Talk:XB Machine

This article was nominated for deletion on 31 July 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

New Article

Wikipedia entry created on July 31st, 2008 - Contribute with new insights! --Itemirus (talk) 10:13, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't consider this spam - the article is about a new OS, currently distributed fro free, that claims to be the most secure system around - i guess it is enough to qualify the subject worthy of a wikipedia entry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Itemirus (talk • contribs) 10:17, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These are the same developers of the xb browser, which has a wikipedia entry.--Itemirus (talk) 10:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check this entry XB Browser - it has links for the xerobank corporation as well, so that has to be deleted as well? This is a free os - Admins let me know :-) --Itemirus (talk) 10:38, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it does read as an advert, which is the problem. Write it with a more neutral tone (see WP:NPOV), add plenty of third party references and try to establish why this article is noteworthy enough for inclusion (see WP:NOTABLE). StephenBuxton (talk) 11:54, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK Admin - give me some time and i'll try to rewrite the article accordingly to the WP standards. --Itemirus (talk) 11:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article should be deleted.

I would say merge it with XeroBank Browser, but that article should be deleted too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.29.115.6 (talk) 21:39, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]