| // Copyright 2013 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. |
| // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be |
| // found in the LICENSE file. |
| |
| #include "net/cert/ct_log_verifier.h" |
| |
| #include <stdint.h> |
| |
| #include <memory> |
| #include <string> |
| #include <vector> |
| |
| #include "base/macros.h" |
| #include "base/strings/string_number_conversions.h" |
| #include "base/time/time.h" |
| #include "crypto/secure_hash.h" |
| #include "net/base/hash_value.h" |
| #include "net/cert/ct_log_verifier_util.h" |
| #include "net/cert/merkle_audit_proof.h" |
| #include "net/cert/merkle_consistency_proof.h" |
| #include "net/cert/signed_certificate_timestamp.h" |
| #include "net/cert/signed_tree_head.h" |
| #include "net/test/ct_test_util.h" |
| #include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h" |
| |
| namespace net { |
| |
| namespace { |
| |
| // Calculate the power of two nearest to, but less than, |n|. |
| // |n| must be at least 2. |
| size_t CalculateNearestPowerOfTwo(size_t n) { |
| DCHECK_GT(n, 1u); |
| |
| size_t ret = size_t(1) << (sizeof(size_t) * 8 - 1); |
| while (ret >= n) |
| ret >>= 1; |
| |
| return ret; |
| } |
| |
| // All test data replicated from |
| // https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency/blob/c41b090ecc14ddd6b3531dc7e5ce36b21e253fdd/cpp/merkletree/merkle_tree_test.cc |
| |
| // The SHA-256 hash of an empty Merkle tree. |
| const uint8_t kEmptyTreeHash[32] = { |
| 0xe3, 0xb0, 0xc4, 0x42, 0x98, 0xfc, 0x1c, 0x14, 0x9a, 0xfb, 0xf4, |
| 0xc8, 0x99, 0x6f, 0xb9, 0x24, 0x27, 0xae, 0x41, 0xe4, 0x64, 0x9b, |
| 0x93, 0x4c, 0xa4, 0x95, 0x99, 0x1b, 0x78, 0x52, 0xb8, 0x55}; |
| |
| std::string GetEmptyTreeHash() { |
| return std::string(std::begin(kEmptyTreeHash), std::end(kEmptyTreeHash)); |
| } |
| |
| // SHA-256 Merkle leaf hashes for the sample tree that all of the other test |
| // data relates to (8 leaves). |
| const char* const kLeafHashes[8] = { |
| "6e340b9cffb37a989ca544e6bb780a2c78901d3fb33738768511a30617afa01d", |
| "96a296d224f285c67bee93c30f8a309157f0daa35dc5b87e410b78630a09cfc7", |
| "0298d122906dcfc10892cb53a73992fc5b9f493ea4c9badb27b791b4127a7fe7", |
| "07506a85fd9dd2f120eb694f86011e5bb4662e5c415a62917033d4a9624487e7", |
| "bc1a0643b12e4d2d7c77918f44e0f4f79a838b6cf9ec5b5c283e1f4d88599e6b", |
| "4271a26be0d8a84f0bd54c8c302e7cb3a3b5d1fa6780a40bcce2873477dab658", |
| "b08693ec2e721597130641e8211e7eedccb4c26413963eee6c1e2ed16ffb1a5f", |
| "46f6ffadd3d06a09ff3c5860d2755c8b9819db7df44251788c7d8e3180de8eb1"}; |
| |
| // SHA-256 Merkle root hashes from building the sample tree leaf-by-leaf. |
| // The first entry is the root when the tree contains 1 leaf, and the last is |
| // the root when the tree contains all 8 leaves. |
| const char* const kRootHashes[8] = { |
| "6e340b9cffb37a989ca544e6bb780a2c78901d3fb33738768511a30617afa01d", |
| "fac54203e7cc696cf0dfcb42c92a1d9dbaf70ad9e621f4bd8d98662f00e3c125", |
| "aeb6bcfe274b70a14fb067a5e5578264db0fa9b51af5e0ba159158f329e06e77", |
| "d37ee418976dd95753c1c73862b9398fa2a2cf9b4ff0fdfe8b30cd95209614b7", |
| "4e3bbb1f7b478dcfe71fb631631519a3bca12c9aefca1612bfce4c13a86264d4", |
| "76e67dadbcdf1e10e1b74ddc608abd2f98dfb16fbce75277b5232a127f2087ef", |
| "ddb89be403809e325750d3d263cd78929c2942b7942a34b77e122c9594a74c8c", |
| "5dc9da79a70659a9ad559cb701ded9a2ab9d823aad2f4960cfe370eff4604328"}; |
| |
| // A single consistency proof. Contains at most 3 proof nodes (all test proofs |
| // will be for a tree of size 8). |
| struct ConsistencyProofTestVector { |
| size_t old_tree_size; |
| size_t new_tree_size; |
| size_t proof_length; |
| const char* const proof[3]; |
| }; |
| |
| // A collection of consistency proofs between various sub-trees of the sample |
| // tree. |
| const ConsistencyProofTestVector kConsistencyProofs[] = { |
| // Empty consistency proof between trees of the same size (1). |
| {1, 1, 0, {"", "", ""}}, |
| // Consistency proof between tree of size 1 and tree of size 8, with 3 |
