[go: nahoru, domu]

nLab retract (Rev #9)

Contents

Definition

An object AA in a category is a retract of an object BB if there are morphisms i:ABi:A\to B and r:BAr:B\to A such that ri=1 Ar \circ i = 1_A.

In this situation, rr is a split epimorphism and ii is a split monomorphism; the composite iri \circ r is a split idempotent. Sometimes rr is called a retraction of ii and ii is called a section of rr; these terms come from topology. The whole thing may also be called a splitting of ii, rr, or iri \circ r.

Properties

  • Retracts are clearly preserved by any functor.

  • A split epimorphism r;BAr; B \to A is the strongest of various notions of epimorphism (e.g., it is a regular epimorphism, in fact an absolute? coequalizer, being the coequalizer of a pair (e,1 B)(e, 1_B) where e=ir:BBe = i \circ r: B \to B is idempotent). Dually, a split monomorphism is the strongest of various notions of monomorphism.

Proposition

If an object BB has the left lifting property against a morphism XYX \to Y, then so does every of its retracts ABA \to B:

( Y A Y):=( Y A B A Y) \left( \array{ && Y \\ & {}^{\mathllap{\exists}}\nearrow& \downarrow \\ A &\to& Y } \right) \;\;\;\; := \;\;\;\; \left( \array{ && && && Y \\ &&& {}^{\mathllap{\exists}}\nearrow& && \downarrow \\ A &\to& B &\to& A &\to& Y } \right)
Proposition

Let CC be a category with split idempotents and write PSh(C)=[C op,Set]PSh(C) = [C^{op}, Set] for its presheaf category. Then a retract of a representable functor F=PSh(C)F = PSh(C) is itself representable.

This appears as (Borceux, lemma 6.5.6)

Proposition

Let CC and JJ be categories. Let F:JCF : J \to C be a diagram with limit lim jF j{\lim_\leftarrow}_j F_j, regarded as a diagram lim F:J C\lim_\leftarrow F : J^{\triangleleft} \to C. Then if G:J CG : J^{\triangleleft} \to C is another such cone diagram and GiFpGG \stackrel{i}{\to} F \stackrel{p}{\to} G is a retraction, then also GG is a limiting diagram

Proof

We check the universal property of the limit: let constQGconst Q \to G be any other cone over GG. Then constQGiFconst Q \to G \stackrel{i}{\to} F is a cone over FF. So there is a unique morphism constQlim Fconst Q \to \lim_\leftarrow F and hence a cone morphism constQlim FG(*)const Q \to \lim_\leftarrow F \to G(*). Similarly one sees that this is unique, by the fact that ii is a monomorphism.

Examples

Of simplices

The includion of standard topological horns into the topological simplex Λ k nΔ n\Lambda^n_k \hookrightarrow \Delta^n is a retract in Top.

In arrow categories

In the theory of weak factorization systems and model categories, an important role is played by retracts in C 2C^{\mathbf{2}}, the arrow category of CC. Explicitly spelled out in terms of the original category CC, a morphism f:XYf:X\to Y is a retract of a morphism g:ZWg:Z\to W if we have commutative squares

X Z X f g f Y W Y\array{X & \to & Z & \to & X\\ f \downarrow & & g \downarrow & & \downarrow f\\ Y & \to & W & \to & Y}

such that the top and bottom rows compose to identities.

References

In

the definition appears as def. 1.7.3. Properties are discussed in section 6.5

Revision on April 29, 2011 at 10:09:20 by Urs Schreiber See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.