Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gilad Shalit on Hamas poster.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gilad Shalit on Hamas poster.jpg

[edit]

Derivative work. --Liftarn (talk) 09:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No FOP for 2D according to COM:FOP#Israel (assuming Israeli copyright law is valid in the West Bank). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:15, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Again familiar all faces! What an irony to suggest that hamas poster is protected under Israel copyright low.--Mbz1 (talk) 12:29, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The photo of Gilad might be protected. Then, the poster itself and also a reproduction of it is a derivative.--Túrelio (talk) 13:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Mbz1 --Herby talk thyme 13:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Questions: Do Hollywood movie posters enjoy copyright protection under Israeli law? Does Israel support the theory of equality under the law? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Pieter, I am afraid my English is not good enough to understand what is the connection between Hollywood movie posters ,Israeli law, hamas poster, Palestinian National Authority under which jurisdiction Nablus (where the image was taken) is.I am afraid I also do not understand what did you mean under "Does Israel support the theory of equality under the law?" If I were not afraid that you'll report me to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems, I would have said that yes, Israel supports the theory of equality under the law, For example Palestinian women, who are the citizens of Israel, have much more civil rights than women in Arab countries, but because I am afraid that you will report me on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems, may I please ask you to assume that I said nothing of the kind. (I retract my words right now :) ). Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:28, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A 2D poster is not what is meant by en:Applied art. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Posters like these unfortunately seem to be of function and everyday use over there ;-). --Dschwen (talk) 22:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
comment - It would be a real shame to lose this one. WP needs more propaganda art. Suggest Mbz1 phones up Hamas and asks them nicely to release it under CC... Sean.hoyland (talk) 18:44, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A good one, Sean.hoyland :) BTW I believe this deletion request should be closed. After all it has been discussed since January. Thank you. --Mbz1 (talk) 18:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I found a better-than-nothing master of law thesis A HISTORICAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES. Unfortunately I blacked out and banged my head on the desk shortly after starting reading it. Others may be able to get further through the document. Sean.hoyland (talk) 19:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, derivative work. Kameraad Pjotr 20:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gilad Shalit on Hamas poster.jpg

[edit]

I think it isn't possible to consider the poster as de minimis. Ralgistalk 02:49, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment No, not de minimis, and not under freedom of panorama either, from what I understand of the undeletion discussion. Some people in the previous deletion discussion seem to have made a different argument, similar to that for graffiti - that the author's actions are unlawful and so they would find it difficult to enforce any copyright they might hold over the image. --Avenue (talk) 11:22, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I don't understand why this image is a candidate for deletion. I believe everything stated above is as it stands. Keep. Dinkytown (talk) 11:46, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Under Israeli law, per the interpretation of what appears to be Israel's top copyright lawyer, FOP covers both 2D and 3D artistic works in a public place as long as they are meant to provide information, and these posters comply. There does not seem to be an extant text of Palestinian copyright law which we can peruse for a ruling, and none of us are legal authorities in either area to make a precedent ruling as to what version of UK law may or may not apply. Further, whether Israeli law or Palestinian law (which in this case does not seem to exist( applies in these areas is a matter of both hideous political debate and confusion. As such, the clearest indications are that this image, and those like it, are acceptable, and should be kept until proven to be in violation of a specific statute. -- Avi (talk) 18:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gilad Shalit on Hamas poster.jpg

[edit]

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep See above. Also, this doesn't look like it's intended to be temporary. Such posters are attached once and left there until they're destroyed. Nobody would assume they're removed after e.g. 2 weeks, like on billboards. PaterMcFly (talk) 07:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per comment and previous kept decision. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:02, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Gilad_Shalit_on_Hamas_poster.jpg&oldid=853019788"