User talk:Bgag/Archives 2014-2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Torana, Sanchi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:04, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Torana, Sanchi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:04, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Torana, Sanchi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stupa 1, Sanchi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:08, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elephant on East Torana, Sanchi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Though I had cropped the sky back to a square or near-square ratio, it is still good quality and QI. --Cccefalon 18:55, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 45, Sanchi 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:36, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Torana, Sanchi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:29, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Torana, Sanchi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:29, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elephant on East Torana, Sanchi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:44, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Torana, Sanchi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 22:17, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Torana, Sanchi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 18:33, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Torana, Sanchi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elephants on North Torana, Sanchi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock Shelter 3, Bhimbetka 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 14:17, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Torana, Sanchi 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock Shelter 8, Bhimbetka 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality but the dof, IMO, can be better--Lmbuga 16:05, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock Shelter 8, Bhimbetka 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock Shelter 3, Bhimbetka 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:46, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shiva Temple, Bhojpur 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:34, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock Shelter 6, Bhimbetka 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shiva Temple, Bhojpur 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportGood quality.--Lmbuga 00:14, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shiva Temple, Bhojpur 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock Shelter 15, Bhimbetka 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:50, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shiva Temple, Bhojpur 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 17:10, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shiva Temple, Bhojpur 06 - Lingam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:01, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shiva Temple, Bhojpur 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support not your best one - I don't like the plastic canister, but still useful and the quality is good for QI. --Cccefalon 19:23, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shiva Temple, Bhojpur 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:40, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shiva Temple, Bhojpur 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shiva Temple, Bhojpur 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I made an annotation concerning the composition. Please consider my proposal. --Cccefalon 18:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)  Done Good observation. --Bgag 19:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC) Good quality. Now really impressive. --Cccefalon 20:54, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock Shelter 3, Bhimbetka 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falaknuma Palace 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but needs a perspective correction and removal of the blurry bird --Cccefalon 20:22, 16 July 2014 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 20:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 21:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falaknuma Palace 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:36, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock Shelter 9, Bhimbetka 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falaknuma Palace 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falaknuma Palace 07 - Cannon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falaknuma Palace 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 23:28, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falaknuma Palace 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Falaknuma Palace, Hyderabad (exterior), North view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:07, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Démosthène 18:51, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, --Démosthène 18:51, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort 002 - Baradari.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:42, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort 006 - Cannon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 17:32, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baradari of the Golconda Fort, India (exterior) South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:25, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 16:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort 009 - Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:08, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosque of Ibrahim, Golconda Fort 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambar Khana, Golconda Fort, India (exterior) East view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 01:35, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosque of Ibrahim, Golconda Fort 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:47, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosque of Ibrahim, Golconda Fort 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:47, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:37, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:40, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zanaana Mosque 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zanaana Mosque 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Cccefalon 19:44, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort - Rani Mahal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Famberhorst 16:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort - Rani Mahal 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:19, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taramati Mosque, Golconda Fort, India (exterior) SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort - Rani Mahal 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 17:12, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort - Taramati Mosque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:14, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort - Taramati Mosque 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality Famberhorst 17:19, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort - Taramati Mosque 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:39, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort - Taramati Mosque 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:08, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort - Taramati Mosque 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:08, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Hayath Bakshi Begum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:01, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Hayath Bakshi Begum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:07, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golconda Fort 016 - Aslah Khana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It looks dusty. Contrast missing?--XRay 08:55, 3 August 2014 (UTC)  Done I have imported a new version. --Bgag 20:35, 3 August 2014 (UTC) OK now. Thanks.--XRay 15:50, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Sultan Muhammad Qutb Shah 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good IMO--Lmbuga 18:12, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Hayath Bakshi Begum, Hyderabad, India (exterior) South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 14:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Sultan Muhammad Qutb Shah, Hyderabad, India (exterior) South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Halavar (talk) 17:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Kulsum Begum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:28, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Sultan Muhammad Qutb Shah 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:05, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Kulsum Begum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 17:09, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Subhan Kuli 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:54, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Sultan Muhammad Qutb Shah 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:45, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Ibrahim Quli Qutb Shah, Hyderabad, India (exterior) SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:30, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Kulsum Begum, Hyderabad, India (exterior) SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 00:38, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:30, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Sultan Quli Qutb Shah, Hyderabad, India (exterior) SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 00:39, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Subhan Kuli Qutb Shah, Hyderabad, India (exterior) SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Subhan Kuli 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment there is a note on crop. Villy Fink Isaksen 16:01, 8 August 2014 (UTC)  Done I agree. --Bgag 19:00, 8 August 2014 (UTC)Qi to me. Villy Fink Isaksen 19:03, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Subhan Kuli 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi to me. Villy Fink Isaksen 16:01, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Muhammad Quli Qutb Shah, Hyderabad, India (exterior) NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Mirza Nizamuddin Ahmed, Hyderabad, India (exterior) NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hayat Bakshi Mosque, Hyderabad, India (exterior) SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Abdullah Qutb Shah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:45, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hayat Bakshi Mosque 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hayat Bakshi Mosque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, bright parts well managed. --Tuxyso 17:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hayat Bakshi Mosque 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good picture, but can you review the vertical lines, a bit tilted CW IMO--Lmbuga 16:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)  Comment New review: Perhaps the building is not straight, but the lines of the left, and someone of the right, are tilted CW--Lmbuga 16:35, 13 August 2014 (UTC) Done --Bgag 19:33, 13 August 2014 (UTC)  Support Better, thanks--Lmbuga 20:07, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hayat Bakshi Mosque 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very sharp--Lmbuga 16:23, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hayat Bakshi Mosque 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Livioandronico2013 13:17, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Qutb Shahi Tombs - small tomb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:35, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Qutb Shahi Tombs - minaret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:35, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hayat Bakshi Mosque 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:09, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Sultan Quli Qutb Shah 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:06, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Fatima Sultana, Hyderabad, India (exterior) SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Halavar (talk) 00:35, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Tomb of Fatima Sultana 01.jpg: -1
2. Tomb of Fatima Sultana 02.jpg: +1
=>
File:Tomb of Fatima Sultana 01.jpg: Declined.
File:Tomb of Fatima Sultana 02.jpg: Promoted.

