User talk:RockyMasum/Archive 03

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nirmalendu Goon's Home (front-left view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:24, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear RockyMasum,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ratargul 0276.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ratargul 0276.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bagakain Lake (view from north end).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear RockyMasum,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fazle Hasan Abed.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Resolution is not perfect, but its the best picture in scope -- Arne (talk) 18:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Afran Nisho (cropped).jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Afran Nisho (cropped).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 12:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sesame Seed Candy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looks good at first sight, is maybe a little bit grainy by looking closer. Any more thoughts? --D-Kuru 01:14, 11 January 2020 (UTC)  Support For me it is good enough. --Kritzolina 21:59, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kazi Nazrul Islam Auditorium (front side).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Best in scope, but is it possible to remove the dust spots? -- Arne (talk) 17:21, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - That's a question, not a discussion. "Discussed" is for when there's a disagreement on whether a file is or is not a Valued Image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shahid Tajuddin Ahmad Senate Building (front view), University of Rajshahi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Teknaf Beach (south-east exposure), Bangladesh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
BGB Jetty Ghat, Teknaf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

FV Promotion

This file has been promoted to Featured media! The file File:Mru women performing the Chiasotpoi dance.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Mru women performing the Chiasotpoi dance.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FVCBot (talk) 05:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keokradong 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bogurar doi (A type of yogurt).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:04, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! মাথিনের কূপ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! সামুদ্রিক মাছ, সেন্ট মার্টিন্‌স দ্বীপ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality, overall. -- Ikan Kekek 18:12, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bangladesh Navy officers' mess at St. Martin's Island.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Perspective correction necessary. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Union Council office of St. Martin's Island (front view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Could you put this in a separate category for the office? With hundreds of images in the category for St. Martin's Island it's hard to say if this is the best of this building. Buidhe (talk) 19:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
• @Buidhe: A separate category has been provided.--Rocky Masum (talk) 11:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope Buidhe (talk) 18:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lighthouse in St. Martin's Island at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I modified the scope a bit. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 00:24, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:24, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hookah at Sajek Valley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Khrangsuri waterfalls, (front right view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I fixed your scope. The view shouldn't be linked with the main part of the scope. pandakekok9 06:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope IMO. Lighting is good to me, compared to other photos. --pandakekok9 06:13, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southern part of Konglak.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - How does a hill have a rear? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:39, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• @Ikan Kekek: I define it regarding the entry path of the tourists. Actually it is the southern part of the hill. --Rocky Masum (talk) 08:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

