Commons:Deletion requests/File:Doppelmotor E 19 1.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file may meet the criteria for speedy deletion. This file is a copyright violation because it is copyrighted and not published under a free license. The file is subject to speedy deletion unless it is relicensed according to the Commons licensing policy. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: It is not known when it was published. Licence is invalid. No evidence that the author died 70 years ago. Photo scanned from book published in 1991. Please refer to Commons:Publication. There is no evidence that it was published 70 years ago. There are many indications that this is a photograph taken by a private person. Please refer to Commons:Project scope/Evidence. The uploader failed to prove that the photo was published over 70 years ago. All content in the book is copyrighted by the publisher. Respecting copyright is not about making claims without evidence. It never means that someone can scan a photo from a book and a recipe that they introduce shortly after creating it. The photo comes from a private collection with a high probability. There are no signs that this is a promotional photo. Many such photos were kept in private archival collections. Copyright should not be implied. This should be based on unequivocal evidence. No one can ever immediately assume that a photo was published immediately after it was taken. This can never be an arbitrary decision by one editor. This file is a copyright violation because it comes from - Wolfgang Messerschmidt, Lokomotivtechnik im Bild, Motorbuch, Stuttgart, 1991, ISBN 9783613013841 Uoijm77 (talk) 12:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I can't be bothered to answer of 100 part superfluous applications, and so its better to answer in german:
Wann ist die Baureihe E 19 entstanden? In den 1930er Jahren. Und ein Werkfoto stammt aus der Zeit und nur als Werkfoto ist diese Aufnahme entstanden, auch wenn es nicht extra angeführt ist. Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete There is no evidence that the photo was published more than 70 years ago. There is also no evidence that this is a factory photo. The locomotives were operated until 1978. It is possible that the picture was taken during a later repair. Uoijm77 (talk) 09:34, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep dann hätte der Veröffentlicher wohl ein Bildadressat und Datum aufgeschrieben. So steht nichts und er hat ein gemeinfreies Foto verwendet.Rainerhaufe (talk) 10:17, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete An incomprehensible argument. Conjuring reality is pointless. The only documented case of the publication of this photo is the aforementioned book. Picture is not public domain. Uoijm77 (talk) 11:26, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wir sollen nicht mehrfach  Keep bzw.  Delete hintereinander verwenden. Die Aufnahme ist auf jedem Fall um die 1930er Jahre entstanden. Der Fotograf ist nicht bekannt. Also hat man es auch um die Zeit veröffentlicht. Außerdem handelt es sich lediglich um einen Scan vom Buch. Die Urheber heute haben mit dem Scan vom Negativ wesentlich mehr Möglichkeiten. Also sollte man vielleicht nicht so viel Geschrei um nichts machen? Rainerhaufe (talk) 12:17, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The photo is a copyright infringement. All explanations are provided at the beginning of the discussion. This picture is not in the public domain. Uoijm77 (talk) 10:43, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep ein Foto was vor 1945 im Rahmen einer Werkfotografie entstanden ist, als das Fotografieren von Eisenbahnanlagen privat verboten war, von einem unbekannten Fotografen, ist keine Urheberrechtsverletzung. Es ist daher gemeinfrei. Rainerhaufe (talk) 08:42, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Evidence missing that this photograph was published early enough. Given publication date is 1991. --Wdwd (talk) 12:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]