User:A.Savin/Archive/2022/2
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (talk) 07:48, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Graves of Honour of Persecutees of the Nazi Regime (German Democratic Republic)
Hi, I notice that you renamed the category "Groves of Honour of Persecutees of the Nazi Regime (German Democratic Republic)" to "Graves of Honour of Persecutees of the Nazi Regime (German Democratic Republic)", believing that this was a typo. Actually it wasn't. I was trying to create a category for the type of cemetery called "Ehrenhain" by the authorities of the German Democratic Republic, where every single grave was a grave of honour ("Ehrengrab"). At the same time, not every grave with Ehrengrab status is also located in an Ehrenhain. Any suggestions how this issue with naming the category may resolved? Best wishes, ViennaUK (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry for the confusion, I understand the issue but I don't know the exact translation. But then shouldn't it be in singular form "Grove of Honour"? Or simply create the category with its German name. Regards --A.Savin 18:12, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- As I have understood it, this category was intended not only for a single "Ehrenhain", but for "Ehrenhain" as a type of locality.
- In WM Commons, types of localities, as well as types of buildings, are generally marked by plurals.
- Example: German Wikipedia has a de:Kategorie:Gotische Kirche: (grammatical singular) for all articles on single Gothic churches. In WM Commons, the category containing the images of each such Gothic church is housed under the mother category:Gothic churches.--Ulamm (talk) 07:01, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, indeed I intended to create a category for "Ehrenhain as a type of locality", as an example of a specific funerary culture promoted by the German Democratic Republic (GDR). Of course, iot would be possible to use the German term - Ehrenhain für Verfolgte des Naziregimes - but would this be understood internationally? Particularly as, under GDR usage, Verfolgte des Naziregimes referred to a specific group of people who had been granted that status by the GDR authorities and was not simply synonymous with "anyone who had suffered persecution by the Nazi Regime". Regards, ViennaUK (talk) 16:48, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
К удалению
Пожалуйста, удалите нижеперечисленные файлы: File:Buxoro amiring saroyi.ogg File:Shaytanat.ogg File:Kichkina-tabib.ogg File:Abu Rayhon Beruniy.ogg Автором этих подкастов является другой пользователь, я по невнимательности загрузила их от себя . Qamar0904 (talk) 18:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC).
Beelitz
Nach den Regeln der Free Art License ist es ausdrücklich erlaubt dein Foto nicht nur als Kopie zu verwenden, sondern auch Bearbeitungen zu erstellen:
Beste Grüße, --Ulamm (talk) 06:47, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sagen Sie Ihre E-Mail Adresse (oder per Wikimail), ich schicke die raw-Datei oder das unbearbeitete JPG. MfG --A.Savin 09:56, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ich bin zwar nicht "User:Savin", freue mich aber dennoch, dass wir eine Lösung gefunden haben. MfG --A.Savin 16:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Перенаправление
Здравствуйте. Подскажите, зачем нужно удалять перенаправление Category:Karaimskaya Street (Eupatoria)? Mitte27 (talk) 03:35, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Если честно, не могу понять смысл таких сложных перенаправлений. Перенаправления оставляют для облегчения поиска категории, но в данном (и похожих) случае если кто-то ищет Караимскую улицу, просто вводит Karaimskaya в поисковую маску и там обычно высвечивается верное название категории. --A.Savin 07:49, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- При поиске категории Category:Karaimskaya Street (Eupatoria) (до удаления) необходимая категория Category:Karaimskaya Street (Yevpatoria) нам бы сразу подставилась. Кроме того, ссылки на перенаправления могут существовать на сторонних ресурсах, да и насколько я понимаю, запрета на такого типа перенаправления нет. --Mitte27 (talk) 02:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Нет, запрета, безусловно, нет, хотя такие ссылки на сторонних ресурсах по-моему крайне маловероятны. Я к тому, что я ваш труд уважаю, и безусловно не стану чинить вам препятствия, если вы считаете нужным таки вернуть эти редиректы. --A.Savin 02:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
