Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St. Trudpert Münstertal 04.jpg

File:St. Trudpert Münstertal 04.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2024 at 17:34:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:St. Trudpert Münstertal 04.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St. Trudpert Münstertal 04.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
•  Info I found this picture really satisfying both in terms of the composition - symmetrical, but with just enough asymmetry to make it interesting - and the beautiful rich colours. Created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Nice, but the left and right crops feel close (I understand the problem Llez faced, but I'd still theoretically like some space on either side, and maybe on top, too), and the 2nd floor's sharpness might be OK but is hardly overwhelming. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:28, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support IMO, there is enough space on either side. Otherwise excellent quality. --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

• I think Ikan means that the blue windows are right at the edge of the frame, which is fair enough, but ultimately you have got to make the crop somewhere. Personally I think it is well framed as it is but we will see how the votes go. Cmao20 (talk) 21:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

• Correct. That's how I react to this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Info You can see a JPG-copy of the original raw file here. The photo was taken with 10mm wide angle. It was not possible to go further back to get the lines more vertical. After perspective orrection there were not many alternatives in cropping in my opinion. I request anyone who has a better suggestion for cropping to upload it using the link mentioned. --Llez (talk) 07:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

• It may not have been possible to shoot what I would have considered an FP of this facade, then. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:49, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support ★ 22:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks for the nomination --Llez (talk) 07:05, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan Kekek. -- Karelj (talk) 14:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:18, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Also per Ikan, I miss something here that makes the shot special. It is nice and interesting but there is a gap to extraordinary. Poco a poco (talk) 22:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Pleasant view but not breathtaking, sorry, awkward crop because the window shutters are cut out -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination This picture is unlikely to get three more supports. It's a shame because to me it was a really obvious candidate and I honestly expected it to become FP in a landslide five-day pass. Cmao20 (talk) 00:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 00:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC)