User talk:Silverije
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Grb obitelji Feštetić.jpg was uncategorized on 4 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Tržan-grad (Modruš) - jugozapad.JPG was uncategorized on 24 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:14, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Dvorac Feštetić, Pribislavec (2011) - jug.JPG was uncategorized on 31 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:39, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Dvorac Feštetić, Pribislavec (2011) - sjeveroistok.JPG was uncategorized on 1 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:12, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Otočac (Croatia) - centar.JPG was uncategorized on 3 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:11, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Kozji sir Zadravec (Medjimurje, Croatia).JPG was uncategorized on 15 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:55, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Sv.Juraj na Bregu (Croatia) - centar.JPG was uncategorized on 31 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Štrigova (Croatia) - panorama.jpg was uncategorized on 2 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 07:33, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Kočija Međimurskog konja (Croatia).JPG was uncategorized on 15 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:02, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Crkva, Gornji Kuršanec (Croatia).JPG was uncategorized on 26 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 21:57, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Dvorac Oršić, Gornja Stubica - ulaz.jpg was uncategorized on 29 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:25, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Predikatno vino Pinot bijeli (Croatia).JPG was uncategorized on 4 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:16, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Danke
[edit]hallo silverije, erstmal danke für deine mitteilung deiner emotion für die fotos - ozalj - , finde ich auch, leider geben sie nur einen teil wieder. bern kommt nicht aus bern, sondern aus deutschland und ein hard spare ich, immerhin 4 buchstaben mehr bzw weniger beim schreiben. verstehe dich nicht, was du meinst bzgl hilfe ? Übersetzen in die jeweilige sprache ? stimmt da könnte ich manchmal hilfe benötigen. bilder liegen immer im blick eines betrachters, da dieser ort ein stück heimat ( wahlheimat ) ist, schaut man/n vielleicht auch auf " nebensächlichkeiten " die einen ort / gegend / .... ausmachen. Lg in den norden Bern_Bartsch
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:04, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
TUSC token 1bd0bbe7c74d0e340e6797c003ab3981
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
File:Katarina Zrinska - detalj spomenika u Čakovcu.jpg and File:Petar Zrinski - detalj spomenika u Čakovcu.jpg
[edit]Please add the name of the sculptor and ideally the year of installation. --Túrelio (talk) 21:57, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Rijeka Gacka (Croatia) - pastrve.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Rijeka Gacka (Croatia) - pastrve.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 20:04, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Elizabeta Austrijska (Sisi) - spomenik u Trstu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
91.64.222.96 07:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Coats of arms of the Republic of Dubrovnik has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Zoupan (talk) 22:01, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Hajdinske črne čurke (Međimurje, Croatia).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ijon (talk) 13:54, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
So instead for deleting the information, why don't you either fix it or nominate it for deletion? Either is better than what you did and more work for other editors, even if it gets deleted later. For now I've reverted your edit. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 15:06, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Azra.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Yerpo Eh? 20:59, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Vlastimirova Srbija
[edit]Ja ne razumem stvarno zašto tebi smetaju mape? A vi što stavljate da je Hrvatska u 10. veku držala Bosnu, to nikon ništa, ČAK I AKO VAŠ IZVOR PORFIROGENIT KAŽE DA JE BOSNA U STASTAVU SRBIJE.
Ovu mapu si takodje stavio da je netačna, a radio ju je Novaković Relja, jedan od najboljih srpskih istoričara svog vremena. I mogao bi malo da pogledaš izvore koje sam stavio umesto da staviš da je netačna. MilosHaran (talk) 13:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
File:Povijesni zemljovid Bosne i Hercegovine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
j.budissin+/- 23:20, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Books published in Basle has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Traumrune (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Association handball executives from Croatia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 07:19, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Multiple photos tagged for speedy deletion
[edit]- File:FIFA 2018. - Zlatko Dalić nakon pobjede protiv Engleske 11.7.2018.jpg
- File:FIFA 2018. - Mario Mandžukić daje gol protiv Engleske 11.7.2018.jpg
- File:FIFA 2018. - Dejan Lovren govori na Jelačićevom trgu u Zagrebu.jpg
- File:FIFA 2018. - Doček hrvatske reprezentacije na Jelačićevom trgu u Zagrebu.jpg
- File:FIFA 2018. - Hrvatska reprezentacija na Jelačićevom trgu u Zagrebu.jpg
(I'm not watching this page, but I am watching the pages for the files). Lijep pozdrav, Wumbolo (talk) 16:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Međimurska kuharica.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Međimurska kuharica.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Međimurska kuharica.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 10:28, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Alen Sambolec; Bitka.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Alen Sambolec; Bitka.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Alen Sambolec; Bitka.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 10:28, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 04:03, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Aleksandar Schulteis.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aleksandar Schulteis.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Aleksandar Schulteis.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Smooth O (talk) 09:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:L. Bezeredy.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:L. Bezeredy.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:L. Bezeredy.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Smooth O (talk) 09:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Noć muzeja 2019, Čakovec - plakat.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Noć muzeja 2019, Čakovec - plakat.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Noć muzeja 2019, Čakovec - plakat.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 09:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Yes, Prime Minister!.JPG
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Yes, Prime Minister!.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Silverije,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Silverije,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Silverije,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.
