User talk:Sic19
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:14, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Worsley-far.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Worsley-far.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Wikidata field in artwork template
[edit]Hi Sic19, this change is incorrect. The Wikidata field is to link an image of an artwork to the artwork item on Wikidata. Multichill (talk) 10:26, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Images from Geograph Britain and Ireland
[edit]Hello. I notice you've been uploading pictures to Commons from Geograph Britain and Ireland. This is good and you should continue. However, you have been marking them with a subtly wrong licence. Geograph uses CC BY-SA 2.0, but you've often used {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}}. One way to get this right is to use Geograph2Commons, a link to which you can find at the bottom of the "reuse" page attached to each Geograph image (like this one). Alternatively, you can use the {{Geograph}} template with your favourite upload mechanism. Fill it in with the image number and author name, like this: {{Geograph|4886724|Mark Stevenson}}. --bjh21 (talk) 12:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, this is really useful information and I'll make sure to add the correct licence to future uploads. Sic19 (talk) 14:05, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Carr Manor Cottages.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Carr Manor Cottages.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Carr Manor Cottages.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 17:21, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Use of PD-old-assumed
[edit]Hi, please avoid using this template where it is irrelevant due to age, or having no named author. In the case of Phil and lit society Leeds book stamp.png at the time of upload you identified this as 198 years old and with no named author. --Fæ (talk) 12:16, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Granary At Stanks Farm.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Granary At Stanks Farm.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Granary At Stanks Farm.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 15:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
File:County Arcade Victoria Quarter Leeds (15298646840).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B dash (talk) 05:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Bradford, Lister Park (40843606342).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
your upload probs
[edit]Hi Sic19, thanks for contributing to our project! I just noticed your problems when you tried to upload some images. They are caused by URL shorteners like goo.gl, flic.kr or youtu.be which are not allowed here to be used as web links. If you used the full URLs instead it will run smoothly. Regards, --Achim (talk) 19:17, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Uploads and categories
[edit]Thank you for uploading more pictures of Yorkshire! However, please check whether you can put them in the proper categories straight away. For instance, Beverley Minster is not in West Yorkshire, and there is already category for it. Also, there are categories for many streets in Leeds, Bradford, and other cities and towns where some files could have been placed in upon upload. --Schlosser67 (talk) 13:28, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Westfield Terrace, Leeds (35029494103).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Schlosser67 (talk) 09:00, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Bibliotheek - Capelle aan den IJssel (30397669576).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JopkeB (talk) 16:09, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Bibliotheek - Capelle aan den IJssel (30397669956).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JopkeB (talk) 16:11, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Fenham Library.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Fenham Library.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Fenham Library.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 22:03, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Regent Street, Leeds (35704680321).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Schlosser67 (talk) 14:52, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Regent Street, Leeds (35704736311).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Schlosser67 (talk) 14:56, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Poplar Gate, Leeds (36062106695).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Schlosser67 (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Leeds and Liverpool Canal (33691425664).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Schlosser67 (talk) 14:16, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
bad bot edits
[edit]Sic, Your edit here, hare and many similar edits adding second wikidata ID to images are breaking pages. Please adjust your script and watch Category:Pages with script errors for files you edit. --Jarekt (talk) 13:12, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Another issue: in Carew Castle, in Pembrokeshire (Q23767386), you added both Handle ID (P1184) and image (P18) which are mismatched (see history). Please verify your other edits. --Jarekt (talk) 13:25, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Jarekt: Why not be helpful and provide a list of the problems you have identified? Then I can fix them and the problems are resolved. Also, I have removed multiple incorrect QIDs that have been added to this collection by other editors - but I know they probably made a genuine mistake and haven't started complaining on both Commons and Wikidata.
- Have you realised that the structured data from Wikidata corrects the errors with the dimensions in the Commons metadata? That is a good reason not not merge the Wikidata items.