| // nodes in the proof. |
| {1, |
| 8, |
| 3, |
| {"96a296d224f285c67bee93c30f8a309157f0daa35dc5b87e410b78630a09cfc7", |
| "5f083f0a1a33ca076a95279832580db3e0ef4584bdff1f54c8a360f50de3031e", |
| "6b47aaf29ee3c2af9af889bc1fb9254dabd31177f16232dd6aab035ca39bf6e4"}}, |
| // Consistency proof between tree of size 6 and tree of size 8, with 3 |
| // nodes in the proof. |
| {6, |
| 8, |
| 3, |
| {"0ebc5d3437fbe2db158b9f126a1d118e308181031d0a949f8dededebc558ef6a", |
| "ca854ea128ed050b41b35ffc1b87b8eb2bde461e9e3b5596ece6b9d5975a0ae0", |
| "d37ee418976dd95753c1c73862b9398fa2a2cf9b4ff0fdfe8b30cd95209614b7"}}, |
| // Consistency proof between tree of size 2 and tree of size 5, with 2 |
| // nodes in the proof. |
| {2, |
| 5, |
| 2, |
| {"5f083f0a1a33ca076a95279832580db3e0ef4584bdff1f54c8a360f50de3031e", |
| "bc1a0643b12e4d2d7c77918f44e0f4f79a838b6cf9ec5b5c283e1f4d88599e6b", ""}}}; |
| |
| // A single audit proof. Contains at most 3 proof nodes (all test proofs will be |
| // for a tree of size 8). |
| struct AuditProofTestVector { |
| size_t leaf; |
| size_t tree_size; |
| size_t proof_length; |
| const char* const proof[3]; |
| }; |
| |
| // A collection of audit proofs for various leaves and sub-trees of the tree |
| // defined by |kRootHashes|. |
| const AuditProofTestVector kAuditProofs[] = { |
| {0, 1, 0, {"", "", ""}}, |
| {0, |
| 8, |
| 3, |
| {"96a296d224f285c67bee93c30f8a309157f0daa35dc5b87e410b78630a09cfc7", |
| "5f083f0a1a33ca076a95279832580db3e0ef4584bdff1f54c8a360f50de3031e", |
| "6b47aaf29ee3c2af9af889bc1fb9254dabd31177f16232dd6aab035ca39bf6e4"}}, |
| {5, |
| 8, |
| 3, |
| {"bc1a0643b12e4d2d7c77918f44e0f4f79a838b6cf9ec5b5c283e1f4d88599e6b", |
| "ca854ea128ed050b41b35ffc1b87b8eb2bde461e9e3b5596ece6b9d5975a0ae0", |
| "d37ee418976dd95753c1c73862b9398fa2a2cf9b4ff0fdfe8b30cd95209614b7"}}, |
| {2, |
| 3, |
| 1, |
| {"fac54203e7cc696cf0dfcb42c92a1d9dbaf70ad9e621f4bd8d98662f00e3c125", "", |
| ""}}, |
| {1, |
| 5, |
| 3, |
| {"6e340b9cffb37a989ca544e6bb780a2c78901d3fb33738768511a30617afa01d", |
| "5f083f0a1a33ca076a95279832580db3e0ef4584bdff1f54c8a360f50de3031e", |
| "bc1a0643b12e4d2d7c77918f44e0f4f79a838b6cf9ec5b5c283e1f4d88599e6b"}}}; |
| |
| // Decodes a hexadecimal string into the binary data it represents. |
| std::string HexToBytes(const std::string& hex_data) { |
| std::vector<uint8_t> output; |
| std::string result; |
| if (base::HexStringToBytes(hex_data, &output)) |
| result.assign(output.begin(), output.end()); |
| return result; |
| } |
| |
| // Constructs a consistency/audit proof from a test vector. |
| // This is templated so that it can be used with both ConsistencyProofTestVector |
| // and AuditProofTestVector. |
| template <typename TestVectorType> |
| std::vector<std::string> GetProof(const TestVectorType& test_vector) { |
| std::vector<std::string> proof(test_vector.proof_length); |
| std::transform(test_vector.proof, |
| test_vector.proof + test_vector.proof_length, proof.begin(), |
| &HexToBytes); |
| |
| return proof; |
| } |
| |
| // Creates a ct::MerkleConsistencyProof from its arguments and returns the |
| // result of passing this to log.VerifyConsistencyProof(). |
| bool VerifyConsistencyProof(const CTLogVerifier& log, |
| size_t old_tree_size, |
| const std::string& old_tree_root, |
| size_t new_tree_size, |
| const std::string& new_tree_root, |
| const std::vector<std::string>& proof) { |
| return log.VerifyConsistencyProof( |
| ct::MerkleConsistencyProof(log.key_id(), proof, old_tree_size, |
| new_tree_size), |
| old_tree_root, new_tree_root); |
| } |
| |
| // Creates a ct::MerkleAuditProof from its arguments and returns the result of |
| // passing this to log.VerifyAuditProof(). |
| bool VerifyAuditProof(const CTLogVerifier& log, |
| size_t leaf, |
| size_t tree_size, |
| const std::vector<std::string>& proof, |
| const std::string& tree_root, |
| const std::string& leaf_hash) { |
| return log.VerifyAuditProof(ct::MerkleAuditProof(leaf, tree_size, proof), |
