Jeff3000

Coat of arms

Agreed - copyvio & deleted, thanks & regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again, deleted & user indef blocked (though given the language issues I have asked others to review my action) cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted again Jeff thanks. Short on time for now so the user & IP (not the same as the user's IP - some good in having CU:)) is not blocked at present (I'll have more time tomorrow I hope). If you have thoughts do let me know & I'll sort it Monday I hope (worth protecting against recreation?). In passing I am not as active as I was so - while very happy to help - do check whether I am currently active if you want anything (admin boards being another good place to post). Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:28, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Deleted & blocked this time - cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:45, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Dupe image

Certainly what you say seems correct. Equally it is tagged as a dupe so will get sorted soon I guess - cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

OK - got the message but I see it has turned red so someone got to it while I was off line - cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:23, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Seyed Ali Mohammed Bab.jpg

hi your source say this image belongs to mohammad ali bab please do not revert it.--Mardetanha 14:20, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

but online resources as you given as the source shows he is bab and i have seen in some other book same .please either find another online reliabe source or don't change the image--Mardetanha 14:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Re Help

OK - this one needs the views of more than one person. However I see you have also posted to the admin board which is wise. Responding to this will not be a quick job but I certainly will take a look. The en:Bab link is actually a disambig page so you may want to look at that. Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:03, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Nicolas?

about trustworthy of Nicolas:

"No European scholar has contributed so much to our knowledge of the life and teachings of the Bab as Nicolas. His study of the life of the Bab and his translations... remain of unsurpassed value." --Dr. Moojan Momen, The Babi and Baha'i Religions, 1844-1944., p. 36

(Ref) regards --Rohan 11:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

evidence

Please return with reliabe evidence (and dont reference to wrong sources), and dont rvt without discusion. regards --Rohan 20:52, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

About disputes

I generally don't interfere with the activities of Commoners until they violate our basic standards (like licensing) or turn into nasty personal flamewars (in which case I'll start handing out blocks like a Lego factory). Otherwise, I'm quite happy to let you two argue it out. Just keep it mellow. Remember that you're not his enemy. You're two normal, decent human beings who disagree about something.

As it happens, even if these documents are mis-titled, I don't see the big deal. If you must, identify which scholars hold what view in the image description. This is definitely not something worth fighting over.

(Short reply, sorry, Sunday evening and I want to kick back a bit. Though I'll probably be back later.) Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Travel dates must be wrong - arrival time is set to before departure time

Hi Jeff3000,

I am new to this technology, so please bear with me if I am in the wrong place. I am trying to contact you regarding an image you uploaded for the article on Baha'u'llah. It is the image with the route taken by Baha'u'llah, in which some dates do not add up. The arrrival date in Acre is set to before the departure date from Constantinople.(not Constantinope :-) ) It must be impossible to arrive before you depart. But then again, it was Baha'u'llah that was doing the travelling. I have a fixed image ready for you, if you want to use it. I just Photoshopped the dates and swapped them. Piece of cake that was. You can download the fixed file from http://www.dearodear.com/images/fixed.png Hope you don't mind me writing this. I hope you actually get to read this. Theodorus_Albers

Thanks for the note. The dates were wrong, but not in the way you indicated. I've fixed the dates to correspond with the initial source that can be found here. Thanks again. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 21:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

2 images of copyright violation

I've seen 1 of my uploaded images being deleted, and another one already deleted. "File:Bab's house.jpg" and "File:Bahai study circle.jpg". Both of these pics are from http://media.bahai.org/ ,as I noted. At the front page of the site,it says:

“

Welcome to the Bahá’í Media Bank, a free interactive online service operated and owned by the Bahá’í International Community. Here you will find photos of the Bahá’í community, historical figures, events and activities, houses of worship, and holy places. Simply create an account and log in to download up to 20 images at a time. You can browse the entire site without logging in. Click on Help for more details on how to use the site. All of the images are available for download without charge and are intended for non-commercial purposes only. Terms of Use will tell you more.

”

So I'm quite sure that I didn't violate copyright, can the pics be restored? Thx. 茶烟 (talk) 15:25, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Bahai-apia.jpg

File:Bahai-apia.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Mhhossein ^talk 14:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)