We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.
|
Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hrvoje Hitrec; Samo sreća, ništa drugo.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hrvoje Hitrec; Samo sreća, ništa drugo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hrvoje Hitrec; Samo sreća, ništa drugo.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 17:54, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Međimurski fašnjak 2017.- gusari.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lars Gustavsen (talk) 14:15, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
File:Srpska vojska 2018. odaje počast fašističkom vođi četniku Draži Mihailoviću.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Smooth O (talk) 08:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Ante Kostelić.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ante Kostelić.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Ante Kostelić.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Smooth O (talk) 08:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Ante Kostelić.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Smooth O (talk) 08:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi.
[edit]This is incorrect and you know that. You should accept your mistakes, please read Freedom of panorama and also De minimis . I will report this. --190.231.219.124 20:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Željko Kipke; Veduta iz 1970.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
190.231.219.124 20:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Ladislav Kralj Međimurec - autoportret (~1960).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
190.231.219.124 20:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Adam Zrinski.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
190.231.219.124 20:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism warning
[edit]
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
File copyright status
[edit] Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Kuruzna zlevanjka (Međimurje, Croatia).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kuruzna zlevanjka (Međimurje, Croatia).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kuruzna zlevanjka (Međimurje, Croatia).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 10:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Temfanje (Međimurje, Croatia).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Temfanje (Međimurje, Croatia).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Temfanje (Međimurje, Croatia).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 10:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Spomen ploča 300. obljetnice smaknuća P. Zrinskog i F. K. Frankopana 1671.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:Spomen ploča 300. obljetnice smaknuća P. Zrinskog i F. K. Frankopana 1671.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Spomen ploča 300. obljetnice smaknuća P. Zrinskog i F. K. Frankopana 1671.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Miljenko Grgić.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Missvain (talk) 22:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Teniski mušketiri.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Deinocheirus (talk) 01:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Ratni zarobljenici kod Bleiburga.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Ratni zarobljenici kod Bleiburga.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Ratni zarobljenici kod Bleiburga.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Caska - uvala.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:Caska - uvala.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Caska - uvala.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:06, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hej bok. Možda si propustio, sad sam naletio, već dugo vremena ti je ovaj file postavljen na brisanje. Nešto si zaboravio staviti, događa se. Vidjet ćeš odmah o čemu se radi. Pozdrav --Vhorvat (talk) 15:40, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Nisam najbolje vidio, vjerojatno sam bio umoran, mislio sam da je bio slučaj kao sa onim mojim zadnjim fileom, pojavio se problemčić odmah kod uploada, jednostavno sam kod jednog od par mojih vlastitih fotki zaboravio postaviti licencu i robot je odmah našao. To sam odmah ispravio bez problema. Inače svi drugi koje si vidio su sa Flickra i to su tuđe fotke, a i meni osobno bile su nekako na granici uvjeta da zadovolje licence, neke su prošle naknadnu procjenu, neke nisu. Za neke nisam niti skužio, kao za Hello Kitty gdje se previše vidjela ona mačkica na jednoj majici izloženoj ispred trgovinice u Dubrovniku. Zauzimala je oko 20 do 25% slike i to je bilo previše jer onda narušava copyright.