• So please use that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: Done.--Rocky Masum (talk) 14:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks, Rocky Masum. Which other photos in that gallery are of the southern part of the hill? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: No other photos.--Rocky Masum (talk) 19:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support - OK. Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:19, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:06, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bangladesh-Myanmar border 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments If there's a category for Teknaf, please add it. This is a quality photo, but there are 4 light but sizable dust spots that should be removed. If you look carefully, you can see them at thumbnail size. 3 form a triangle toward the upper left corner and the other is above the billow of the cloud. -- Ikan Kekek 12:27, 30 April 2020 (UTC) Category added and fixed the dust spots. --RockyMasum 14:13, 30 April 2020 (UTC)  Support - I still see 3 very light dust spots, but this is a good photo and I think it's a QI, anyway. See what you can do, though. -- Ikan Kekek 04:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11th Convocation of University of Rajshahi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 20:28, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Well of Mathin 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 20:28, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teenage Mahout.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality. --Fischer.H 16:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boat in front of Well of Mathin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image but further categorization needed --MB-one 09:33, 4 May 2020 (UTC) @MB-one: Category updated. --RockyMasum 11:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Well of Mathin 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:23, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bidargho.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:17, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moon boat at Teknaf sea beach 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:46, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moon boat at Teknaf sea beach 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:34, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moon boat at Teknaf sea beach 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 07:00, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moon boat at Teknaf sea beach 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:59, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moon boat at Teknaf sea beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moon boat at Teknaf sea beach 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:32, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moon boat at Teknaf sea beach 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bogura railway station (East exposure).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and a pretty picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logistics Sector of WFP, Ukhiya, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh (Front side).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill at kutubdia 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:08, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lengurbill beach 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lengurbill beach 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, I would change the aspect ratio to 4:6 --Isiwal 18:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lengurbill beach 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Kritzolina 10:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)  Comment Agreed. Possible FP? I'm not sure, but you could try it. -- Ikan Kekek 10:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boats at Lengurbill beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 08:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lengurbill beach 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please align the horizon. --Ermell 19:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC) Done. --RockyMasum 01:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutubdia Windmill Power Generation 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is leaning in. Could you please fix it? --XRay 04:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC) @XRay: Fixed. --RockyMasum 16:17, 13 September 2020 (UTC)  Support It's acceptable. But, sorry, it's only a very weak promotion. The quality of the camera of your smartphone isn't really good. Some quality issues could be better. Do try to use RAW format? It's a way to reduce JPEG artifacts. --XRay 11:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC) @XRay: I did not try the RAW format. Thanks for your suggestion. Next time I will keep it on my mind. --RockyMasum 03:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill at kutubdia 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Strong tilt to the right (check the sea), but also some perspective distortion. Level of detail is not the best, but for me it would be acceptable when perspective issues fixed --Jakubhal 19:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC) @Jakubhal: Perpective correction done. --RockyMasum 05:52, 21 September 2020 (UTC)  Support Thank you. Ok --Jakubhal 12:30, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rohingya Refugee Camp 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I really like how the picture emphasizes the contrasts that are there on the ground - the lush, green (protected) nature and the humans struggling to survive in dire conditions. An image that stays with me. --Kritzolina 15:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marine drive near Lengurbill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 15:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lengurbill beach 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lengurbill beach 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Mistake in bn.wikipedia POTD page for October

Thanks for selecting my image of Thenu village as POTD. In the page bn:টেমপ্লেট:আজকের_নির্বাচিত_ছবি/অক্টোবর_২০২০#২৬ the thumbnail appears in 26th and 28th, though it appears to be selected for 28th only. --Tagooty (talk) 01:49, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

@Tagooty: Initially I set it for 26th. Due to Durga Puja I changed the photo with a photo of Durga and set the mentioned photo for 28th. May be due to cache, you see the thumbnail on both days.--Rocky Masum (talk) 11:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

 Thank you. --Tagooty (talk) 13:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear RockyMasum,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Entrance of Ali Kadam Cave.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Is File:Ali Kadam Cave 03.jpg a picture of the entrance? If not, I would agree that this nomination is best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
• @Ikan Kekek: , No, your mentioned picture is the inner side of the cave. Through the hole, people enter into the cave.--Rocky Masum (talk) 06:56, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope. I figured that other photo was within the cave; thanks for confirming. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:36, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Chestnut-tailed starling - কাঠ শালিক.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chestnut-tailed starling - কাঠ শালিক.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ariel view of Shapla Square, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ariel view Mujibnagar Memorial.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:15, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ariel view of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's tomb complex.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerial view of Martyred Intellectuals Memorial.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerial view of Jatiyo Smriti Soudho complex.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:45, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ariel view of Bangabandhu National Stadium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Front view of Suborno Jayonti Tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It is necessary to correct the right tilt and the perspective --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Top vie of Kantanagar Temple.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arial view of Lalbagh Qila.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ariel view of Somapura Mahavihara.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Aerial views

Hello

I see you have some aerial views. How are you getting them? Drone? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim Evans (talk • contribs)

@Jim Evans: Those photos are not taken by me. All the photos belong to Pinu Rahman.--Rocky Masum (talk) 03:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks -- Jim Evans (talk) 12:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ariel view of Sixty Dome Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaliardip, Cox's Bazar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jaliardip island.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Front view of St. Martin's Police Outpost.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:24, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:22, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Swadhinata Stambha.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Seems best in scope, but I'd prefer a second opinion as well. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:19, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 23:55, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A plate of red sauce pasta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bangladesh–Myanmar border.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Rather low resolution, but IMHO good enough for QI. --Domob 16:59, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bangladeshi Polao 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Domob 08:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

VIC steam engine

I reverted your edit as I had deliberately left "status=nominated" to give you a chance to respond to my suggestion on the wording of the scope. A "steam engine" may be stationary, may be used in mines and other places, while a "steam locomotive" moves and is used in railways. Once you respond, I'll do the needful. --Tagooty (talk) 02:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

@Tagooty: My bad. I thought you forgot to change the status, as you put the support tag. Anyway the "engine" is replaced by "locomotive". Thanks for your clarification.--Rocky Masum (talk) 04:01, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

 Thank you. --Tagooty (talk) 04:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
First ever steam locomotive of Bangladesh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used in bn, de, en Wikis. I suggest that the word "engine" be replaced by "locomotive" be used as that is the word in the Category. --Tagooty (talk) 02:42, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for change of word in scope. --Tagooty (talk) 04:32, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Huseyn-Shaheed-Suhrawardy.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait photography of Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:24, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mausoleum of three leaders.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Very good, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 15:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:56, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cooking stoves of clay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Mithila 2018 (cropped).jpg

File:Mithila 2018 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: source =https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6w_4QhE1fPg collected (screenshot) from a video by Jamuna TV which was live streamed at Facebook and currently available on their Youtube channel Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Afeef.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! সেন্ট মার্টিন দ্বীপের নৌকা.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:27, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vemicelli Shemai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 23:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moon boat at Teknaf sea beach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 23:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunrise at Sajek Valley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, very nice photo. Alvesgaspar 21:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tree at Chimbuk Tourist Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lengurbill beach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I will support. Good quality. --Andrey Korzun 20:13, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulling boat the sea beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality. --ADARSHluck 16:05, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments According to sea level we can see that picture is tilted to the left a little bit. --Halavar 17:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC) Fixed. --RockyMasum 17:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:15, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boga lake 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:49, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pot of curd at primary stage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Surely not 48MP worth of data here, but overall ok for QI, imo. --DXR 20:23, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please crop the image after rotation ... Alvesgaspar 11:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC) Cropped. --RockyMasum 12:16, 17 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sloping horizon --F. Riedelio 06:38, 18 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Interesting composition. --Palauenc05 22:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Ferdausi Rahman.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotikot Mura, Comilla (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:05, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chhota Govinda Mandir 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful image, can you correct the verticals slightly? --Prburley 22:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC) Corrected. --RockyMasum 08:42, 29 October 2021 (UTC) Good quality now. --Kritzolina 18:42, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Your featured media upload

Hello Rocky Masum!

My highest appreciation for your upload of this great video. This is a useful and unique video documentation, of which there are too few on Commons. I hope that more such media will come from you

Best greetings !!

Hillopo2018 (talk) 09:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

@Hillopo2018: Thank you for the appreciation.--Rocky Masum (talk) 14:04, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at QIC talk page

A discussion is being held here, over the reviewing process at QIC and the possibility of improving our Image Guidelines. As a regular contributor to the project, your opinion would be most welcome and valued. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:04, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Camp in Charge Office of Nayapara Refugee Camp.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I have reviewed this image against all the criteria and am happy to support its nomination. It is not a glamourous image, but then refugeee camps are not glamourous. Martinvl (talk) 18:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amiakhum Waterfall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Why is that better in scope than File:Amiakhum falls, bandarban , Bangladesh 5.jpg? Fullest view of the entire falls? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
• @Ikan Kekek: Yes, It helps us to get the entire view fo the waterfall.--Rocky Masum (talk) 12:30, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

• OK,  Support per above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:44, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latingma-লাতিংমা.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Remakri cannel in front of remaifo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Remakri cannel in front of remaifo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 16:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloudy Jina Para.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 15:10, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! লাতিংমা.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! রেমাক্রি খাল, থানচি.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice landscape, ok quality imo. --ArildV 11:50, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dim Pahar Road.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Is the road clearly recognizable from this photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
• @Ikan Kekek: The photo was taken from the highest pick of the road and normally everyone takes break at that place. This is the most recognizable location of the road.--Rocky Masum (talk) 11:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

• Great.  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:18, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Black-necked stork as POTD on 2/Mar/2022

Thanks for selecting this stork in flight and some of my other images for forthcoming POTD. I hope you recall that a similar image of the same stork in flight was POTD on 21/Oct/2020 --Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