| tree_root, leaf_hash); |
| } |
| |
| class CTLogVerifierTest : public ::testing::Test { |
| public: |
| void SetUp() override { |
| log_ = CTLogVerifier::Create(ct::GetTestPublicKey(), "testlog", |
| "https://ct.example.com", "ct.example.com"); |
| |
| ASSERT_TRUE(log_); |
| EXPECT_EQ(ct::GetTestPublicKeyId(), log_->key_id()); |
| EXPECT_EQ("ct.example.com", log_->dns_domain()); |
| } |
| |
| protected: |
| scoped_refptr<const CTLogVerifier> log_; |
| }; |
| |
| // Given an audit proof for a leaf in a Merkle tree, asserts that it verifies |
| // and no other combination of leaves, tree sizes and proof nodes verifies. |
| void CheckVerifyAuditProof(const CTLogVerifier& log, |
| size_t leaf, |
| size_t tree_size, |
| const std::vector<std::string>& proof, |
| const std::string& root_hash, |
| const std::string& leaf_hash) { |
| EXPECT_TRUE( |
| VerifyAuditProof(log, leaf, tree_size, proof, root_hash, leaf_hash)) |
| << "proof for leaf " << leaf << " did not pass verification"; |
| EXPECT_FALSE( |
| VerifyAuditProof(log, leaf - 1, tree_size, proof, root_hash, leaf_hash)) |
| << "proof passed verification with wrong leaf index"; |
| EXPECT_FALSE( |
| VerifyAuditProof(log, leaf + 1, tree_size, proof, root_hash, leaf_hash)) |
| << "proof passed verification with wrong leaf index"; |
| EXPECT_FALSE( |
| VerifyAuditProof(log, leaf ^ 2, tree_size, proof, root_hash, leaf_hash)) |
| << "proof passed verification with wrong leaf index"; |
| EXPECT_FALSE( |
| VerifyAuditProof(log, leaf, tree_size * 2, proof, root_hash, leaf_hash)) |
| << "proof passed verification with wrong tree height"; |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyAuditProof(log, leaf / 2, tree_size / 2, proof, root_hash, |
| leaf_hash)) |
| << "proof passed verification with wrong leaf index and tree height"; |
| EXPECT_FALSE( |
| VerifyAuditProof(log, leaf, tree_size / 2, proof, root_hash, leaf_hash)) |
| << "proof passed verification with wrong tree height"; |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyAuditProof(log, leaf, tree_size, proof, GetEmptyTreeHash(), |
| leaf_hash)) |
| << "proof passed verification with wrong root hash"; |
| |
| std::vector<std::string> wrong_proof; |
| |
| // Modify a single element on the proof. |
| for (size_t j = 0; j < proof.size(); ++j) { |
| wrong_proof = proof; |
| wrong_proof[j] = GetEmptyTreeHash(); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyAuditProof(log, leaf, tree_size, wrong_proof, root_hash, |
| leaf_hash)) |
| << "proof passed verification with one wrong node (node " << j << ")"; |
| } |
| |
| wrong_proof = proof; |
| wrong_proof.push_back(std::string()); |
| EXPECT_FALSE( |
| VerifyAuditProof(log, leaf, tree_size, wrong_proof, root_hash, leaf_hash)) |
| << "proof passed verification with an empty node appended"; |
| |
| wrong_proof.back() = root_hash; |
| EXPECT_FALSE( |
| VerifyAuditProof(log, leaf, tree_size, wrong_proof, root_hash, leaf_hash)) |
| << "proof passed verification with an incorrect node appended"; |
| wrong_proof.pop_back(); |
| |
| if (!wrong_proof.empty()) { |
| wrong_proof.pop_back(); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyAuditProof(log, leaf, tree_size, wrong_proof, root_hash, |
| leaf_hash)) |
| << "proof passed verification with the last node missing"; |
| } |
| |
| wrong_proof.clear(); |
| wrong_proof.push_back(std::string()); |
| wrong_proof.insert(wrong_proof.end(), proof.begin(), proof.end()); |
| EXPECT_FALSE( |
| VerifyAuditProof(log, leaf, tree_size, wrong_proof, root_hash, leaf_hash)) |
| << "proof passed verification with an empty node prepended"; |
| |
| wrong_proof[0] = root_hash; |
| EXPECT_FALSE( |
| VerifyAuditProof(log, leaf, tree_size, wrong_proof, root_hash, leaf_hash)) |
| << "proof passed verification with an incorrect node prepended"; |
| } |
| |
| // Given a consistency proof between two snapshots of the tree, asserts that it |
| // verifies and no other combination of tree sizes and proof nodes verifies. |
