User talk:Moroder/Archives 2012-3

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Station of the cross Sacun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plans de cunfin y Saslonch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

I'm using one of your photos, thanks!

You have a great photo of the Grand Canal in Venice (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Canal_Grande_from_the_Accademia_bridge.jpg). It's going in a tiny app slideshow. Just wanted to thank you for posting such a great photo (found it through the Quality Images section on the commons) and that you've been properly attributed. user:Ssnseawolf

Thanks for the appreciation --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:59, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Römer Seiser Alm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good (I'd wanna live in this house:)) --Florstein 16:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lusenberg-Addolorata detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting detail. QI for me. --JLPC 17:58, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Cathédrale Segovie déambulatoire.jpg

¡ Buenas noches Moroder !

As I was firmly holding my camera along a column (no tripod available at the moment), sorry no, it is not me on the picture :).

I've "scratched" out two other (moving) tourists, but it was impossible for this one, due to his position... In my opinion, he gives a bit "life", and a idea of the scale too.

Muchas gracias for promotion anyway.

¡Ole!--Jebulon (talk) 23:34, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

PS: could you consider archiving your talk page, please ? It is a very long time to come here below !--Jebulon (talk) 23:36, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

You read in my mind, I was going to ask you for help to archive my talking page. Can you do it for me please?

 Done Please, enjoy and rejoyce !--Jebulon (talk) 10:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

I agree. I think people in a picture are always good, they give the proportion and make the photos much more alive specially when the pictures become old. I understand that you became spanish!?? --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langkofelhütte in Gröden mit Langkofelgruppe general view.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:25, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Piere Ramitzler Ciani Resciesa 2012 059.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 13:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Piere Ramitzler Ciani Resciesa 2012 067.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice. --JDP90 13:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Piere Ramitzler Ciani Resciesa 2012 082.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo. --Florstein 16:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Piere Ramitzler Ciani Resciesa 2012 090.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lusenberg-Addolorata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI IMO --Vassil 12:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa-Anna-y-Maria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 09:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus Berlin Charlottenburg Stiegenhaus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 08:44, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramitzler Schwaige St. Peter bei Lajen 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --Florstein 18:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramitzler Schwaige St. Peter bei Lajen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 18:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of the Seiser Alm from the Langkofelhütte.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Kreuzschnabel 12:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Villa Rifesser Stufan Urtijëi.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Villa Rifesser Stufan Urtijëi.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Rillke^(q?) 10:37, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Nach 5 Monaten muss ich es eben formal erledigen. -- Rillke^(q?) 10:38, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

 Erledigt --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josef Kostner tla dlieja da Sacun.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Gardena with Sella and Saslonch from Resciesa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atlas4 Giusto Le Court Chiesa dell'Ospedaletto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atlas1 Giusto Le Court Chiesa dell'Ospedaletto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jäger Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entrance Pfarrkirche St. Ulrich in Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy, but acceptable IMO.--Jebulon 16:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Need of a specialist

Sehr geehrter Signore Dottore,

this picture is going to be promoted in QIC. Did you see it ? Could you please, as you are a specialist, give (or not) your benediction ? Maybe it is good, but maybe not, and it would be a pity if a non-scientific picture would be promoted.

Thanks for your alert. Sorry, but the diagram is a complete nonsense (wrong). Unfortunately Imagenote does not work on my computer and browsers anymore (I use google Chrome and alternatively IE) there is no way to fix it. Otherwise I could place notes to explain what is wrong on the diagram. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks in advance (and please send you bill to the Wikimedia Foundation ).--Jebulon (talk) 23:52, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

What bill? Money? I send it at the end of the year --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Backscatter on Resciesa Val Gardena.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Backscatter on Resciesa Val Gardena.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 16:44, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Church of Saint Antony in Urtijei front.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Church of Saint Antony in Urtijei front.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 16:45, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tagusens oswald anna unterberger 158 copie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I would prefer upright format without the disturbing parts of Way of the Cross. -- Lothar Spurzem 12:36, 10 September 2012 (UTC)  Upright crop Thanks for the review. You convinced me, changed also perspective and contrast --Moroder 14:26, 10 September 2012 (UTC) Good quality now -- Lothar Spurzem 17:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siegesdenkmal Bozen east.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Florstein 16:19, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschian Alm und Weg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Florstein 16:54, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose Dolomiti Rosarium Uhrerhof Dëur.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 09:14, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello,

I wanted to use your picture for my Thesis.I hope I can.I will specify you as the author and will also mention the Source.Please let me know if I need to have your written Permission letter.Thank you. Regards,Shriya Kafle.

