Wikidata:Property proposal/number of rooms
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
number of rooms
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Description | number of rooms in a building |
---|---|
Represents | room (Q180516) |
Data type | Quantity |
Domain | building (Q41176) |
Allowed values | probably between 1 and 3000 |
Example 1 | Palace of Fontainebleau (Q201428) → >1500 ref |
Example 2 | Winchester Mystery House (Q608039) → 160 ref |
Example 3 | Palace of Versailles (Q2946) → 2300 ref |
See also | floors above ground (P1101), floors below ground (P1139) |
Motivation
[edit]When I created Château Arthur-Osmore-Norton (Q99647013), I realised there is no properties about the number of rooms of a building. Could be a good complement to floors above ground (P1101). Fralambert (talk) 21:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Notified participants of WikiProject Built heritage
Discussion
[edit]Support This property is absolutely useful for structuring data correctly and especially for being able to have the perception of the size of a building. Baidax (talk) 22:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Comment In addition to the number of rooms, many sources also provide the number of windows and the number of doors, especially for castles. It would therefore be logical to proceed with the request of these other properties to complete the set. These are a different and will require more specific treatment; they remain distinct from the proposal here. Baidax (talk) 22:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Support useful basic information with no other simple way to model it. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 11:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Support. Thierry Caro (talk) 22:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Question Why not use has part(s) of the class (P2670)=room (Q180516) with qualifier quantity (P1114)=<N>? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: It seem complex, at least for the description. Should it be more a property who use room (Q180516) as a unit? --Fralambert (talk) 01:57, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: I'm the first to prefer using existing proerties and qualifiers rather than creating properties but here it's seems a bit strange. I thought about solutions like volume as quantity (P2234)'X'room (Q180516) (quantity (P1114) is a bit better than volume as quantity (P2234)) but it doesn't seem right, your suggestion seems less akward but still a bit strange and too convoluted. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: It seem complex, at least for the description. Should it be more a property who use room (Q180516) as a unit? --Fralambert (talk) 01:57, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Support Pmt (talk) 21:51, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Oppose I think Mike Peel's solution is fine. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 02:19, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Support Germartin1 (talk) 09:35, 7 October 2020 (UTC)