Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stevewozniak.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
- File:Steve Wozniak at home.jpg
- File:Steve Wozniak at home 2.jpg
- File:Steve Wozniak.png
- File:Steve Wozniak oval.png
I see no permission at http://www.woz.org/photos/4/17 Pieter Kuiper (talk) 00:06, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- I do not either. But there used to be such a notice. I am discussing this with OTRS currently. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ？ 00:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- There doesn't seem to be any time limit on that page, so I'd assume that the permission is valid as long as the Internet Archive is listed as source. Similarly, you can't repeal a CC licence by changing licence tagging on Flickr; the old licence still continues to apply. --Stefan4 (talk) 01:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- True but it does not say "commercially available" nor does it say "allows derivatives" so I feel OTRS verification is perhaps necessary. Mind you the uploads were in 2005-2006 when it was simpler times. The site in question has no (C) markings in its current form so I am under the impression this site (http://www.woz.org) could be a goldmine for us for Apple-related images. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ？ 01:30, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- The text also mentions "reports and news articles" which could be seen as a limitation on the use. --Stefan4 (talk) 01:49, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- True but it does not say "commercially available" nor does it say "allows derivatives" so I feel OTRS verification is perhaps necessary. Mind you the uploads were in 2005-2006 when it was simpler times. The site in question has no (C) markings in its current form so I am under the impression this site (http://www.woz.org) could be a goldmine for us for Apple-related images. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ？ 01:30, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- There doesn't seem to be any time limit on that page, so I'd assume that the permission is valid as long as the Internet Archive is listed as source. Similarly, you can't repeal a CC licence by changing licence tagging on Flickr; the old licence still continues to apply. --Stefan4 (talk) 01:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ahh, I should have looked at the current woz site first, where there is a direct link to Alan's site [3] ! :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 06:27, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep As far as I am concerned, the message from the wayback is equivalent to Template:Attribution. Shall I write up a ticket or should we just add a link to this discussion to the file description pages? Sven Manguard Wha? 01:39, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: In view of the uncertainty here, I think I have to delete these. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
