An object in a category is a retract of an object if there are morphisms and such that .
In this situation, is a split epimorphism and is a split monomorphism; the composite is a split idempotent. Sometimes is called a retraction of and is called a section of ; these terms come from topology. The whole thing may also be called a splitting of , , or .
Retracts are clearly preserved by any functor.
A split epimorphism is the strongest of various notions of epimorphism (e.g., it is a regular epimorphism, in fact an absolute? coequalizer, being the coequalizer of a pair where is idempotent). Dually, a split monomorphism is the strongest of various notions of monomorphism.
If an object has the left lifting property against a morphism , then so does every of its retracts :
Let be a category with split idempotents and write for its presheaf category. Then a retract of a representable functor is itself representable.
This appears as (Borceux, lemma 6.5.6)
Let and be categories. Let be a diagram with limit , regarded as a diagram . Then if is another such cone diagram and is a retraction, then also is a limiting diagram
We check the universal property of the limit: let be any other cone over . Then is a cone over . So there is a unique morphism and hence a cone morphism . Similarly one sees that this is unique, by the fact that is a monomorphism.
The includion of standard topological horns into the topological simplex is a retract in Top.
In the theory of weak factorization systems and model categories, an important role is played by retracts in , the arrow category of . Explicitly spelled out in terms of the original category , a morphism is a retract of a morphism if we have commutative squares
such that the top and bottom rows compose to identities.
In
the definition appears as def. 1.7.3. Properties are discussed in section 6.5
Revision on April 29, 2011 at 10:09:20 by Urs Schreiber See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.