@Tagooty: I also like to thank you for your awesome clicks. It helps us to put quality images for the POTD. We use photo of Bangladesh and India periodically as POTD. Hope we will get more from you.--Rocky Masum (talk) 12:35, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

My pleasure! --Tagooty (talk) 13:13, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tourist caravan, cox's bazar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 08:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 18:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

User:Masum-al-hasan/Credits

ভাই, উপরোক্ত টেমপ্লেটটি আমার মনে হয় |author= প্যারামিটারের পরিবর্তে |permission= প্যারামিটারে ব্যবহার করলে ভালো হয়। (অনেককেই তা করতে দেখেছি) সাধারণত |author= প্যারামিটারে নামের বাইরে কিছু থাকে না, আর টেমপ্লেটটি অনুমতি সংক্রান্ত —MdsShakil (talk) 17:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

@MdsShakil: বিষয়টি সামনে আনার জন্য ধন্যবাদ। permission প্যারামিটারে উপরোক্ত টেমপ্লেটটি স্বয়ংক্রিয়ভাবে কিভাবে দেয়া যায়? যাতে ছবি আপলোডের সাথে সাথেই টেমপ্লেটটি যুক্ত হয়ে যাবে।--Rocky Masum (talk) 11:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

আমার জানা মতে, আপলোড উইজার্ড দিয়ে এটা সম্ভব নয় তবে আপনি যদি Special:Upload ব্যবহার করেন তবে সেখানে যোগ করার অপশন পাবেন। যদিও এখানে অনেক ফিচার নেই। আমার মতে সবচেয়ে সহজ হলো আপলোড করে তারপর যোগ করা। ইতিমধ্যে আপনার যে ফাইলগুলোতে এভাবে আছে সেটা সংশোধন করে দিবো আমি? স্বয়ংক্রিয়ভাবে এটা করা সম্ভব হতে পারে —MdsShakil (talk) 14:57, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

@MdsShakilআপনি চাইলে প্যারামিটার পরিবর্তন করে দিতে পারেন। আমার মনে হয় পারমিশনে স্বয়ংক্রিয়ভাবে ট্যাগ লাগানোর সুবিধা খুব সম্ভবত আছে। বর্তমানে আমার ছবিতে ট্যাগটি স্বয়ংক্রিয়ভাবে Author অংশে যুক্ত হয়ে যায়। আলাদা করে ট্যাগটি লাগানো সময় সাপেক্ষ, বিশেষ করে যখন অনেক ছবি আপলোড করা হয়।--Rocky Masum (talk) 09:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martyred intellectuals' memorial plaque at RU.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)  Comment Borderline QI to me, but please nominate at COM:VIC. -- Ikan Kekek 09:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martyred intellectuals' memorial plaque, Rajshahi University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:12, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheikh Russel Model School.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 11:51, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

বিশ্বের সর্ববৃহৎ ছবি প্রতিযোগিতা উইকি লাভস মনুমেন্টস ২০২২-এ অংশ নিন

সুপ্রিয় RockyMasum,

বাংলাদেশের প্রত্নতাত্ত্বিক ও গুরুত্বপূর্ণ স্থাপনার ছবি তুলে ধরার উদ্দেশ্য নিয়ে আবারো শুরু হয়েছে উইকি লাভস মনুমেন্টস ছবি প্রতিযোগিতা। ১ অক্টোবর থেকে শুরু হওয়া এই প্রতিযোগিতাটি ৩১ অক্টোবর পর্যন্ত চলবে। প্রতিযোগিতার পাতায় দেওয়া বাংলাদেশের গুরুত্বপূর্ণ স্থাপনার তালিকা থেকে যেকোনও সময় তোলা যেকোনও স্থাপনার যত খুশি তত ছবি আপলোড করা যাবে। বিজয়ীদের জন্য আলাদাভাবে আন্তর্জাতিক ও জাতীয় পুরস্কার রয়েছে।

২০২২ সালের প্রতিযোগিতায় অংশগ্রহণ সম্পর্কে বিস্তারিত জানতে উইকি লাভস মনুমেন্টস ২০২২ পাতাটি দেখুন।

আপনি যদি টুইটার ও ফেসবুকে থাকেন, তাহলে হালনাগাদ সংবাদ ও আরো তথ্যের জন্য @WLMBangladesh অনুসরণ করুন।

আপনার যদি কোনও প্রশ্ন থাকে, তাহলে নিঃসংকোচে এখানে জানান। আসুন সবাই মিলে উইকিপিডিয়ার মাধ্যমে বাংলাদেশকে বিশ্ব দরবারে তুলে ধরি। ধন্যবাদ!