A.Savin, добрый день. Вдогонку прошлой темы. Просьба удалить Category:Ivan Golubets для переименования, поскольку бессрочно заблокированный участник в Англ, Ру, Укр Википедиях развил тут деятельность по переименованию. --Mitte27 (talk) 12:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Ещё раз здравствуйте. Очередная серия неконсенсусного переименования. Прошу удалить категории для переименования: Category:Culture of Stakhanov, Category:History of Stakhanov, Category:People of Stakhanov, Category:UNICEF in Stakhanov, Category:Coats of arms of Stakhanov, Category:Fire engines of Stakhanov. В АнглВики статья называется en:Stakhanov, Ukraine. --Mitte27 (talk) 11:53, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Добрый день. Опять та же ситуация тут: Category:Armiansk Hromada, Category:Alushta Hromada, Category:Feodosia Hromada, Category:Krasnoperekopsk Hromada. Прошу удалить редикты для переименования по АнглВики (en:Alushta Municipality, en:Armiansk Municipality, en:Feodosia Municipality). --Mitte27 (talk) 09:39, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Спасибо. Ещё вот это Category:Dzhankoy City Council (en:Category:Municipalities of Crimea). --Mitte27 (talk) 14:31, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Добрый день. Прошу прощения, что опять пишу по поводу перенаправлений. В Category:Provinces of Kazakhstan прошу удалить для переименования категории с окончанием на Province как в АнглВики (en:Category:Regions of Kazakhstan). Саму категорию «Provinces of Kazakhstan» также. --Mitte27 (talk) 07:38, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Большое спасибо за помощь. Ещё остались категории типа Category:Photographs of flags of Kazakhstan in Aktobe Region и остальные из Category:Photographs of flags of Kazakhstan by region. Прошу также удалить перенаправления. --Mitte27 (talk) 10:54, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ещё нужно удалить Category:Streets in Astana для переименования. И попутно вопрос: что делать с Category:Astana и её подкатегориями? Сейчас там всё названо верно, но сами категории не были переименованы, а просто заменены. Оставить так? --Mitte27 (talk) 09:42, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте Mitte27. Скорее всего, в данном случае это не критично, так как объём контента незначителен и документация "авторства" не требуется. Но неплохо бы попросить сделавшего это участника, чтобы впредь он всё-таки использовал кнопку переименования. --A.Savin 17:16, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ещё нужно удалить Category:Streets in Astana для переименования. И попутно вопрос: что делать с Category:Astana и её подкатегориями? Сейчас там всё названо верно, но сами категории не были переименованы, а просто заменены. Оставить так? --Mitte27 (talk) 09:42, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Большое спасибо за помощь. Ещё остались категории типа Category:Photographs of flags of Kazakhstan in Aktobe Region и остальные из Category:Photographs of flags of Kazakhstan by region. Прошу также удалить перенаправления. --Mitte27 (talk) 10:54, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Удалите, пожалуйста Category:Bilohirsk для переименования по АнглВики (en:Bilohirsk). --Mitte27 (talk) 10:48, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ещё это Category:Coats of arms of Bilohirsk (для переименования). --Mitte27 (talk) 19:11, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- И это тоже. Category:Aivazovsky National Art Gallery. --Mitte27 (talk) 20:16, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Спасибо. Ещё эти Category:Architecture of Crimea, Category:Anatoly Shariy. --Mitte27 (talk) 15:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- И это тоже. Category:Aivazovsky National Art Gallery. --Mitte27 (talk) 20:16, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ещё это Category:Coats of arms of Bilohirsk (для переименования). --Mitte27 (talk) 19:11, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте. Прошу удалить: Category:Photographs of flags of Belarus in Gomel Region, Category:Photographs of flags of Belarus in Vitebsk Region, Category:Gomel, Category:Grodno, Category:Asipovichy, Category:Kalinkavichy, Category:Rechytsa, Category:Luninets, Category:Polotsk, Category:History of Polotsk, Category:Lyakhavichy, Category:Zhlobin. --Mitte27 (talk) 01:05, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
[1] Category:Northern Ireland :) Александр Мотин (talk) 12:22, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Правьте смело, создайте редирект. --A.Savin 12:29, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Livioandronico
Non so se fà più tenerezza che pensiate sempre a me o no......ma veramente credi che metterei le mie foto su quality image o FP? Andrei nella bocca del serpente? ahhahahahah siete incredibili. Mi spiace solo per i poveri cristi che bloccate solo perche hanno foto in italia perche siete razzisti,comunque tranquillo questi mezzucci non mi fermano. Cambio nick e ip in 2 secondi. Credeteci pure. Saluti ahahhahah LivioandronicoNew (talk) 14:54, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- Und mit dieser Rassisten-Unterstellung bist du nunmehr einen entscheidenden Schritt Richtung Globaler Ban (mit der Konsequenz, dass auch deine "genialen" Fotos künftig gleich mit in die Tonne wandern) gerückt, herzlichen Glückwunsch. Mir soll's recht sein. --A.Savin 16:31, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Quellen von abgeleiteten Werken (Bearbeitung) sind anzugeben: File:Aktion 'Aus Abfall wird Kunst' - Karlsruhe - 2022 - 01.jpg
I added the relevant source. Can the deletion request be withdrawn? Greetings --Llez (talk) 13:56, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Tartu asv2022-04 img22 University main building.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tartu asv2022-04 img22 University main building.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Tallinn asv2022-04 img24 Kadriorg Park.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tallinn asv2022-04 img24 Kadriorg Park.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Testing