- Kasnije sam detaljno proanalizirao problem oko tvoje fotke i zaključio da je najvjerojatnije pogriješio robot, te sam se uključio u raspravu. Vidio sam da si stavio {{own}} pa sam onda o tome postavio pitanje. Ja mislim da si sve dobro označio. Pozdrav --Vhorvat (talk) 03:05, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Ako se mogu uključiti: nemoj pisati nikakve komentare, dodaj licenciju (kao što inače stavljaš {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
) i mirna Bosna.-- Ma▀▄Ga 15:25, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hvala, dečki. --Silverije 15:48, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Ma zeznulo me što sam se navikao gledati ono "own" te se uvijek slagalo da je također postavljena licenca. Na starom kompu sam imao šprancu za unos i link za direktno uploadanje, te sam samo izeditirao ono što je potrebno, tako sam puno manje griješio. Nisam htio žuriti, ali mi se čini da nisi primijetio kako si spomenut ovdje: [1]. Tamo je i rješenje. Kada sam ja zaboravio kliknuti za licencu, isto tako "nije mi uneslo". Usporedbom dva svoja filea, dobrog i problematičnog skužio sam što nedostaje. Tako sam i sada usporedio dva tvoja filea. Inače koristimo istu licencu. Iako si iskusan korisnik svejedno ću napisati i ono očigledno, tako da bude što manje "pimplanja". Nedostaje ti cijelo poglavlje:
- =={{int:license-header}}==
- {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
- Oprosti što toliko idem u detalje, kad ručno dodaš licencu, onda imaš pravo maknuti onaj template za brisanje i sve počistiti što ne treba stajati. --Vhorvat (talk) 13:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 00:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Kostelić.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Smooth O (talk) 08:21, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
Pozdrav,
Ako smijemo (a prema licenci fotografije mislim da smijemo, ali nisam siguran) voljeli bi vašu fotografiju šibenske katedrale uvrstiti na jednu od karata u našoj društvenoj igri Bon Voyage koju mislimo kao hrvatski suvenir izdati 2023. godine? Na karti fotografije svakako bi bila vaša atribucija, a na linku i ostali podaci. Tražimo vaše dopuštenje i vaše puno ime i prezime za potrebe atribucije. :) srdačan pozdrav, Žarko Pintar Zpintar (talk) 09:36, 26 November 2022 (UTC) |
- Pozdrav,
- Hvala na poruci. Nisam u potpunosti siguran o kojoj se fotografiji šibenske katedrale radi, pa bih te molio poveznicu. Ali u svakom slučaju, što se tiče mojih fotografija na Wikimediji Commons, sve su one slobodne, ne treba nikakva licenca. Ja postavljam ("uploadam") fotografije zato jer volim i želim surađivati, te unaprijediti i obogatiti Wikimediju Commons, koliko je to u mojoj mogućnosti. Što se tiče imena i prezimena, dovoljan je samo moj suradnički pseudonim Silverije, koji je isti već skoro 14 godina, i po čemu me mnogi znaju, a potječe od jednog pape iz 6. stoljeća, Silveriusa. Kroz cijelo to vrijeme imao sam mnoga dobra i loša iskustva na Wikipediji. Među loša spadaju i ona s hakerima koji su me pratili i koji me prate i sada, te mi otežavaju rad. Najviše je onih iz srpskog ekstremističkog miljea, koji sve što je hrvatsko nazivaju ustaškim. Stoga je sasvim dovoljno da su javnosti dostupni oni podatci koji su na mojoj suradničkoj stranici. Tim više što mnogi drugi suradnici nemaju nikakve podatke o sebi, pa čak ni mnogi administratori (osobito na Wikipediji na drugim jezicima). Neki se očito skrivaju jer imaju nečistu savjest, a neki zato da bi mogli biti nekorektni ili čak bezobrazni. Ja na sreću nemam tih problema. S poštovanjem, --Silverije 00:27, 27. studenog 2022 (UTC)
Evo, radi se o ovoj fotki https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C5%A0ibenik,_Katedrala_sv._Jakova_-_sjeveroistok.jpg Jako m se sviđa za potrebe moje igre Bon Voyage kojom žeimo promovirati Hrvatsku i hrvatski turizam. Radi se o ovoj igri: https://bonvoyagegame.com/ Ako imate još kakvih lijepih fotki za potrebe igre iz raznih dijelova Hrvatske svakako bih bio zainteresiran. Možda imate negdje popis fotki, pa da pogledam čega sve ima? :)
lp, Žarko — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zpintar (talk • contribs) 12:53, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
Poštovani,
Pronašao sam još jednu lijepu vašu fotografiju na wikipediji iz Čakovca, pa bi vrlo vjerojatno i nju stavili na kartu naše društvene igre, koju možete vidjeti u prototipu ovdje: https://bonvoyagegame.com/ Radi se o ovim fotografijama: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C5%A0ibenik,_Katedrala_sv._Jakova_-_sjeveroistok.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Porcijunkulovo,_%C4%8Cakovec,_2014._-_ki%C5%A1obrani.3.jpg Ako želite, možemo još neke fotografije uvrstiti u društvenu igru, samo ne znam koje sve imate? srdačan pozdrav, Žarko Pintar Zpintar (talk) 18:39, 27 November 2022 (UTC) |
- Hvala na odgovoru. Drago mi je da su ti moje fotografije zanimljive. Sve su dostupne na Wikimediji Commons i možeš odabrati koju god želiš. Ja nemam nekih posebnih želja koje fotografije bi odbrao. S poštovanjem, --Silverije 19:11, 29. studenog 2022 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
[edit]- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,