.
3. Explain how your outcome compares with the original target.  Did you reach your targets?  Why or why not? --->

<!--2 rows for your table have been provided below.  To add more rows for additional goals, just copy and paste another row template below these-->
{{PEG/Proposals/Reports/Final/Table/1/Row
| target outcome = 50 Wikipedia projects
| achieved outcome = 48 Wikipedia projects + 2 Wikisource Projects
| explanation = We have more than 50 Wikimedia Projects participate, while only 50 of them have the outcome
}}

{{PEG/Proposals/Reports/Final/Table/1/Row
| target outcome = 1,500 Wikipedians involved
| achieved outcome = 734 Wikipedians wrote at least one articles + more than 50 local organizers
| explanation = We did not count people who just signed up as we did last time. Otherwise it will be some number around 2,000
}}

{{PEG/Proposals/Reports/Final/Table/1/Row
| target outcome = 7,000 high-quality articles
| achieved outcome = 7,970 high-quality articles
| explanation = 
}}

{{PEG/Proposals/Reports/Final/Table/1/Row
| target outcome = 15 Offline Edit-a-thon
| achieved outcome = 9
| explanation = Lack of human resource organizing it
}}

<!--Leave the template that follows when you have added all of your goals-->
{{PEG/Proposals/Reports/Final/Table/1/End}}

===After Event Survey===
;This survey only target participants who wrote more than 4 qualified articles. Total responses are 449, approximately 400 response are valid.
* 12.9% are female editors
* 12.9% editors have less than 1-year editing experience, 45.9% have more than 5-year-experience
* 32.2% editors learn this event by invitation/talk page message, 59.9% by Central Notice
* 63% editors rate "Fountain" 1 or 2 (out of 7, 1 is very good), 74.8% rate 1, 2 or 3 (out of 7)
* 83.6% editors express that they will keep contributing to Asian content 
* 93.2% editors would like to receive updates on next WAM
* 46.2% editors willing to be an organizer next time
====Specific Feedback to Fountain====
; The suggestions are randomly listed, no priority by the order. 
* wmflab is not stable, broken many times in different regions, sometimes crashed. some back up?  (Top request from the participants)
* Not very efficient
* should be able to add multiple articles at once
* Would be better if expanded articles can include
* Sometimes some browser has error message 
* turning redirects into articles
* remove submissions (maybe at least on organizer's interface)
* Realtime statistics, one suggest global top 10 scores, wmcharts
* Make a statement in the tool, that imagine, template does not count into words
* The tool should not accept articles that are less than 300 words
* Mobile-friendly
* Small bug: <nowiki>Links to articles with titles finishing with a "?" were broken (example on French contest: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/O!RUL8,2%3F was redirected to https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/O!RUL8,2)</nowiki>
* participants can rename the entries
* what if the article is deleted, maybe auto-checking it and mark it?
* Use AJAX to avoid switching pages when adding articles,  Add articles on the main page directly
* Direct language selector via parameter in URL
* Allow user to submit article even if machine does not allow that (Addis: I would say at least allow organziers do it for users in case of tool error etc)
* Allow extra-days to submit articles
* A notification via talk page once a day when an organizer evaluates the article 
* Recent actions