--Halavar (talk) 11:09, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paigah Tombs 06 - minaret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Ladli Begum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not sure about composition, but good quality--Lmbuga 23:52, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizam's of Hyderabad Throne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:06, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chowmahalla Palace 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:33, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chowmahalla Palace 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chowmahalla Palace gate tower, Hyderabad, India SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chowmahalla Palace 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 07:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minaret of the Mecca Masjid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:59, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chowmahalla Palace 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Care to try an improvement? see annotation --Cccefalon 12:18, 4 September 2014 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 19:29, 4 September 2014 (UTC) Well done. --Cccefalon 07:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minarets of the Charminar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:32, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minaret of the Charminar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Your edit

Good evening, Bgag. Have a look at this diff link. Was there a special purpose to revert my review? Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 18:29, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

• Hi Cccefalon, I didn't do that by purpose. When I added my pictures there was a conflict and I did the same thing as usual. I don't understand what happened. --Bgag (talk) 18:49, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

No worries, that happens. Just wanted to make sure, that you don't silently disagree with my promotion of Poco's image. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 19:03, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clock of the Charminar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:17, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decoration on the Charminar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 18:58, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyderabad 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK now. --JLPC 18:36, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Char Kaman, Hyderabad, India South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Nice. Yann (talk) 15:25, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Udayagiri Caves - Rani Gumpha 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 20:45, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église de Sainte-Famille, Boucherville, Canada (facade) West view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancien couvent de la congrégation de Notre-Dame, Boucherville, Canada (exterior) NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful & best in scope Jiel (talk) 20:35, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Udayagiri Caves - Rani Gumpha 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 14:57, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Udayagiri Caves - Rani Gumpha 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:32, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Udayagiri Caves - Ganesha Gumpha 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:44, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Udayagiri Caves - Ganesha Gumpha 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:44, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hathi Gumpha, Udayagiri Caves, Odisha, India SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 17:21, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 19:00, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rani Gumpha, Udayagiri Caves, Odisha, India SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 18:20, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 19:00, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Udayagiri Caves - Ganesha Gumpha 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 19:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ganesha Gumpha, Udayagiri Caves, Odisha, India South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Udayagiri Caves - Ganesha Gumpha 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:48, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Udayagiri Caves - Sarpa Gumpha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:44, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Udayagiri Caves - Ganesha Gumpha 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:34, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parasuramesvara Temple, Bhubaneswar, India (exterior) SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 20:32, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Siddeshvara Temple, Bhubaneswar, India SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. __JLPC (talk) 20:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parasuramesvara Temple - Lingam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image --DKrieger 18:07, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parasuramesvara Temple 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image --DKrieger 18:10, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mukteshvara Temple, Bhubaneswar, India SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:33, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parasuramesvara Temple 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit oversharpened IMO, but good picture--Lmbuga 04:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Udayagiri Caves - Rani Gumpha 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:59, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parasuramesvara Temple 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:15, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parasuramesvara Temple 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parasuramesvara Temple 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 14:24, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parasuramesvara Temple - Elephants.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 14:24, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanti Stupa, Dhauli - Lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:25, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lingaraja Temple 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:44, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parasuramesvara Temple 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:40, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shanti Stupa (Dhauli), Odisha, India, West view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:56, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rajarani Temple 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lingaraja Temple 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rajarani Temple 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IndianOil in Pipili.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:20, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pipili, Odisha 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:23, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pipili, Odisha 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:05, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rajarani Temple 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --JLPC 15:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vaishnava Temple, Konârak 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:15, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mayadevi Temple, Konârak 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 21:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cosmopolitan Hotel, San Diego (exterior) West view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dance Pavilion, Konârak - Elephant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:57, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mayadevi Temple, Konârak 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dance Pavilion, Konârak - Lions.