- Finally, your scrutinising of my edits on both Wikidata and Commons is making me feel slightly uncomfortable. I would have preferred to discuss what are clearly related issues either here or on my Wikidata talkpage before you asked the community whether you can start merging items. I hope this is a misunderstanding and we can work constructively together to improve data quality. Simon Cobb (Sic19 ; talk page) 19:24, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Just to add, sorry if I am being overly defensive - I am hoping this structured data can be used in a (meta)data roundtripping case study and it is preferable that no breaking changes are made. But would be very grateful for help that improves that data quality. Thanks and best wishes, Simon Cobb (Sic19 ; talk page) 19:32, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Simon, Sorry if it feels like I am stalking you. I just did some changes to Module:Artwork and {{Photograph}} and was monitoring Category:Pages with script errors for any errors my edit might be causing and instead I found a lot of errors related to edits by your bot. I assume that many were due to other people adding, often incorrect, Q-numbers to the files you are working on. I fixed all the problems I have identified, since I needed to empty Category:Pages with script errors. But there seem to be a lot of mismatches between images in Handle ID (P1184) and in image (P18). I will see if I can be more helpful. The question with merging is not about you, but more of a discussion with community, since I do not think we want items for every print of some engraving, which might have large number of identical copy. --Jarekt (talk) 02:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Jarekt: Thanks for your message and especially for fixing the problems caused by my edits - I really appreciate you doing that. You don't need to apologise to me - bringing these problems to my attention and discussing potential merges is appropriate. Unfortunately, I read the merge discussion on Wikidata first and I didn't immediately realise what had happened. Then I saw you message here and started looking for problems in an empty category. On reflection, this is my fault not yours, so I am sorry for that.
- It is two years or more since I created the Welsh Landscape Collection Wikidata items but I remember some problems with the metadata and image not matching at the handle location - in these instances, I used the Handle ID (P1184) for the correct metadata and therefore the image will appear to be incorrect. It is also possible there are actual errors on Wikidata - it is likely to require some research to sort this out.
- Do you know if after a work by (P1877) is mapped to any Commons templates? A lot of these files still have unstructured data in the artist field - removing the string will import the creator (P170) from Wikidata but information will be lost if the P1877 value isn't imported too. If not, using creator or data templates seem like viable options. Simon Cobb (Sic19 ; talk page) 20:06, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Simon, Sorry if it feels like I am stalking you. I just did some changes to Module:Artwork and {{Photograph}} and was monitoring Category:Pages with script errors for any errors my edit might be causing and instead I found a lot of errors related to edits by your bot. I assume that many were due to other people adding, often incorrect, Q-numbers to the files you are working on. I fixed all the problems I have identified, since I needed to empty Category:Pages with script errors. But there seem to be a lot of mismatches between images in Handle ID (P1184) and in image (P18). I will see if I can be more helpful. The question with merging is not about you, but more of a discussion with community, since I do not think we want items for every print of some engraving, which might have large number of identical copy. --Jarekt (talk) 02:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Just to add, sorry if I am being overly defensive - I am hoping this structured data can be used in a (meta)data roundtripping case study and it is preferable that no breaking changes are made. But would be very grateful for help that improves that data quality. Thanks and best wishes, Simon Cobb (Sic19 ; talk page) 19:32, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Simon, I did some Wikidata queries and compared them with data on Commons and most files seem to look fine, but I have in User:Jarekt/a files where something is off, image in P18 does not match the handle or something else is wrong. I will continue looking at them tomorrow, but may be you can have a look earlier --Jarekt (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- I fixed files and items in User:Jarekt/a. There were many cases where images were swapped between 2 items. --Jarekt (talk) 12:15, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Map of French départements
[edit]Hi,
I just notice that you created map like Data:Morbihan.map (and apparently all european French départements), that wonderful ! THANK YOU A LOT !!
As I'm a perfectionist, I have some remarks/questions :
- maybe we can a better naming pattern, including the source, maybe something like Data:Natural Earth Admin1/Morbihan.map?
- could we add categories?
- should I delete Data:France/Departement/56.map (I created only 4 départements, by hand as the source wasn't in GeoJSON, it's more detailed but I probably won't do the other départements and it needs a better naming too)
- would it be possible to have other map, for instance of communes of France?
Voilà, tell me what you think.
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 12:37, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Hi @VIGNERON: ,
- If we are changing the name format, I think something like your Data:France/Departement/56.map works well. This is not something have a strong opinion about and, if you want to rename them, please do so. For me, the most important things are the link to Wikidata and the ability to use the geoshapes in SPARQL queries. But, please let me know if you change the format so I can follow it when making more geoshapes.
- We are not using categories on the .map or .tab datatypes - I cannot remember if there is a reason or not. It would make sense to add categories. Maybe we should start adding categories?
- I have an AWB workflow for creating geoshapes from geoJSON (converted into CSV), which I can share with you if you want to create more maps. I want to create Admin 1 for every country from the Natural Earth dataset but I don't get much time to work on it.
- Do you think a geoshape workshop would be a good Celtic Knot session?