| void CheckVerifyConsistencyProof(const CTLogVerifier& log, |
| int old_tree_size, |
| int new_tree_size, |
| const std::string& old_root, |
| const std::string& new_root, |
| const std::vector<std::string>& proof) { |
| // Verify the original consistency proof. |
| EXPECT_TRUE(VerifyConsistencyProof(log, old_tree_size, old_root, |
| new_tree_size, new_root, proof)) |
| << "proof between trees of size " << old_tree_size << " and " |
| << new_tree_size << " did not pass verification"; |
| |
| if (proof.empty()) { |
| // For simplicity test only non-trivial proofs that have old_root != |
| // new_root |
| // old_tree_size != 0 and old_tree_size != new_tree_size. |
| return; |
| } |
| |
| // Wrong tree size: The proof checking code should not accept as a valid proof |
| // a proof for a tree size different than the original size it was produced |
| // for. Test that this is not the case for off-by-one changes. |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(log, old_tree_size - 1, old_root, |
| new_tree_size, new_root, proof)) |
| << "proof passed verification with old tree size - 1"; |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(log, old_tree_size + 1, old_root, |
| new_tree_size, new_root, proof)) |
| << "proof passed verification with old tree size + 1"; |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(log, old_tree_size ^ 2, old_root, |
| new_tree_size, new_root, proof)) |
| << "proof passed verification with old tree size ^ 2"; |
| |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(log, old_tree_size, old_root, |
| new_tree_size * 2, new_root, proof)) |
| << "proof passed verification with new tree height + 1"; |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(log, old_tree_size, old_root, |
| new_tree_size / 2, new_root, proof)) |
| << "proof passed verification with new tree height - 1"; |
| |
| const std::string wrong_root("WrongRoot"); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(log, old_tree_size, old_root, |
| new_tree_size, wrong_root, proof)) |
| << "proof passed verification with wrong old root"; |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(log, old_tree_size, wrong_root, |
| new_tree_size, new_root, proof)) |
| << "proof passed verification with wrong new root"; |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(log, old_tree_size, new_root, |
| new_tree_size, old_root, proof)) |
| << "proof passed verification with old and new root swapped"; |
| |
| // Variations of wrong proofs, all of which should be rejected. |
| std::vector<std::string> wrong_proof; |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(log, old_tree_size, old_root, |
| new_tree_size, new_root, wrong_proof)) |
| << "empty proof passed verification"; |
| |
| // Modify a single element in the proof. |
| for (size_t j = 0; j < proof.size(); ++j) { |
| wrong_proof = proof; |
| wrong_proof[j] = GetEmptyTreeHash(); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(log, old_tree_size, old_root, |
| new_tree_size, new_root, wrong_proof)) |
| << "proof passed verification with incorrect node (node " << j << ")"; |
| } |
| |
| wrong_proof = proof; |
| wrong_proof.push_back(std::string()); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(log, old_tree_size, old_root, |
| new_tree_size, new_root, wrong_proof)) |
| << "proof passed verification with empty node appended"; |
| |
| wrong_proof.back() = proof.back(); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(log, old_tree_size, old_root, |
| new_tree_size, new_root, wrong_proof)) |
| << "proof passed verification with last node duplicated"; |
| wrong_proof.pop_back(); |
| |
| wrong_proof.pop_back(); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(log, old_tree_size, old_root, |
| new_tree_size, new_root, wrong_proof)) |
| << "proof passed verification with last node missing"; |
| |
| wrong_proof.clear(); |
| wrong_proof.push_back(std::string()); |