#wlmBangladesh আয়োজক কমিটি,
বৃহস্পতিবার ৬:৩১, ১২ সেপ্টেম্বর ২০২৪ (ইউটিসি)

File tagging File:Dj rahat (cropped).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dj rahat (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dj rahat (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Yours sincerely, — Haseeb (talk) 16:06, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Top view of Dhaka New Market.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
• Aerial view is better. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:50, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Top view of Mausoleum of three leaders.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Skimel (talk) 17:59, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
• Aerial view. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gowainghat 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:10, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Mru women performing the Chiasotpoi dance.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:A foggy winter morning.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A foggy winter morning.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fern leaf December.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shaheed Minar, Sylhet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support used, Too bad the flag is cut off.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:58, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Byomkes Chakrabarti.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Byomkes Chakrabarti.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Byomkes Chakrabarti.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Materialscientist (talk) 07:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

File:YSSY) - 52283850797.jpg

File:YSSY) - 52283850797.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 14:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on August 5

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, August 5th. We'll have two speakers: Poco a poco will provide us with an update on his underwater photography and George Oates from the Flickr Foundation will talk about the Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) that is currently in the works. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 5, 2023.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you on August 5th.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Quick reminder: Commons Photographers meeting this Saturday

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

This is a quick reminder that our next meeting will happen on Saturday, August 5th. If you haven't registered yet and you're interested in learning more about underwater photography and “Flickypedia”, please sign up on this page. Also, I invite you to fill out this survey created by the people who are working on the Flickr-to-Wikimedia Commons software. Your input will make a difference.

We haven't had a virtual meeting in a while and I'm so looking forward to this weekend!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

The Original Barnstar!

		The Original Barnstar
		For your valuable contribution to Commons over 9 years. Keep it up! ~Moheen (keep talking) 17:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

in preparation of the 2023 board election of our group, we invite you to take a look at the following page:

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2023

and provide feedback.

The timeline for the 2023 election will be

• September 15 – September 30: Applications for the election committee
• October 1 – October 9: Vote for election committee (ideally comprised of three members)
• October 10: Election committee starts work
• October 20 – November 9: Nomination phase for candidacies
• November 10 – December 10: Elections
• December 15: Results announced

In the first step we ask you to be part of the election committe. Please add your name on the Election Page.

We are very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.

All the best

--Ailura (talk) for the CPUG board

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! শহীদ মিনার, সিলেট 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:45, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sumaiya Shimu.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sumaiya Shimu.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sumaiya Shimu.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : আফতাবুজ্জামান.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 08:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023 - Nomination Phase

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

the 2023 board election of our group is run at

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2023.

The next steps in the timeline for the 2023 election are

• October 20 – November 16: Nomination phase for candidacies
• November 17 – December 10: Elections
• December 16: Results announced

If you are interested in being a member of the board, please nominate yourself on the Election Page.

We are very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.

All the best

--Ailura (talk) for the CPUG board

File tagging File:Sumaiya Shimu (cropped).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sumaiya Shimu (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sumaiya Shimu (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Syrus257 (talk) 11:52, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:সুমাইয়া শিমু.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:সুমাইয়া শিমু.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:সুমাইয়া শিমু.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Syrus257 (talk) 11:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sumaiya Shimu 05.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sumaiya Shimu 05.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sumaiya Shimu 05.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Syrus257 (talk) 11:57, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sumaiya Shimu 03.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sumaiya Shimu 03.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sumaiya Shimu 03.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Syrus257 (talk) 11:58, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sumaiya Shimu 02.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sumaiya Shimu 02.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sumaiya Shimu 02.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Syrus257 (talk) 11:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Dhriti Saharan in 2021 (cropped).jpg