- All the best, Simon Cobb (Sic19 ; talk page) 14:25, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the answer,
- I'll think a bit more about the name format but I'm guessing we need names as unique as possible. France/Departement/56 can be the name of both Data:France/Departement/56.map or Data:Morbihan.map, that's why the source should maybe included in the name (or not, to be continued...).
- Yeah, I totally agree for the possibility to do query (in fact, I discovered the maps you created via a query using d:Q12642 which as two geoshapes
).
- I asked about categories in 2017 (Data talk:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather/New York City.tab), it as not possible back then but I hoped it was finally possible :/
- YES, I would love to see your AWB workflow (I used a lot AWB but only for minor and simple regex).
- Maybe not a workshop but it definitely worth at least a lightning talk at the Celtic Knot!
- Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:52, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
File:OGL symbol black big.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
神樂坂秀吉 (talk) 04:32, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
File:OGL symbol 41px retina black.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
神樂坂秀吉 (talk) 04:32, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
FYI
[edit]Hi, just in case you didn't notice: Your flooding the log was caused by the use of URL shorteners like bit.ly or youtu.be. Using full URLs instead should work. Regards, --Achim (talk) 14:57, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:STEPHEN FRY BOOK MARK PROMOTION (17141697184).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:STEPHEN FRY BOOK MARK PROMOTION (17141697184).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:STEPHEN FRY BOOK MARK PROMOTION (17141697184).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:36, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:CROSSING THE TEES (27526995051).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:CROSSING THE TEES (27526995051).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:CROSSING THE TEES (27526995051).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:45, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Out by Natsuo Kirino (129346059).jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Out by Natsuo Kirino (129346059).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:58, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Perfume by patrick suskind (130394665).jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Perfume by patrick suskind (130394665).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:59, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Postcards by annie proulx (140502100).jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Postcards by annie proulx (140502100).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:59, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Fatal Remedies by Donna Leon (142988441).jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fatal Remedies by Donna Leon (142988441).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:59, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:The Tortilla Curtain by T.C. Boyle (148391774).jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:The Tortilla Curtain by T.C. Boyle (148391774).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:59, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Libro. El fumador pasivo. (133330876).jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Libro. El fumador pasivo. (133330876).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
And also:
- File:Pollen by jeff noon (132074576).jpg
- File:The alchemy of desire by tarun tejpal (135029714).jpg
- File:Car sick by lynn sloman (137523747).jpg
- File:The Book of Mrs Noah by Michele Roberts (156486742).jpg
- File:Tokio blues (155813684).jpg
- File:Death and the Penguin by Andrey Kurkov (185022488).jpg
- File:Atomised by Michel Houellebecq (233849984).jpg
- File:Libro La revolución de los blogs (228308115).jpg
- File:Libro recibido The Long Tail (354205505).jpg
- File:Libro La comunicación en situaciones de crisis del 11-M al 14-M. (368797095).jpg
- File:Technology matters (441734949).jpg
- File:Primer llibre regalat per Sant Jordi (468879688).jpg
- File:Libro Capitalism 3.0 (1423460915).jpg
- File:Libro recibido El rebaño ciego (2054464621).jpg
- File:Libro ColorIURIS. Una aportación independiente a la cultura libre (2167769831).jpg
- File:El gran libro de Mortadelo y Filemón (2168561936).jpg
- File:Libro. Patter recognition (2443461510).jpg
- File:Libro. Nocilla Experience (2443463148).jpg
- File:Libro. Gran Enciclopedia de Aragón Preta (2522555504).jpg
- File:Libro. Guía para padres inexpertos (2522549778).jpg
- File:Libro. Apocalipsis Friki (2522552556).jpg
- File:Love, Prayer, Leadership. (504953757).jpg
- File:Libro. la luz y el misterio de las catedrales. (9648691428).jpg
- File:Bradbury (15502042128).jpg
Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:04, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Abzeronow (talk) 15:54, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
File:J.R.R. TOLKIEN AT THE BODLEIAN LIBRARY (6892146884).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Ubcule (talk) 20:11, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
File:JOHN LE CARRE AT THE BODLEIAN LIBRARY (6892145730).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Ubcule (talk) 20:11, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Categories
[edit]Please add categories to your uploads, otherwise they just end up in a huge, delayed bucket for someone to sort out later. Even Category:Penryn, Cornwall is better than nothing, because there's no guarantee that anyone is yet interested enough in Wikidata to marry the two together. Thanks. Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:47, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I have more images to upload and then I will add categories with AWB as per usual. Simon Cobb (Sic19 ; talk page) 08:58, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
File:Clearance Books I bought at Half Price Books (2946205315).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
CptViraj (📧) 08:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Day/date category
[edit]Hello Simon (Sic19), Why have you reverted the date/location category I added to your photos of Bartholomew street in Exeter, Is the date and location incorrect? If you do not want this to be added to your photos in future please let me know and I will not include them in Date/location categories Kolforn (talk) 06:04, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Kolforn, after uploading a batch of photos I use AutoWikiBrowser to add the date, category, my name as author and change the license to CC0 - it is not really necessary for you to add the date and location. Your edits were not incorrect but I would prefer the date metadata contains only a date and not 'Taken on...', which is the reason I edited it. Thanks for your efforts though. All the best, Simon Cobb (Sic19 ; talk page) 07:01, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
File:City Business Library (15141152282).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Blythwood (talk) 07:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey
[edit]Dear Sic19,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.
Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
V&A anomaly
[edit]Hi Simon, I have been working through some V&A photographs that you uploaded, and I have spotted an error in their metadata. Do you have a contact there I can pass this back to? File:Ruins of Sweetheart Abbey, Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland (O55416).jpg is really Greenan castle, and one of Greenan castle is really of Sweetheart Abbey. WereSpielChequers (talk) 09:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- hi @WereSpielChequers: , unfortunately not - the upload of these images wasn't a partnership and I don't have any contacts at the V&A. Sorry. Simon Cobb (Sic19 ; talk page) 15:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, surprisingly high proprtion of those buildings were still with us. WereSpielChequers (talk) 16:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Lesbury
[edit]We've no images of the bowstrung bridge at Lesbury, and only one of the old bridge, if you're in that area. https://wikishootme.toolforge.org/#lat=55.39745217598821&lng=-1.6350746154785156&zoom=18 --Tagishsimon (talk) 11:17, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @Tagishsimon: isn't Lesbury New Bridge the bowstrung bridge? And I tried to get a photo of the old bridge yesterday but sadly couldn't find an spot to get a clear shot of it. Simon Cobb (Sic19 ; talk page) 11:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- It is; I stand corrected. Wonder why those are not showing up on wikishootme. You need wellingtons. Or a canoe. Hope you get some sunlight, too. --Tagishsimon (talk) 11:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
OpenRefine starts SDC development! 💎
[edit]Hello Sic19! As you may be aware, OpenRefine has started development of features for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons. Would you like to be informed about ongoing work? You can sign up here to receive occasional updates on a Wikimedia talk page of your choice. Also, feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions! SFauconnier (talk) 16:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Volunteer sign (35092277366).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Minimundus Slovenian national library (40450025).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TadejM (t/p) 00:13, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
bjh21 (talk) 13:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Bridge Cottage (geograph 6327800).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Bridge Cottage (geograph 6327800).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Bridge Cottage (geograph 6327800).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Vurt by jeff noon (124387032).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Chiolite (talk) 12:30, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Wall of Intellect (29977120691).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 09:48, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Mural, Church Road, Crystal Palace (geograph 5599812).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Your opinion about OpenRefine and its Wikimedia Commons features: two (!) surveys
[edit]Hi! You have recently tried/used Wikimedia Commons features in OpenRefine (uploading files, or editing existing files). I'm curious to hear how this has gone, also if you only briefly tried these features.
To help the OpenRefine team with future improvements, it would be immensely helpful if you would be willing to spend a bit of time filling in two surveys. (Yes, two! Each of them uses a different method and (open source) platform).
- A first, classical, survey (fully anonymous) where you can tell us how you use the Commons features in OpenRefine, and how you (want to) learn to use them better;
- A second, more experimental survey (also fully anonymous) in which you prioritize the features that matter most to you. This second survey is a bit strange in that you can 'just keep clicking'. Feel free to use it as long or as briefly as you want; you can stop any time. Please also add your own suggestions!
Many thanks! With kind regards, SFauconnier (talk) 18:21, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Poster in Barking learning centre (42762051081).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 05:53, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Sylvester Sound, the Somnambulist has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Jmabel ! talk 03:08, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Thank you for your work on the "depicts" statements! :] Suntooooth (talk) 23:13, 1 July 2024 (UTC) |
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:22, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Start a discussion with Sic19
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikimedia Commons the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Sic19. What you say here will be public for others to see.