This is a test. Can you see it without error? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:49, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately no --A.Savin 11:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hmm. Incognito or logged out? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:09, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- With this account all seems fine. --ASavinTestAccount (talk) 12:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: ...however I still wish this were fine with my main account, too (whatever you might do about it). --A.Savin 18:11, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- It could be your scripts, CSS, sysop bit, or some combination. Try safe mode. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:02, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: ...however I still wish this were fine with my main account, too (whatever you might do about it). --A.Savin 18:11, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- With this account all seems fine. --ASavinTestAccount (talk) 12:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hmm. Incognito or logged out? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:09, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Hallo, kannst du mal bitte die Quelle überprüfen? Für mich sieht das nach URV aus, aber ich scheitere an dem kyrillischen Captcha auf der Webseite. De728631 (talk) 14:37, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Marburg asv2022-02 img18 Castle.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Marburg asv2022-02 img18 Castle.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Set Promoted to FP
The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Kadriorg Palace, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Kadriorg Palace has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another set, please do so ! |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:FrankfurtOder asv2022-07 img37 Oderbrücke railway point.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:FrankfurtOder asv2022-07 img37 Oderbrücke railway point.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Tartu asv2022-04 img26 Vanemuine small building.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tartu asv2022-04 img26 Vanemuine small building.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Братеево
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- [2] Так что не устраивает? Александр Мотин (talk) 14:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- Вы пытаетесь удалить единственную категорию, обеспечивающую привязку к местоположению бывшей деревни, а при добавлении "Things naed after" создаёте петлю в категоризационной иерархии. --A.Savin 16:43, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- С этого момента можно поподробнее? Где я создал петлю? Дифф, пожалуйста.--Александр Мотин (talk) 08:11, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Второй вопрос: вот это что такое вообще [3]? Что значит комментарий "it's not named after"?--Александр Мотин (talk) 08:16, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Неверно думать, что район Братеево назван в честь (named after) Братеева. Район Братеево не входит в число вещей, именованных в честь чего-нибудь ещё. -- PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:40, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- @PereslavlFoto: В честь какого объекта назван район Братеево, по вашему мнению? Вот в истории района написано, что название района пошло от села Братеево [4]. Могли бы предоставить АИ, что район Братеево сам по себе так называется, а не по какому-то объекту? P.S. Чуть не забыл. Обратите внимание, что категория Category:Places named after buildings является подкатегорией Category:Things named after buildings. Это на случай если вся ваша претензия заключается в трактовке смысла слова thing. Буду ожидать вашего ответа.--Александр Мотин (talk) 13:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Район Братеево не назван в честь. Вот МГУ назван в честь Ломоносова, или вот закон Бойля—Мариотта назван в честь Бойля и Мариотта. А район Братеево просто назван так, не в честь кого-нибудь или чего-нибудь ещё. Что касается села и района, то у них одно одинаковое название, подобно тому, как у станции метро Китай-Город и у района Китай-Город одинаковое название. Вся моя претензия заключается в трактовке слова named after. -- PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:30, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- @PereslavlFoto: Коллега, словосочетание "named after" переводится не только как "назван в честь", но и, например, как "назван по". Теперь будете в курсе. Вот несколько примеров из англовики [5] ("The district is named after the village of Alexeyevo"), [6] ("The district is named after the Liangzi Lake"), [7] ("The district is named after the town of Jalaun"). Удовлетворяет ли вас разъяснение? --Александр Мотин (talk) 17:42, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Я не хочу бороться с вашим формализмом, однако спешу предупредить, что вы вооружились против публики. Это нехорошо. Ваш спор зряшный. -- PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:47, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Коллега, вместо рассуждений о настроениях некоей публики, которая меня интересует в