File:Dhriti Saharan in 2021 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.instagram.com/p/CraAN35y7iE/?next=%2Frecanfazenda%2Ftagged%2F&hl=bn Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Syrus257 (talk) 12:23, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Mia khalifa by astarking.jpg

File:Mia khalifa by astarking.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Originally uploaded under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 Deed license Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Syrus257 (talk) 12:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Mia khalifa (cropped).jpg

File:Mia khalifa (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Originally uploaded under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 Deed Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Syrus257 (talk) 12:39, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Malay Bhowmick, Freedom fighter of 1971.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Malay Bhowmick, Freedom fighter of 1971.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Malay Bhowmick, Freedom fighter of 1971.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Syrus257 (talk) 15:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Malay Bhowmick in 1971.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Malay Bhowmick in 1971.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Malay Bhowmick in 1971.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Syrus257 (talk) 15:01, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Flickypedia soft launch and a huge thank you

Dear fellow Commons photographer,

I hope this message finds you well. As you might already know, the Flickr Foundation has been busy creating a new Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) this year. After a successful demo at the GLAM Wiki Conference in Montevideo, the Flickr Foundation team is now inviting all members of the Commons Photographers User Group to be the first to review their alpha, reporting any technical issues or other feedback via the Flickypedia project talk page.

At the same time, this message is an opportunity for me to thank you for your trust and support over the past couple of years. Since 2017, we've grown into being one of the largest user groups in the Wikimedia universe. I've tremendously enjoyed interacting with all of our members when it came to joint photowalks at Wikimanias, virtual Zoom meetings where we covered a wide variety of photography topics, as well as our annual “Most memorable shot of the year”, among many other events. As I'm not running for an official position in our current board election, this will be my last message on behalf of the user group to you. Thanks for all the happy moments we shared together over the years! I hope you'll continue creating free images for the millions of people we serve through Wikipedia and Commons.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

MUTCD file renaming requests

Hi, thanks for looking into the file renaming requests I made recently. I see that you've declined several of them because of existing redirects. I probably should've given clearer rationales, but it's hard to do per file.

All the files in Category:SVG regulatory road signs of the United States and similar categories are named according to a rigid pattern containing an official sign number from the MUTCD. The established naming convention for historic signs indicates the start and end years, where known, while the naming convention for current signs does not include a year.

A couple weeks ago, the 11th edition of the MUTCD was released; it renumbered quite a few signs and repurposed some of their numbers for unrelated signs. So we have to do a two-step, renaming one file to its new number, then uploading a new file in its place. But since I can't upload over a redirect, I temporarily added "(2023)" to some of the file names. These disambiguators shouldn't be there, because they imply that the signs are no longer in effect in 2024.

Most of the requests I've made have already been honored by other file movers and administrators; it's just these ones that you looked at that got declined. I've rerequested the renames that you declined, under the assumption that this was just a misunderstanding. (Incidentally, I also have a proposal to renaming some route shields as a result of this new MUTCD edition.) On the other hand, if we need to revisit the file naming conventions in general to avoid all this upheaval in the future, I'm willing to keep an open mind about that, as long as we can ensure consistency in the meantime.

 – Minh Nguyễn ^💬 06:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

@Mxn Thanks for your clarification.--Rocky Masum (talk) 13:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Match ticket of BD vs NZ at SICS.jpg

File:Match ticket of BD vs NZ at SICS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Syrus257 (talk) 05:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Deadline Approaching for Most Memorable Shot Submission!

Hello RockyMasum !,

Camera1 mgx

Commons-Photographers User Group-logo-en

Just a quick reminder that the deadline for submitting your most memorable shot of 2023 is swiftly approaching! As tradition holds, since 2018, we've been sharing our favorite captures from the past year with each other. This year marks the sixth iteration of our beloved "Most Memorable Shot" tradition, and we're excited to see what everyone has to share.

Whether you're a member of the Commons Photographers User Group or not, you're warmly invited to participate. Your unique perspective adds to the richness of our community, and we'd love to see the world through your lens.