| wrong_proof.insert(wrong_proof.end(), proof.begin(), proof.end()); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(log, old_tree_size, old_root, |
| new_tree_size, new_root, wrong_proof)) |
| << "proof passed verification with empty node prepended"; |
| |
| wrong_proof[0] = proof[0]; |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(log, old_tree_size, old_root, |
| new_tree_size, new_root, wrong_proof)) |
| << "proof passed verification with first node duplicated"; |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(CTLogVerifierTest, VerifiesCertSCT) { |
| ct::SignedEntryData cert_entry; |
| ct::GetX509CertSignedEntry(&cert_entry); |
| |
| scoped_refptr<ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp> cert_sct; |
| ct::GetX509CertSCT(&cert_sct); |
| |
| EXPECT_TRUE(log_->Verify(cert_entry, *cert_sct.get())); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(CTLogVerifierTest, VerifiesPrecertSCT) { |
| ct::SignedEntryData precert_entry; |
| ct::GetPrecertSignedEntry(&precert_entry); |
| |
| scoped_refptr<ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp> precert_sct; |
| ct::GetPrecertSCT(&precert_sct); |
| |
| EXPECT_TRUE(log_->Verify(precert_entry, *precert_sct.get())); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(CTLogVerifierTest, FailsInvalidTimestamp) { |
| ct::SignedEntryData cert_entry; |
| ct::GetX509CertSignedEntry(&cert_entry); |
| |
| scoped_refptr<ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp> cert_sct; |
| ct::GetX509CertSCT(&cert_sct); |
| |
| // Mangle the timestamp, so that it should fail signature validation. |
| cert_sct->timestamp = base::Time::Now(); |
| |
| EXPECT_FALSE(log_->Verify(cert_entry, *cert_sct.get())); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(CTLogVerifierTest, FailsInvalidLogID) { |
| ct::SignedEntryData cert_entry; |
| ct::GetX509CertSignedEntry(&cert_entry); |
| |
| scoped_refptr<ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp> cert_sct; |
| ct::GetX509CertSCT(&cert_sct); |
| |
| // Mangle the log ID, which should cause it to match a different log before |
| // attempting signature validation. |
| cert_sct->log_id.assign(cert_sct->log_id.size(), '\0'); |
| |
| EXPECT_FALSE(log_->Verify(cert_entry, *cert_sct.get())); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(CTLogVerifierTest, VerifiesValidSTH) { |
| ct::SignedTreeHead sth; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ct::GetSampleSignedTreeHead(&sth)); |
| EXPECT_TRUE(log_->VerifySignedTreeHead(sth)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(CTLogVerifierTest, DoesNotVerifyInvalidSTH) { |
| ct::SignedTreeHead sth; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ct::GetSampleSignedTreeHead(&sth)); |
| sth.sha256_root_hash[0] = '\x0'; |
| EXPECT_FALSE(log_->VerifySignedTreeHead(sth)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(CTLogVerifierTest, VerifiesValidEmptySTH) { |
| ct::SignedTreeHead sth; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ct::GetSampleEmptySignedTreeHead(&sth)); |
| EXPECT_TRUE(log_->VerifySignedTreeHead(sth)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(CTLogVerifierTest, DoesNotVerifyInvalidEmptySTH) { |
| ct::SignedTreeHead sth; |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ct::GetBadEmptySignedTreeHead(&sth)); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(log_->VerifySignedTreeHead(sth)); |
| } |
| |
| // Test that excess data after the public key is rejected. |
| TEST_F(CTLogVerifierTest, ExcessDataInPublicKey) { |
| std::string key = ct::GetTestPublicKey(); |
| key += "extra"; |
| |
| scoped_refptr<const CTLogVerifier> log = CTLogVerifier::Create( |
| key, "testlog", "https://ct.example.com", "ct.example.com"); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(log); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(CTLogVerifierTest, VerifiesConsistencyProofEdgeCases_EmptyProof) { |
| std::vector<std::string> empty_proof; |