гораздо меньшей степени нежели дальнейшее развитие проекта и мой конструктивный вклад в него, давайте зафиксируем, что с моей стороны ошибок в категоризации обсуждаемых категорий не было. За сим предлагаю закончить с вами дальнейшее обсуждение этого простого во всех отношениях вопроса. --Александр Мотин (talk) 17:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Я не хочу бороться с вашим формализмом, однако спешу предупредить, что вы вооружились против публики. Это нехорошо. Ваш спор зряшный. -- PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:47, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- @PereslavlFoto: Коллега, словосочетание "named after" переводится не только как "назван в честь", но и, например, как "назван по". Теперь будете в курсе. Вот несколько примеров из англовики [5] ("The district is named after the village of Alexeyevo"), [6] ("The district is named after the Liangzi Lake"), [7] ("The district is named after the town of Jalaun"). Удовлетворяет ли вас разъяснение? --Александр Мотин (talk) 17:42, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Район Братеево не назван в честь. Вот МГУ назван в честь Ломоносова, или вот закон Бойля—Мариотта назван в честь Бойля и Мариотта. А район Братеево просто назван так, не в честь кого-нибудь или чего-нибудь ещё. Что касается села и района, то у них одно одинаковое название, подобно тому, как у станции метро Китай-Город и у района Китай-Город одинаковое название. Вся моя претензия заключается в трактовке слова named after. -- PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:30, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- @PereslavlFoto: В честь какого объекта назван район Братеево, по вашему мнению? Вот в истории района написано, что название района пошло от села Братеево [4]. Могли бы предоставить АИ, что район Братеево сам по себе так называется, а не по какому-то объекту? P.S. Чуть не забыл. Обратите внимание, что категория Category:Places named after buildings является подкатегорией Category:Things named after buildings. Это на случай если вся ваша претензия заключается в трактовке смысла слова thing. Буду ожидать вашего ответа.--Александр Мотин (talk) 13:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Если вы такой непогрешимый и не терпите иного мнения по категоризации, то какой смысл мне устраивать для вас ликбез по оформлению категорий и объяснять, почему петля -- это плохо? Вот интересно однако... --A.Savin 12:18, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Где это я сделал петлю, ещё раз спрашиваю? Диффы плиз. Если я увижу, что именно я сделал петлю, а не ты, то это сразу снимет вопросы. Или с диффами какая-то проблема?--Александр Мотин (talk) 13:23, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Вы опять хамите. Лёд тонок, как никогда. Лучше изучите повнимательнее ветку категории и попробуйте сами разобраться. --A.Savin 16:41, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- @A.Savin: С чего это вдруг "лёд тонок"? Не стоит даже пытаться запугивать пустыми и необоснованными угрозами. Бесполезное занятие. Ну и давайте разбираться. Вот структура категорий, которая была изначально создана мной:
- Вы опять хамите. Лёд тонок, как никогда. Лучше изучите повнимательнее ветку категории и попробуйте сами разобраться. --A.Savin 16:41, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Ну, где петля?--Александр Мотин (talk) 17:27, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- На мой взгляд, здесь такой порядок.
- — Former villages in Russia -> Brateyevo
- — 1960 disestablishments in Russia -> Brateyevo
- — Brateyevo -> Brateyevo District
- — Brateyevo -> Things named after Brateyevo
- — Municipal divisions of Moscow -> Brateyevo District
- — Southern Administrative Okrug -> Brateyevo District
- Все прочие шаги выглядят для меня нелогично, потому что я воспринимаю Братеево как участок территории. PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:50, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Обсуждение темы на форуме. Просьба здесь больше не писать. --A.Savin 18:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Südpark (Spandau)
Hallo Alex Könntest du dir mal diese Kategorie ansehen: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:S%C3%BCdpark_(Berlin-Spandau)? Eine Umbenennung wäre hier denke ich nötig, da die Parkanlage ja in Wilhelmstadt liegt und nicht in Spandau (bei Berlin-Spandau geht es ja um den Ortsteil, nicht um den Bezirk). Schöne Wochenende :)! Lukas Beck (talk) 16:25, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- Natürlich,
Done. LG. --A.Savin 16:38, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
User:F.H.Barth
Zur Kenntnisnahme: 1) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Michael.F.H.Barth 2) https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Berlin_S-Bahn_Bhf_Poelchaustra%C3%9Fe_(S07_0546).jpg&action=history Gruß! Lukas Beck (talk) 18:18, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Papierkorb
Zur Kenntnisnahme! Wäre schön, wenn du mal einen Blick drauf werfen könntest :). Wird sicherlich noch erweitert werden. Gruß! Lukas Beck (talk) 12:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Lukas, schaust du kurz mal wegen dem Foto der Tramhaltestelle? Es wird noch für Wikidata verwendet. LG --A.Savin 17:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Vandalismus?