So, if you haven't already, take a moment to pick out your most cherished picture of 2023 and share it with us on the designated page. The deadline is February 29th, so don't let time slip away!

Let's keep this wonderful tradition alive and celebrate the beauty and diversity of our collective experiences through photography.

Looking forward to seeing your memorable shots!

Best regards,

Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on April 13, 2024

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, April 13, 2024 at 9.00 UTC ( start time in your timezone (via zoneStamp!) (expected duration for 2 hrs). The primary agenda of this gathering will revolve around discussions regarding the Movement Charter. Your valuable input and participation in these discussions would be highly appreciated. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on April 13, 2024.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you.

All the best, -- Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

পুরস্কার বিতরণের সম্ভাব্য তারিখ

বাংলার প্রেমে উইকি ২০২৪" এর পুরস্কার বিতরণী অনুষ্ঠান‬টি কবে অনুষ্ঠিত হতে পারে? Sohel Commons (talk) 12:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

@Sohel Commons, আপনাকে পুরস্কার বিতরণী অনুষ্ঠানের আমন্ত্রণ জানিয়ে ইমেইল করা হয়েছে।-- Rocky Masum (talk) 14:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main Entrance of SUST.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Participate in the world's largest nature photo contest!

Hello RockyMasum, Project Korikath welcomes you to take part in Wiki Loves Earth Bangladesh 2024! Wiki Loves Earth (WLE) is an annual international photographic competition held throughout May and June. Project Korikath is the organizer of this year's Wiki Loves Earth in Bangladesh! You can visit the contest page for more details. You'll find the rules to take part in the contest there. You can also read this handbook for details about the campaign. Help us to showcase the breathtaking beauty of Bangladesh in Wikipedia and its sister projects. Let’s aim to bring Bangladesh to the top of the winner list among countries from all over the world this year! Cheers! Mrb Rafi (talk) On Behalf of Project Korikath

You're getting this message because you've participated similar Wikimedia photography contests in the past. If you'd prefer not to receive these updates from Project Korikath, you can unsubscribe by sending an email to korikath-ownerlists.wikimedia.org

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trichosanthes dioica (fruit).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:58, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shaheed Minar, SUST in 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 14:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alur dom & luchi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 14:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Azimronnie

Dear User:RockyMasum,

You have created this account: Is this your "dummy-account" (sock-puppet)? - ...or who did you create User Azimronnie for?. Your User:Azimronnie should take part in this ongoing deletion discussion. Would you please inform your User Azimronnie accordingly? - Best regards 2003:ED:D708:753F:5C0B:6DB:C061:50D6 16:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Ps.: The account you created (your dummy/sock-puppet?) is the double winner of the Folk Challenge/2024 (images/videos) and will receive both prize money: congratulations to you & best regards --2003:ED:D708:75DA:35FB:71B:7DD9:ECE1 07:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Do you have a problem informing the account you have personally created about the ongoing deletion discussion? Best regards --2003:ED:D708:75EE:ADAE:55C6:EF00:BCED 05:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

I am not interested in responding to an anonymous person.--Rocky Masum (talk) 06:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! --2003:ED:D708:75EE:ADAE:55C6:EF00:BCED 06:12, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

You are user/master of the (pure dummy) account @User:Azimronnie: congratulations to you on winning both challenges: Folk Video and Folk Image (which were apparently manipulated by...). - best regards --2003:ED:D708:7540:585:E4EA:1098:54ED 13:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

...and remember please: "To acknowledge your outstanding achievement and participation in the contest, we kindly request you to fill out this form by August 15, 2024. This will enable our international team to arrange for a well-deserved prize for you." - best regards --2003:ED:D708:7538:4D36:9093:205C:C04B 07:23, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

I already fill up this form. Thanks a lot. Azimronnie (talk) 10:44, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. Azimronnie (talk) 10:42, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rajshahi University School Bhaban (front side).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ReneeWrites (talk) 10:58, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! শহীদ শামসুজ্জোহার কবর.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:41, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murabba - মোরব্বা.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 09:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Faizul Latif Chowdhury.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Thi (talk) 21:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:40, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bangabandhu Railway Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharpness and detail borderline, but good enough quality. --Tagooty 03:00, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)