Jak byl tento dokument citován

"Governmental corporations then, from the highest to the lowest, can commit wrongful acts through their authorized agents for which they are responsible; and the only question is, how that responsibility shall be enforced. The obvious answer is, in courts of justice, where, by the law, they can be sued."
- – Oklahoma City v. Tuttle, 1985 a 5 podobných citací
—is directly in point, and clearly states the reasons why a municipal corporation is held liable in trespass for a direct wrong as well as in case for negligence of its agents.
- – Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Rhode Island a jedna podobná citace
—holds that a municipal corporation may be held liable for trespass; and the judgment must be affirmed.
Thus, an action will lie against a town or city for a trespass committed under its authority upon the real estate of another.
—city found liable for actions of city supervisor who trespassed on plaintiff's land to construct roadway pursuant to an ordinance
—an order was made, directing the opening of a street over property which had not been condemned, nor the right of way granted to the city, and the acts of trespass were in executing this order.
The entry upon appellant's property by appellee's agents and the demolition of the stairway was a trespass for which appellee is liable in the absence of a showing it acted in the exercise of a governmental function.
—maintained against a corporation for the tortious acts of its agents or officers, in relation to the property or real estate of another.
When the injury is direct, the action should be trespass against a corporation as well as an individual.
The principle of liability is, therefore, well established on a line of authority which has not been questioned.

Citace:

471 US 808 - Supreme Court 1985
A MOSES - Tax Law (Sup. Ct. of Tennessee, June 7, 1892 …
F DISTRICT -
I Shapiro - 2011
J Rehnquist - 1986
JA Dooley - (No Title), 1977
A FuLLER… - Law Rev, 1942