| std::string old_root(GetEmptyTreeHash()), new_root(GetEmptyTreeHash()); |
| |
| // Tree snapshots that are always consistent, because the proofs are either |
| // from an empty tree to a non-empty one or for trees of the same size. |
| EXPECT_TRUE( |
| VerifyConsistencyProof(*log_, 0, old_root, 0, new_root, empty_proof)); |
| EXPECT_TRUE( |
| VerifyConsistencyProof(*log_, 0, old_root, 1, new_root, empty_proof)); |
| EXPECT_TRUE( |
| VerifyConsistencyProof(*log_, 1, old_root, 1, new_root, empty_proof)); |
| |
| // Invalid consistency proofs. |
| // Time travel to the past. |
| EXPECT_FALSE( |
| VerifyConsistencyProof(*log_, 1, old_root, 0, new_root, empty_proof)); |
| EXPECT_FALSE( |
| VerifyConsistencyProof(*log_, 2, old_root, 1, new_root, empty_proof)); |
| // Proof between two trees of different size can never be empty. |
| EXPECT_FALSE( |
| VerifyConsistencyProof(*log_, 1, old_root, 2, new_root, empty_proof)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(CTLogVerifierTest, VerifiesConsistencyProofEdgeCases_MismatchingRoots) { |
| const std::string old_root(GetEmptyTreeHash()); |
| std::string new_root; |
| std::vector<std::string> empty_proof; |
| |
| // Roots don't match. |
| EXPECT_FALSE( |
| VerifyConsistencyProof(*log_, 0, old_root, 0, new_root, empty_proof)); |
| EXPECT_FALSE( |
| VerifyConsistencyProof(*log_, 1, old_root, 1, new_root, empty_proof)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(CTLogVerifierTest, |
| VerifiesConsistencyProofEdgeCases_MatchingRootsNonEmptyProof) { |
| const std::string empty_tree_hash(GetEmptyTreeHash()); |
| |
| std::vector<std::string> proof; |
| proof.push_back(empty_tree_hash); |
| |
| // Roots match and the tree size is either the same or the old tree size is 0, |
| // but the proof is not empty (the verification code should not accept |
| // proofs with redundant nodes in this case). |
| proof.push_back(empty_tree_hash); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(*log_, 0, empty_tree_hash, 0, |
| empty_tree_hash, proof)); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(*log_, 0, empty_tree_hash, 1, |
| empty_tree_hash, proof)); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyConsistencyProof(*log_, 1, empty_tree_hash, 1, |
| empty_tree_hash, proof)); |
| } |
| |
| class CTLogVerifierConsistencyProofTest |
| : public CTLogVerifierTest, |
| public ::testing::WithParamInterface<size_t /* proof index */> {}; |
| |
| // Checks that a sample set of valid consistency proofs verify successfully. |
| TEST_P(CTLogVerifierConsistencyProofTest, VerifiesValidConsistencyProof) { |
| const ConsistencyProofTestVector& test_vector = |
| kConsistencyProofs[GetParam()]; |
| const std::vector<std::string> proof = GetProof(test_vector); |
| |
| const char* const old_root = kRootHashes[test_vector.old_tree_size - 1]; |
| const char* const new_root = kRootHashes[test_vector.new_tree_size - 1]; |
| CheckVerifyConsistencyProof(*log_, test_vector.old_tree_size, |
| test_vector.new_tree_size, HexToBytes(old_root), |
| HexToBytes(new_root), proof); |
| } |
| |
| INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(KnownGoodProofs, |
| CTLogVerifierConsistencyProofTest, |
| ::testing::Range(size_t(0), |
| arraysize(kConsistencyProofs))); |
| |
| class CTLogVerifierAuditProofTest |
| : public CTLogVerifierTest, |
| public ::testing::WithParamInterface<size_t /* proof index */> {}; |
| |
| // Checks that a sample set of valid audit proofs verify successfully. |
| TEST_P(CTLogVerifierAuditProofTest, VerifiesValidAuditProofs) { |
| const AuditProofTestVector& test_vector = kAuditProofs[GetParam()]; |
| const std::vector<std::string> proof = GetProof(test_vector); |
| |
| const char* const root_hash = kRootHashes[test_vector.tree_size - 1]; |
| CheckVerifyAuditProof(*log_, test_vector.leaf, test_vector.tree_size, proof, |
| HexToBytes(root_hash), |
| HexToBytes(kLeafHashes[test_vector.leaf])); |
| } |
| |
| INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(KnownGoodProofs, |
