Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Finland Air force squadrons without squadron emblem.svg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Fantasy. This flag does not exists. --Kwasura (talk) 11:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- User:Kwasura: Please notify the uploader when nominating files for deletion! I have now notified all uploaders of this file. No comment on the desired outcome of the deletion request. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: ton of sock uploads. probably funny to bring false info to people. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Restored per undeletion request. Alan (talk) 09:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Non existing incorrect flag. All correct and existing flags are already uploaded. Kwasura (talk) 13:53, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- SPEEDY
Keep -- This deletion request is semi-stupid (since the image is exactly described by its name), and adds nothing whatsoever to the previous rejected deletion requests above, and under the file's former name at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Finland Air force.svg. AnonMoos (talk) 15:14, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- I am having a discussion here with the people who do not give a damn, but are politically active, and vote as true republicans. Difficult task... very difficult... --Kwasura (talk) 21:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have no idea what you're talking about, but it doesn't matter, because your claimed reasons for deletion don't make too much sense. This is the base flag, or flag template, or whatever you want to call it, for the different squadrons, or brigades, or whatever you want to call them, of the Finnish Air Force. No one has ever claimed it was anything else. I renamed the flag in the case the previous name might have been unintentionally misleading. Therefore there is no reason to delete this image. AnonMoos (talk)`
- Just compare your upload with any existing flag. Just do it. I don't even know why we still having this conversation. File should be deleted a long time ago. Perhaps, it is AnonMoos personal project to keep it here. The reasons remain unknown though. You want a template? So download any of the existing correct files and use it. --Kwasura (talk) 12:50, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- If you do this, then you'll see it's the flag of Finland Air force squadrons without a squadron emblem in the corner (what a coincidence). AnonMoos (talk) 04:27, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- Now it is just gibberish... --Kwasura (talk) 00:31, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 13:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
 |
Incorrect image of non existing flag. Kwasura (talk) 02:46, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete - not here to confuse people. --E4024 (talk) 02:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- I request a SPEEDY AND DEFINITIVE FINAL KEEP -- User:Kwasura has some kind of unhealthy obsession with this flag image, and has banging away at it for years, but none of his deletion requests (when made in the proper form with the proper notifications) has been upheld. User:Kwasura should only get so many "bites of the apple" (as they say in the U.S. legal system) -- if he can't come up with any new reasonable arguments, then his bringing up of this file for repeated deletion nominations serves no useful purpose... AnonMoos (talk) 19:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
@Perhelion: the request is technically still pending. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: speedy close, 4. renominating without new reason, User:Kwasura is warned not to do this again or this is vandalism. -- User: Perhelion 21:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)