Zur Kenntnisnahme: Wikipedia:Vandalismusmeldung – Wikipedia Gruß! Lukas Beck (talk) 12:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Tartu asv2022-04 img17 Barclay de Tolly House.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tartu asv2022-04 img17 Barclay de Tolly House.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
User:BerlinMitteFoto
Zur Kenntnisnahme! Vielleicht schaust du dir bei Gelegenheit seine hochgeladenen Bilder und erstellten Kategorien an. Kannst dir ja erstmal eine eigene Meinung bilden. Gruß und schönen Urlaub! Lukas Beck (talk) 06:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Corbusierhaus B-Westend 06-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Interesting point
Can't make much sense of your note on my userpage for your second reversal. Can you explain why the Angela Merkel exemple in the guideline you mention doesn't apply? Enhancing999 (talk) 10:51, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, please mind COM:OVERCAT. I don't understand what this guideline has to do with Frau Merkel. Regards --A.Savin 17:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's a sample in the guideline you are referring to? Would you mind re-reading it? Enhancing999 (talk) 18:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Well, I don't see a case for such an exception here. If File:Station Charleroi-Zuid Naam.jpg is in the Category:Charleroi-Sud train station and the Category:Charleroi-Sud train station is in the Category:Train stations named south station, I don't see any point in adding the File:Station Charleroi-Zuid Naam.jpg straight to the Category:Train stations named south station, too: a classical OVERCAT case. Regards --A.Savin 19:55, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- As mentioned in the edit summary, we currently lack a subcategory at Category:Train stations named south station for signs illustrating such a name. A random image from the subcategories wont help you illustrate "south station". The sub-categories just help you find such stations. Classical Angela Merkel problem, I think. If you have a search I can use that would have found it instead, I'd happy to reconsider. We could create a subcategory or just add the images there. Enhancing999 (talk) 20:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, but regarding such a sign it's too specific and I don't see the necessity for an extra category, or an over-categorization. Regards --A.Savin 23:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- As mentioned in the edit summary, we currently lack a subcategory at Category:Train stations named south station for signs illustrating such a name. A random image from the subcategories wont help you illustrate "south station". The sub-categories just help you find such stations. Classical Angela Merkel problem, I think. If you have a search I can use that would have found it instead, I'd happy to reconsider. We could create a subcategory or just add the images there. Enhancing999 (talk) 20:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Well, I don't see a case for such an exception here. If File:Station Charleroi-Zuid Naam.jpg is in the Category:Charleroi-Sud train station and the Category:Charleroi-Sud train station is in the Category:Train stations named south station, I don't see any point in adding the File:Station Charleroi-Zuid Naam.jpg straight to the Category:Train stations named south station, too: a classical OVERCAT case. Regards --A.Savin 19:55, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's a sample in the guideline you are referring to? Would you mind re-reading it? Enhancing999 (talk) 18:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Tallinn asv2022-04 img56 Kadriorg Palace.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tallinn asv2022-04 img56 Kadriorg Palace.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
A1Cafel (talk) 08:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
salman rushdie❤️
the photo that have you put on your page is heartwarming. as a antireligionist, thank you. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 14:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, Modern primat. He is a great writer and thinker, but from what I know he is NOT to be misinterpreted as an antireligionist. Regards --A.Savin 14:52, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Salman_Rushdie#religion_in_info_box ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 19:38, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Images of Turkey
Hi Savin!
I would like to ask your help. One user is constantly replacing the images with a very high contrast on Turkish related pages especially istanbul. An example
Do you know how can we avoid someone changing from single images. even though the article is protected the images are not hence we keep seeing this user touching to the images and the change is not necessary infact. reducing the quality of the image.
I would like to use your expertise on images here.
Thank you for your time. Metuboy (talk) 09:13, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi there. I have reverted the version, and issued them a warning on COM:OVERWRITE policy. Regards --A.Savin 13:37, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you
Hi!
