[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

User talk:Gaurav

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dralansun (talk | contribs) at 09:18, 27 December 2010 (Appeal to you). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Reviewer rights

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 15:58, 15 June 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Oh! Thanks! Unexpected, but a pleasant surprise :D -- Gaurav (talk) 06:46, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip

Hello Gaurav, I appreciate your effort of improvement of (meantime only) technical aspects of template. You wanted to show wikilinks to certain source of cumulative template. Interesting solution is made in the Taxon template that uses subtemplates like {{FishTaxon}}. Then it is possible to show its wikilinks Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:FishTaxon. If this is possible then it would be possible to use (in theory) subtemplate for every single source. Maybe you have already considered this because you are technically more skilled, but at least this is one of theoretical possibilities. Have a nice day. --Snek01 (talk) 11:25, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TaxonIds

A discussion is under way at Template talk:TaxonIds#Identifiers concerning the desired appearance of the identifers shown by {{TaxonIds}}. As a contributor to the last discussion, your input will be greatly appreciated. --Stemonitis (talk) 06:42, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice! -- Gaurav (talk) 18:01, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal to you

Reg: [BRAHMAN PUJAN] , [UNIVERSAL PRAYERS] . written by [Naresh Sonee] On wikipedia , These above two pages are far older than the present article [Brahman] References of above titles are also available on New York site - http://www.printsasia.com/BookDetails.aspx?Id=445813482 Meanwhile, Can your good selves in Wiki Project Indian Community re-create a precise pages on [Naresh Sonee] & his book [Brahmand Pujan] – [Brahmaand Pujan] . However, Sonee is the writer of this book [Brahmand Pujan] written in 1999 . registered with Government of India- HRRD. Details of the registration is provided here on http://brhmaandpujanbook.tripod.com/ . More than sufficient, news and reviews are there on http://brhmaandpujan-news-reviews.tripod.com/ Since 5-6 yrs, for one or the other reason pages of [Naresh Sonee] & [Brahmand Pujan] are faced by communal bias from outside India so these articles over and again get deleted here in Wikipedia for minor reasons. However, many hits of - Naresh Sonee reflects on google search engine also. So, I request Wiki Indian community to kindly come forward and generously help these two pages to grow, as I am fed up to fight my case alone here [left] and moved out long back. Meanwhile, such an important info/issue on ‘Indian literature’ which adds & spell ‘new meaning /dimension’ to Brahman -should it stay lost else ignored? Your community panel has to judge at last. Myself, will not be on Wikipedia, for the same i apologise, but- pls. help these two pages to get reinstalled, reap, sow and grow, if you too feel so, I appeal to do this munificent favour. Regards- Dralansun (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:56, 27 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]


Gaurav, I believe you are a wise brain not to debate with but, if you feel Bollywood , Hollywood models, actors , villains, and dancers are having place in Wikipedia, why shouldn’t a person like Naresh Sonee ? Do you don’t believe that every religion to love each other - to Universalise for humanism ? Pls. read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dralansun - what Naresh Sonee is upto and then decide pls. ?