Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Punisher
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Punisher
[edit]Non-trivial logo and Commons:Derivative works from it.
- File:Czaszka punisher.png
- File:Deuce Four Skull.jpg
- File:The Punisher E3 2004.jpg
- File:The Punisher.svg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep for File:Deuce Four Skull.jpg because the country of origin is Iraq so the Punisher Skull is not copyrighted in Iraq and in the US it would be also ok per FOP.--Sanandros (talk) 20:55, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Why is the skull not copyrighted in Iraq if Iraq is the source country? Iraq only protects works whose source country is Iraq, I think. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Because the skull was first published in the US so Iraq doesn't respect that copyright.--Sanandros (talk) 06:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- If it was first published in the United States, then the source country is the United States, not Iraq. Also, since the source country is the United States, it is copyrighted in the United States and all Berne Convention countries. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yea the skull it self may be copyrighted but sprayed on a wall makes it FOP in the US.--Sanandros (talk) 21:18, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- In the United States, you can take photos which are part of a building, but I'm not sure that spraying an image on a building makes the image a part of a building. If someone puts an advertisement on a building, a photograph of the advertisement would normally be deleted on Commons. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:36, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yea the skull it self may be copyrighted but sprayed on a wall makes it FOP in the US.--Sanandros (talk) 21:18, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- If it was first published in the United States, then the source country is the United States, not Iraq. Also, since the source country is the United States, it is copyrighted in the United States and all Berne Convention countries. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Because the skull was first published in the US so Iraq doesn't respect that copyright.--Sanandros (talk) 06:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Why is the skull not copyrighted in Iraq if Iraq is the source country? Iraq only protects works whose source country is Iraq, I think. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)