Thank you for changing the decline back. I just wanted to ask, if you know of a fast way to change the author string for my old files. It is definitely something I want to do, independently of such situations. But doing this manually would take too much effort. In any case, have a nice day! FlocciNivis (talk) 14:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi FlocciNivis. Yes there is a way. Go to your preferences -> Gadgets. In the "Maintenance tools" section, activate "VisualFileChange". Now go to your contribs, and click on "Perform batch task" at the left. As "action", select "Custom replace". You can mark all files, for "pattern to match" enter the old username, for "Text to insert instead" enter the new username. And click on "Execute". Please check your edits afterwards. Regards --A.Savin 14:50, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you a lot! I'll take care of this soon. FlocciNivis (talk) 15:23, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Benutzer mit mehr Erfahrung ;-)
Zur Kenntnisnahme: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Wandmosaik_mit_Tiermotiven_(U-Bahnhof_Tierpark)#Files_in_Category%3AWandmosaik_mit_Tiermotiven_%28U-Bahnhof_Tierpark%29 Vielleicht schaust du es dir ja mal an und kannst Jcornelius seinen Wunsch nach mehr Erfahrung erfüllen. Natürlich will ich nur deine ehrliche Meinung. Danke im Voraus! Lukas Beck (talk) 05:58, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Berlin Neue Nationalgalerie asv2021-11 img1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Berlin Neue Nationalgalerie has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Berlin Neue Nationalgalerie asv2021-11 img2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Berlin Neue Nationalgalerie has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Hallo Alexander, ich mache das mal von Hand, der Bot scheint gerade irgendein Problem zu haben … Glückwünsch zu diesen Aufnahmen, sie sind wirklich super! --Aristeas (talk) 08:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
An apology
Hello, I am sorry that I got carried away with the geography of the Greek railway stations, although it could do with a review given that there are far less railway stations than in France and the UK. As for why I did that, I was trying to emulate the category structure of the railway stations in other cities like London, but now I realised that it turned out to be weak due to the metro system not being as extensive as London. --Minoa (talk) 13:53, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
In Ordnung?
Hallo Alex! Würdest du dir das hier einmal ansehen? https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Waldbrand_2022_hrensko.jpg&action=history Was sagst du zur Dateiumbenennung und das für die Umbenennung kein Grund angegeben wurde. Viele Grüße Lukas Beck (talk) 14:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Das scheint der Autor selbst gewünscht zu haben, da würde ich kein Aufhebens drum machen. LG --A.Savin 20:25, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
User:C.Suthorn
Hallo Alex Könntest du dir bei Gelegenheit die neusten Uploads des Nutzers ansehen? Seine aufnahmen der "Zugkollision" sind hier und da etwas bedenklich. Zunächst halte ich die Betitelung für kritisch, da auf den meisten Bildern von einer Zugkollision nichts zu sehen ist. Entsprechend bedenklich ist auch die Kategorisierung. Des Weiteren ist mir aufgefallen, das er etwas in diesem Bild (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zugkollision_in_Leiferde_Dalldorf_im_November_2022_01.jpg) {{Personality rights}} verwendet. Das ist doch in diesem Fall völlig überflüssig. Liebe Grüße Lukas Beck (talk) 14:53, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Seitdem ich das Verhalten von C.Suthorn mir (und wohl nicht nur mir) gegenüber als überaus aggressiv und unkooperativ wahrnehmen musste, habe ich keine Lust, mit dieser Person groß über irgendwas zu diskutieren. Meine bescheidene Meinung: Wenn in einem Bild {{Personality rights}} steht, ohne dass dort irgendjemands Persönlichkeitsrechte überhaupt betroffen sind, darf/soll man die Vorlage ruhig entfernen. Wenn ein Bild "Zugkollision" heißt, ohne dass es auch nur annähernd ein solches Ereignis zeigt, darf/soll man das Bild ruhig umbenennen. Und wenn es sich nicht um Einzelfälle handelt, sondern sowas massenhaften Charakter annimmt, sollte man zusätzlich darüber nachdenken, den Benutzer ernsthaft zu verwarnen und bei Uneinsichtigkeit auch entsprechend zu sanktionieren. LG --A.Savin 20:35, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Also gab es schon einmal einen öffentlichen Diskurs über den Nutzer? Hat sich seitdem etwas geändert? Lukas Beck (talk) 07:22, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, also ich habe mir Abschnitte seiner Arbeiten angesehen und hier und da mal meine Meinung dazu geäußert. Seine Reaktionen sind unglaublich. Kannst es dir ja gerne Mal ansehen, aber wahrscheinlich wird es dich nicht überraschen. Lukas Beck (talk) 10:06, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Also gab es schon einmal einen öffentlichen Diskurs über den Nutzer? Hat sich seitdem etwas geändert? Lukas Beck (talk) 07:22, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Istanbul asv2020-02 img26 Topkapı Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
What a surprise...
