User talk:Otets

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:WilliamShakespeare1610.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

I've nominated this image just because we have a bunch of them and this one doesn't appear to have anything over the other existing ones, but it's still an appreciated contribution. :-) Dcoetzee (talk) 21:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by: --Nikbot 05:36, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Your upload form doesn't fit my needs, so in any case I always set up the correct details and license manually, after the upload process. But you have to give me some minutes for this ;-) --Otets (talk) 05:41, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 17:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Al-Farghani Statu 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 20:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rëmelenger Schmelz 1909.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 09:56, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:NapoleonBliederdeeg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 18:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

22:14, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Gambia-Koart(politesch).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Les Meloures (talk) 09:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Schéin. Déi Koart ass awer net vu mär, also ass et mer och egal wat dermat geschitt. Ausser et wier fir z'insistéieren datt "Koart" angeblech eng falsch Schreifweis wier. Fir Lëtzebuerger Koinè wier d'Schreifweis falsch, mee wee seet dann datt e Lëtzebuerger just däerf Dateien eropluede mat engem Numm deen am Lëtzebuerger Koinè ass? Commons ass fir d'ganzt Welt, et däerf ee senger Datei also en Numm ginn op Englesch, op Kisuaheli oder an engem vun de Lëtzebuerger Dialekter. A fir den Dialekt aus dem Süden ass d'Schreifweis richteg, all aner Schreifweis wier falsch. Fir et ganz krass ze soen: Ech dierft op Commons meng Dateinimm souguer mat kyrilleschen oder armenesche Buschtawe schreiwen, an déi Dateie géifen nawell net geläscht. Eppes aneschters wier d'Bildbeschreiwung an der Informatiounskëscht, do kanns de effektiv Koinè verlaangen. Awer net an den Dateinimm, well och wa Koinè an de Medië gebraucht an enseignéiert gëtt sou ass dach all Dialekt gläich, e gesetzlecht Héilëtzebuergesch gëtt et net a just dorun orientéiert sech Commons. Du däerfs zwar gär derfir militéieren (an ech dergéint), mee soulaang s de keng Ännerung vum Gesetz vun 1984 erreechs, sou laang kënne Commons-Dateien en net-Koinè Numm kréien. De CPLL këmmert sech just ëm d'Schreifweis vun der Koinè an net drëms de Koinè obligatoresch ze ma soubal een de Bak opdeet oder e Wuert tippt. An Texter fir d'ganzt Land oder fir gemeinsam Projete wéi d'Wiki ass et natierlech evident datt mer eis op een Dialekt eenege mussen an dat ass eben d'Koinè, kloer. Diskussiounen an Dateinimm falen dogéint ënner Gebraddels a Gekrozels, dat éischt ass perséinlech, an dat zweet net relevant well soss hätten d'Nachméirikaner d'Englescht fir Dateinimm obligatoresch gemat. --Otets (talk) 12:19, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Esch-Lalleng (Kierch).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]