Info created/uploaded/nominated by Calibas (talk) 04:51, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Calibas (talk) 04:51, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question do you know, when you took the image?--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 19:45, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support looks good.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 09:38, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support A nice bird picture. Needs to see the picture high resolution. Fantatastic for all birdwatchers!Zimbres (talk) 19:05, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- The cropping of this picture doesn't make sense to me. I'd like to see more of the bird in the frame and a more customary aspect ratio (both of which would improve the image's value). I'm afraid if the image were cropped to focus more on the bird, however, the resolution would be too low and the bird would not appear sharp enough. Kaldari (talk) 23:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Oppose The bird hasn't much detail on it. I don't like lighting and composition as well (rather subjective justifications, sorry). Benh (talk) 20:31, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Quality just isn't there, a bit surprised by this nomination as you've had some pretty good pics before. --Dori - Talk 03:38, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose as Dori. Lycaon (talk) 17:37, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer (talk) 00:55, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done Oops, forgot to add that. --Calibas (talk) 21:04, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