| CTLogVerifierAuditProofTest, |
| ::testing::Range(size_t(0), arraysize(kAuditProofs))); |
| |
| TEST_F(CTLogVerifierTest, VerifiesAuditProofEdgeCases_InvalidLeafIndex) { |
| std::vector<std::string> proof; |
| EXPECT_FALSE( |
| VerifyAuditProof(*log_, 1, 0, proof, std::string(), std::string())); |
| EXPECT_FALSE( |
| VerifyAuditProof(*log_, 2, 1, proof, std::string(), std::string())); |
| |
| const std::string empty_hash = GetEmptyTreeHash(); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyAuditProof(*log_, 1, 0, proof, empty_hash, std::string())); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyAuditProof(*log_, 2, 1, proof, empty_hash, std::string())); |
| } |
| |
| // Functions that implement algorithms from RFC6962 necessary for constructing |
| // Merkle trees and proofs. This allows tests to generate a variety of trees |
| // for exhaustive testing. |
| namespace rfc6962 { |
| |
| // Calculates the hash of a leaf in a Merkle tree, given its content. |
| // See RFC6962, section 2.1. |
| std::string HashLeaf(const std::string& leaf) { |
| const char kLeafPrefix[] = {'\x00'}; |
| |
| SHA256HashValue sha256; |
| memset(sha256.data, 0, sizeof(sha256.data)); |
| |
| std::unique_ptr<crypto::SecureHash> hash( |
| crypto::SecureHash::Create(crypto::SecureHash::SHA256)); |
| hash->Update(kLeafPrefix, 1); |
| hash->Update(leaf.data(), leaf.size()); |
| hash->Finish(sha256.data, sizeof(sha256.data)); |
| |
| return std::string(reinterpret_cast<const char*>(sha256.data), |
| sizeof(sha256.data)); |
| } |
| |
| // Calculates the root hash of a Merkle tree, given its leaf data and size. |
| // See RFC6962, section 2.1. |
| std::string HashTree(std::string leaves[], size_t tree_size) { |
| if (tree_size == 0) |
| return GetEmptyTreeHash(); |
| if (tree_size == 1) |
| return HashLeaf(leaves[0]); |
| |
| // Find the index of the last leaf in the left sub-tree. |
| const size_t split = CalculateNearestPowerOfTwo(tree_size); |
| |
| // Hash the left and right sub-trees, then hash the results. |
| return ct::internal::HashNodes(HashTree(leaves, split), |
| HashTree(&leaves[split], tree_size - split)); |
| } |
| |
| // Returns a Merkle audit proof for the leaf with index |leaf_index|. |
| // The tree consists of |leaves[0]| to |leaves[tree_size-1]|. |
| // If |leaf_index| is >= |tree_size|, an empty proof will be returned. |
| // See RFC6962, section 2.1.1, for more details. |
| std::vector<std::string> CreateAuditProof(std::string leaves[], |
| size_t tree_size, |
| size_t leaf_index) { |
| std::vector<std::string> proof; |
| if (leaf_index >= tree_size) |
| return proof; |
| if (tree_size == 1) |
| return proof; |
| |
| // Find the index of the first leaf in the right sub-tree. |
| const size_t split = CalculateNearestPowerOfTwo(tree_size); |
| |
| // Recurse down the correct branch of the tree (left or right) to reach the |
| // leaf with |leaf_index|. Add the hash of the branch not taken at each step |
| // on the way up to build the proof. |
| if (leaf_index < split) { |
| proof = CreateAuditProof(leaves, split, leaf_index); |
| proof.push_back(HashTree(&leaves[split], tree_size - split)); |
| } else { |
| proof = |
| CreateAuditProof(&leaves[split], tree_size - split, leaf_index - split); |
| proof.push_back(HashTree(leaves, split)); |
| } |
| |
| return proof; |
| } |
| |
| // Returns a Merkle consistency proof between two Merkle trees. |
| // The old tree contains |leaves[0]| to |leaves[old_tree_size-1]|. |
| // The new tree contains |leaves[0]| to |leaves[new_tree_size-1]|. |
| // Call with |contains_old_tree| = true. |
| // See RFC6962, section 2.1.2, for more details. |
| std::vector<std::string> CreateConsistencyProof(std::string leaves[], |
| size_t new_tree_size, |
| size_t old_tree_size, |
| bool contains_old_tree = true) { |
| std::vector<std::string> proof; |
| if (old_tree_size == 0 || old_tree_size > new_tree_size) |
| return proof; |
| if (old_tree_size == new_tree_size) { |