I'm delighted that you ca use my picture. You don't need a written letter. Please let me only know which picture and which Thesis. regards--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:25, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chedul y Cir .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Putti Altar in Tagusens Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:34, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noahs Ark Relief polichromed wood relief Urtijëi .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me. Prenn 03:20, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eingangsportal Ranuihof Vilnöß.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 22:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emmaus relief polichromed wood relief Urtijëi .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Ximonic 20:23, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja sacun chiena digon 038 copie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:19, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Ulrich from Augsburg in the battle Parish church St. Ulrich in Gröden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 12:22, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bulacia dl vieres del Sciliër.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Superb view, but also en:Colour_banding on the sky--Iifar 18:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC) I understand you but I don't know how to correct it --Moroder 22:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC)  Done See comment from the Graphic Lab/Photography workshop : "I don't think it is a colour banding but it seems to be a very weak stratum of a cloud (stratus)." ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 09:48, 13 September 2012 (UTC) --Moroder 10:01, 13 September 2012 (UTC) If it's cloud, promotion. Mattbuck 13:03, 15 September 2012 (UTC) It looks like subtle color banding to me, not cloud layers. Adjusted by applying Gaussian blur to blue sky only as a separate layer, omitting jet contrails from blurring process, then merging blurred layer onto original image. The camera should not have produced color banding, but the metadata of the original version showed the file had been manipulated with Adobe Photoshop. — Quicksilver@ 21:58, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja Sacun Santa Barbara.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 19:13, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja Sacun San Niculau.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dark line on the right is a bit disturbing, but it's nevertheless QI to me. --Iifar 17:51, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja Sacun autere Urtijëi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Iifar 17:44, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja Sacun Santa Ursula.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me --DKrieger 18:12, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja Sacun Santa Maria Maddalena072.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me --DKrieger 18:12, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deckenfresco Martin Knoller.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments crop a bit narrow but QI for me --Taxiarchos228 06:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utia de Stevia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality. --Iifar 10:24, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mont de Frëines cun Saslong.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and pretty view --Ximonic 12:13, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja dla pluania de Urtijei .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 11:30, 21 September 2012 (UT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja Urtijëi viere depënt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:10, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crespeina Mont de Sëura Val.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:53, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abt Georg Untergaßmair Neustift.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Kadellar 10:14, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musikkapelle St. Ulrich in Gröden - Marketenderin.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 10:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ultrasound scan of a normal human placenta and umbilical cord.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I think "Ultrasound images" should appear in the scope, my dear colleague. Very good topic and achievement. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:23, 20 September 2012 (UTC) Done thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:33, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Very Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:29, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:07, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dlieja sacun Urtijëi Santa Dorotea .JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dlieja sacun Urtijëi Santa Dorotea .JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja dla Pluania de Urtijei cansla zipleda.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:02, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja sacun chiena digon 040.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great nice, far over QI threshold --Poco a poco 08:02, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Einweihungsfeier der renovierten Raschötzer Kapelle über St. Ulrich in Gröden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Composition is a bit messy, but this was probably difficult to avoid. --Cayambe 12:44, 21 September 2012 (UTC)  Comment it was a mess/mass --Moroder 18:51, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja Sacun Santa Catarina d'Alessandria.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 20:50, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja sacun Urtijëi Santa Dorotea .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 20:50, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja Urtijëi viere depënt Giuani Batista.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 11:17, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your amizing baby)))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja sacun chiena digon 101.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 19:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Elisabeth of Hungary Parish Church of Urtijëi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--JLPC 17:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pic mont de Mastle y Ncisles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 20:51, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Piere Urtijei corrected.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iifar 06:44, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja sacun medallion dio padre.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: The Grialëces creek.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
The Grialëces creek.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Very interesting -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:11, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja sacun tabernacul.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 20:18, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cristlpech a Urtijei.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI now Poco a poco 19:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sagittal section of fetal Myelomeningocele.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:49, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ultrasound axial scan of normal fetal posterior fossa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:58, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja sacun dedite dl viers dl autere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 11:45, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Einweihungsfeier der renovierten Raschötzer Kapelle über St. Ulrich in Gröden Teilnehmer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 21:22, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja sacun fresco cun apostuli a man ciancia dl autere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality! --Florstein 18:44, 28 September 2012 (UTC)  Comment Very sharp but too bright. Look at the door-frame. -- Lothar Spurzem 22:32, 28 September 2012 (UTC)  Info The door frame ist perfect, look at the histogram --Moroder 20:55, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ultrasound scan of fetal esophagus at 12 weeks of pregnancy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It lacks "Ultrasound Image" in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:26, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)