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:55, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dance Pavilion, Konârak - Lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Judge Richard Egan House, San Juan Capistrano, California (exterior) SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 22:41, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:23, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vaishnava Temple, Konârak, India NE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 22:42, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:37, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mayadevi Temple, Konârak, India NE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:37, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mayadevi Temple, Konârak 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:25, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sree Chaitanya Gaudiya Math, Puri, India (exterior) SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mayadevi Temple, Konârak 13 - Crocodile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:17, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Surya, Konârak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:17, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chariot wheel, Konârak 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:24, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chariot wheel, Konârak 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mayadevi Temple, Konârak 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mayadevi Temple, Konârak 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:14, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mayadevi Temple, Konârak 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice quality --C messier 14:30, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mayadevi Temple, Konârak 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chariot wheel, Konârak 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:38, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chariot wheel, Konârak 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculptures on Sun Temple, Konârak 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculptures on Sun Temple, Konârak 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peanuts vendor, Puri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:43, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chariot wheel, Konârak 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:10, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chariot wheel, Konârak 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street scene, Puri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. -- Spurzem 16:51, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jagannath Temple, Puri 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:04, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jagannath Temple, Puri 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:15, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jagannath Temple, Puri 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jagannath Temple, Puri 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nirmal Hriday, Kolkata (exterior) SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:49, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jagannath Temple, Puri 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auto rickshaw, Kolkata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street scene, Kalighat, Kolkata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. 40 years ago, I saw exactly the same sceneries, exept the plastic bags, of course! --Hubertl 14:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street scene, Kalighat, Kolkata 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Road, Puri 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Hubertl 16:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cycle rickshaws, Puri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 15:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street scene, Kalighat, Kolkata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 14:52, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheetalnathji Jain Temple 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:37, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheetalnathji Jain Temple 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheetalnathji Jain Temple 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheetalnathji Jain Temple 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:14, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheetalnathji Jain Temple 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheetalnathji Jain Temple 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice. --Livioandronico2013 16:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheetalnathji Jain Temple 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:13, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheetalnathji Jain Temple 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street sign, Kolkata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 18:19, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boat on Hooghly River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:38, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buoy in Hooghly River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:54, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture workshop in Kumortuli, Kolkata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:59, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture workshop in Kumortuli, Kolkata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --C messier 15:08, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallick Ghat Flower Market, Kolkata 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. but needs urgently some postprocessing! --Hubertl 21:37, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taxi of Kolkata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:27, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boats on Hooghly River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:27, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Howrah Railway Station, Kolkata (exterior) NE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:48, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:55, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victoria Memorial, Kolkata - West facade 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:18, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pavilion at the Victoria Memorial, Kolkata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:18, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Paul's Cathedral, Kolkata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 22:22, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Paul's Cathedral, Kolkata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The tower is slightly leaning ccw. Please clone out the blurry bird (see note) --Cccefalon 06:05, 14 November 2014 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 14:56, 14 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

New user template

Hello.

I've created a new template to describe yourself : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:User_info2

I've use it on my user page.

Regards. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:52, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galapagos land iguana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Holleday 21:35, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cotopaxi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:54, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimborazo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:46, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue-footed booby 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:15, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swallow-tailed gull 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:19, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galapagos land iguana of Santa Fe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:52, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cruz giant tortoise 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:38, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! American oystercatcher in Santa Cruz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:32, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuenca, Ecuador 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:53, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingapirca 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:53, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Colombo 01.jpg

File:Colombo 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anton^Talk 22:11, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swallow-tailed gull (juvenile).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:11, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

New level {{User PH-3}}

Hi ; new level 3 for you ?

PH-3

This user is able to take high quality photographs.

--ComputerHotline (talk) 08:51, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks but I don't know. Probably more a level 2. --Bgag (talk) 20:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lava Heron in Santa Fe Island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good for me. --Hockei 12:13, 25 December 2014 (UTC)