... You are not only an Administrator! | ||
I had a feeling you were just a (very good) Commons administrator, but, in voting for photo of the year 2021, I was delighted to see your many great photos. Then, this surreal barnstar is for your dedication and expertise! --Terragio67 (talk) 09:08, 27 November 2022 (UTC) |
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Narva asv2022-04 img09 Castle.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Narva asv2022-04 img09 Castle.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Nuuk Buildings (25454100533).jpg
Hallo Alex. Würdest du kurz einmal hier vorbeischauen? Hier wurde das urheberrechtlich geschützte Werk verdeckt in der Dateiversion ist das Original noch sichtbar. Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 18:19, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Berlin Johannes-Basilika asv2022-06 img2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin Johannes-Basilika asv2022-06 img2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Hallo Alex. Ich wollte dich Mal auf diese Kategorie aufmerksam machen. Das geht doch so nicht?! Was sagst du dazu? Lukas Beck (talk) 12:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Bildverwendung Dietrichshagen
Guten Morgen Alex. Dein Bild wird im Artikel https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diedrichshagen_(Rostock) verwendet und soweit ich das sehe fälschlicherweise als Strand der Stoltera bezeichnet. Ist das richtig? Würdest du dir das noch einmal kurz anschauen? Danke und frohen dritten Advent! Lukas Beck (talk) 09:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:FrankfurtOder asv2022-07 img01 Holy Cross Church.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:FrankfurtOder asv2022-07 img01 Holy Cross Church.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
User:Ank kumar
Hallo Alex. Würdest du hier kurz bei der Versionsgeschichte vorbeischauen. Sollte man den Nutzer darauf mal anschreiben? Weil so sieht mein Verständnis der Motive definitiv nicht aus. Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 13:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- Das ist mir bei weiteren 2 Bildern aufgefallen. Scheint also kein Einzelfall zu sein. Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 13:05, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Schau dir mal dieses Bild an. Ich habe es mal in die Tin Eye geworfen und habe Resultate von 2008 gefunden. das Bild wurde in sehr schlechter Auflösung erst 2011 hochgeladen und laut dem Autor auch erst 2011 erstellt. Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 18:40, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Kassel asv2022-02 img22 Fridericianum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kassel asv2022-02 img22 Fridericianum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ET Afar asv2018-01 img87 Abala surroundings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Mural on a building along Chemin du Struykbeken in Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Belgium (DSC 1877).jpg
This file is claimed Own work. Was the mural done by the uploader? This seems like a glaring problem that should have been picked up in the QI review.
And since details matter in QI, I also wonder about the supposed urination (see the file’s categories). I assume this refers to the person standing under the train, facing the wall. How do we know that they are in fact urinating? Does this add to or detract from this photo? Pinging @Trougnouf as uploader. Brianjd (talk) 10:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- The picture is my "own work", the mural is the main subject but there is clearly more being depicted there, like the building which is also not designed by the photographer, and there is freedom of panorama in Belgium. The man urinating is my interpretation as a passerby/photographer so I described it as such. It is part of the photograph, whether it adds, detracts, or anything else is subjective and irrelevant. --Trougnouf (talk) 11:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Trougnouf I have added {{FoP-Belgium}}. I still think there’s a problem with {{Own}}, given the way uploaders are treated at DRs. Brianjd (talk) 11:46, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- I've removed the urination categories. Regarding "own work", this refers to the photo and as long as there is FoP, it's fine IMO. Regards --A.Savin 12:18, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- I think that's inappropriate. I put in some effort to categorize the image well and I believe the man is pretty clearly urinating. --Trougnouf (talk) 13:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- This is certainly de minimis on the picture and it's not even clear what the guy exactly is doing. I also put effort into categories, but I don't, for example, add category "Yellow vehicles" to this picture. That's not what categories are for. Regards --A.Savin 13:45, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- I wouldn't either, but I also wouldn't remove it if someone went through the effort to add that category. It can be useful and educational. Are you saying "That's not what categories are for" because there is a rule somewhere or you are applying your arbitrary opinion? --Trougnouf (talk) 13:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- It's my opinion, I don't think it's arbitrary. --A.Savin 18:16, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- I would put it in the "yellow vehicles" SDC-depicts. [and I cannot understand the effort all put into categories, when the WMF made it clear that SDC and not categories are the new way to do things] Also: The image survived the great "no Facebook" purge! [or has the decicion to remove no Facebook templates from all files been reversed without my knowledgt?] C.Suthorn (talk) 14:45, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- I place "Please don't upload it on Facebook" remark. --A.Savin 18:16, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- I wouldn't either, but I also wouldn't remove it if someone went through the effort to add that category. It can be useful and educational. Are you saying "That's not what categories are for" because there is a rule somewhere or you are applying your arbitrary opinion? --Trougnouf (talk) 13:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- This is certainly de minimis on the picture and it's not even clear what the guy exactly is doing. I also put effort into categories, but I don't, for example, add category "Yellow vehicles" to this picture. That's not what categories are for. Regards --A.Savin 13:45, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- I think that's inappropriate. I put in some effort to categorize the image well and I believe the man is pretty clearly urinating. --Trougnouf (talk) 13:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
С наступающими праздниками, Александр!
* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Alexander! * | ||
-- George Chernilevsky talk 02:58, 23 December 2022 (UTC) |
- Thank you, George / Спасибо вам, Георгий. Желаю и далее не падать духом, и чтобы в новом году все ужасы и уродства нынешнего времени наконец ушли в прошлое, ну и как всегда здоровья и творческих успехов на много лет вперёд. --A.Savin 03:17, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Magdeburg asv2022-08 img28 Fürstenwallpark monument.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Magdeburg asv2022-08 img28 Fürstenwallpark monument.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy holidays
Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, A.Savin!
The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Wikimedia friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:49, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks Ryan, and Happy holidays to you too. Best regards --A.Savin 00:29, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy Holidays 2022/2023!
template
hello sir, can you add this to that? i cannot do it myself. thank you. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 20:28, 27 December 2022 (UTC) (code is breaking here, i moved my signature up)
-->Türkçe ∙
- Done. --A.Savin 21:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- thank you so much for that! so, here's a gift! ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 22:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion request
Hi @A.Savin I wanted to ask your help as I'm not very knowledgeable about licenses/Wiki-Commons and you seem to be more knowledgeable. On: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leeraner_Miniaturland are many images that I believe violate the law in Germany and should not be on Commons. Maybe you can help me. Best regards Bildersindtoll (talk) 00:21, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- I've marked them as DW-no permission. --A.Savin 01:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, unfortunately I've only now noticed that the pictures on https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modellbahn_Wiehe seem to be a very similar case. Maybe you can follow up on that too? Thanks again for your effort. Bildersindtoll (talk) 11:34, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
FP nomination
Hello, not long ago I nominated a diagram I had created for Featured Picture consideration (COM:Featured picture candidates/File:Triton-en.svg). One of the reviewers made a claim that the image was "original research" (not an FP criterion, but whatever) and then later acknowledged that he'd made a mistake but still held his "oppose" position. Other reviewers went with the flow, and you eventually closed the discussion as "not promoted". I am wondering if the image can be given a second chance-- it's a very high quality diagram, easily as high a caliber as many other similar Commons images of planets and moons which have also been featured pictures. Please let me know if this is even possible. Thanks! A loose necktie (talk) 23:56, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, you may try to renominate, correct page would be Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Triton-en.svg/2. Regards --A.Savin 02:13, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- Forgive me, I have tried, but I do not know how to do this. Every attempt I make ends up generating a page that I suspect will not be see by FP reviewers or has incorrect dates on it. Can you help? A loose necktie (talk) 05:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Done. --A.Savin 14:06, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- Forgive me, I have tried, but I do not know how to do this. Every attempt I make ends up generating a page that I suspect will not be see by FP reviewers or has incorrect dates on it. Can you help? A loose necktie (talk) 05:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Bird photographs by date
Hier ist ein ganz neuer Kategorienbaum am entstehen. Und wenn der erst Mal toleriert wird, dann ist es auch nur noch eine Frage der Zeit, bis es das auch für Säugetiere oder Fische gibt. Was sagst du dazu? Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 14:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
@Sahaib: Why are you creating bird by dates categories? I don't think it's desirable. --A.Savin 14:24, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- @A.Savin: , Category:Railway photographs by date was created years ago. Sahaib (talk) 14:26, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Berlin Montage 2022.png
Hallo Alex, ist bei diesem Bild auch mit den Lizenzen alles korrekt? Schau es dir gerne Mal an. Ich weiß ja, dass du mit der Nutzerin schon einmal Probleme hattest. Schau dir bei Gelegenheit auch gerne Mal ihre neuesten Uploads vom Marathon an. Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 21:32, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Rathen und Elbsandsteingebirge asv2022-08 img04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rathen und Elbsandsteingebirge asv2022-08 img04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Photographer's Barnstar | |
Danke für die letzten Monate. Es war mir eine große Freude und ich freue mich auch schon auf zukünftige Zusammenarbeiten. Ich wünsche dir einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr. Lukas Beck (talk) 10:41, 31 December 2022 (UTC) |