Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arun Padiyoor.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arun Padiyoor.jpg

Unused personal images outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:58, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It is technically and esthetically an excellent photo, with great illustrative power, regardless of the fact that the model is a non-notable person (if indeed). -- Tuválkin ✉ 15:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, glad to see that you have put in a lot of appropriate categories to the image. I have nominated many images with this rationale recently. So is good quality an excuse to keep such images? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:32, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

“Excuse”? I call it a reason, not an excuse. But then I see Commons as a repository of useful media, not as a gallery for photographers’ vanity… -- Tuválkin ✉ 19:19, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, no concensus to delete this image. Krd 08:23, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arun Padiyoor.jpg

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:48, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep, per previous decision. User:Moheen Reeyad should not waste the community’s valuable time with frivolous DRs. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:02, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: It's categorized in some deept feeld cat so I think this is acually a good example for it. --Sanandros (talk) 23:05, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arun Padiyoor.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep, per previous decisions. As said before about a previous nominator, User:EugeneZelenko should not waste the community’s valuable time with frivolous DRs. Do I dare to say about an admin what I said about a regular user? Yeah, I do. You see, admins should be accountable to a higher standard, not the opposite. Trying to make a point, EugeneZelenko? Pinging @Krd and @Sanandros, previous keep-closers. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Since in some past DRs nominators and/or other concerned deletionists tried to sway the vote by removing categories (although the lack thereof should never be cause for deletion), I did archive this filepage as of just now here and here. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It is a high quality photograph even if this is the only contribution of a user. Could find some future educational use in the right context Abzeronow (talk) 18:35, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a new argument so I speed up the kept decision.--Sanandros (talk) 20:04, 20 October 2018 (UTC). --Sanandros (talk) 20:04, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.