| // Consistency proof for two equal subtrees is empty. |
| if (!contains_old_tree) { |
| // Record the hash of this subtree unless it's the root for which |
| // the proof was originally requested. (This happens when the old tree is |
| // balanced). |
| proof.push_back(HashTree(leaves, old_tree_size)); |
| } |
| return proof; |
| } |
| |
| // Find the index of the last leaf in the left sub-tree. |
| const size_t split = CalculateNearestPowerOfTwo(new_tree_size); |
| |
| if (old_tree_size <= split) { |
| // Root of the old tree is in the left subtree of the new tree. |
| // Prove that the left subtrees are consistent. |
| proof = |
| CreateConsistencyProof(leaves, split, old_tree_size, contains_old_tree); |
| // Record the hash of the right subtree (only present in the new tree). |
| proof.push_back(HashTree(&leaves[split], new_tree_size - split)); |
| } else { |
| // The old tree root is at the same level as the new tree root. |
| // Prove that the right subtrees are consistent. The right subtree |
| // doesn't contain the root of the old tree, so set contains_old_tree = |
| // false. |
| proof = CreateConsistencyProof(&leaves[split], new_tree_size - split, |
| old_tree_size - split, |
| /* contains_old_tree = */ false); |
| // Record the hash of the left subtree (equal in both trees). |
| proof.push_back(HashTree(leaves, split)); |
| } |
| return proof; |
| } |
| |
| } // namespace rfc6962 |
| |
| class CTLogVerifierTestUsingGenerator |
| : public CTLogVerifierTest, |
| public ::testing::WithParamInterface<size_t /* tree_size */> {}; |
| |
| // Checks that valid consistency proofs for a range of generated Merkle trees |
| // verify successfully. |
| TEST_P(CTLogVerifierTestUsingGenerator, VerifiesValidConsistencyProof) { |
| const size_t tree_size = GetParam(); |
| |
| std::vector<std::string> tree_leaves(tree_size); |
| for (size_t i = 0; i < tree_size; ++i) |
| tree_leaves[i].push_back(static_cast<char>(i)); |
| |
| const std::string tree_root = |
| rfc6962::HashTree(tree_leaves.data(), tree_size); |
| |
| // Check consistency proofs for every sub-tree. |
| for (size_t old_tree_size = 0; old_tree_size <= tree_size; ++old_tree_size) { |
| SCOPED_TRACE(old_tree_size); |
| const std::string old_tree_root = |
| rfc6962::HashTree(tree_leaves.data(), old_tree_size); |
| const std::vector<std::string> proof = rfc6962::CreateConsistencyProof( |
| tree_leaves.data(), tree_size, old_tree_size); |
| // Checks that the consistency proof verifies only with the correct tree |
| // sizes and root hashes. |
| CheckVerifyConsistencyProof(*log_, old_tree_size, tree_size, old_tree_root, |
| tree_root, proof); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Checks that valid audit proofs for a range of generated Merkle trees verify |
| // successfully. |
| TEST_P(CTLogVerifierTestUsingGenerator, VerifiesValidAuditProofs) { |
| const size_t tree_size = GetParam(); |
| |
| std::vector<std::string> tree_leaves(tree_size); |
| for (size_t i = 0; i < tree_size; ++i) |
| tree_leaves[i].push_back(static_cast<char>(i)); |
| |
| const std::string root = rfc6962::HashTree(tree_leaves.data(), tree_size); |
| |
| // Check audit proofs for every leaf in the tree. |
| for (size_t leaf = 0; leaf < tree_size; ++leaf) { |
| SCOPED_TRACE(leaf); |
| std::vector<std::string> proof = |
| rfc6962::CreateAuditProof(tree_leaves.data(), tree_size, leaf); |
| // Checks that the audit proof verifies only for this leaf data, index, |
| // hash, tree size and root hash. |
| CheckVerifyAuditProof(*log_, leaf, tree_size, proof, root, |
| rfc6962::HashLeaf(tree_leaves[leaf])); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Test verification of consistency proofs and audit proofs for all tree sizes |
| // from 0 to 128. |
| INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(RangeOfTreeSizes, |
| CTLogVerifierTestUsingGenerator, |
| testing::Range(size_t(0), size_t(129))); |
| |
| } // namespace |
| |
| } // namespace net |