Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shaved penis banana.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
no more penis 21wine (talk) 02:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, Wikicommons has plenty of penis photos. Thuresson (talk) 01:30, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- Keep No special reason to delete this one and not other pictures of penis of the same quality. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- Keep high quality photo.--Prosfilaes (talk) 15:15, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
image of no value, worthless self-adulation 89.247.199.71 00:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
It's in use. Kept. --Prosfilaes (talk) 01:18, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Obvious amator. Abondant pictures of the same penis. Best alternatives. Commons isn't a porn blog : COM:NUDE. ~ FAP (talk) 14:08, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - good quality photo from a set of good quality photos. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:13, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Another pictures of the same author delated here. Florent Pécassou (talk) 14:21, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I'd also like those undeleted please. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - I should point out this image is in use, and therefore, no matter what, it IS within scope because it is not our job to second guess other projects' decisions. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep It's in use at w:zh-yue:朘; it's unquestionably in scope.--Prosfilaes (talk) 17:22, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Scope + in use. No reason to delete. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:09, 28 May 2011 (UTC)