User talk:Benzoyl

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Revision as of 13:45, 20 July 2024 by Consigned (talk | contribs) (File:Japan Obama Hiroshima (27536341375).jpg has been nominated for deletion)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User talk:Benzoyl/log16 - User talk:Benzoyl/log15 - User talk:Benzoyl/log14 - User talk:Benzoyl/log13 - User talk:Benzoyl/log12 - User talk:Benzoyl/log11 - User talk:Benzoyl/log10 - User talk:Benzoyl/log9 - User talk:Benzoyl/log8 - User talk:Benzoyl/log7 - User talk:Benzoyl/log6 - User talk:Benzoyl/log5 - User talk:Benzoyl/log4 - User talk:Benzoyl/log3 - User talk:Benzoyl/log2

User talk:Benzoyl/log1 1-100 21:49, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Benzoyl 101- 11:13, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

archive 1

アップロードするファイルやファイル名の付け方など再考をお願いします

Benzoylさん、こんにちは。 多くのファイルをアップロードされていますが、下記などをお読みになってアップロードするファイルやファイル名の付け方など再考してもらえませんでしょうか？

--BunBun-J (talk) 03:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. User talk:BunBun-J --Benzoyl (talk) 03:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
「教育的な目的」については、他の方の選択次第でして、一概には言えません。例：

and more --Benzoyl (talk) 03:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

えーっと

お久しぶりです。ちょっと気になったのですが、上にも案内がきてますがコモンズの収載基準をごぞんじですか？
File:醤油煮 味噌煮 水煮 (22275074669).jpgもそうですが、いったいどのような教育的価値があるのでしょう？
削除依頼により削除されている写真も多そうです。もう少し考えてアップロードして貰えませんか？--Vigorous action (talk) 09:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

どうも。お久しぶりです。アップロード（というか拾い）したうちの幾つかは教育的価値に疑問があるものもあるかもしれません。
ただ、この缶詰を指摘されるのは結構心外です。黒金銀は、何らかの文化的影響のある選択（ゴージャス感？）とも考えられます。その他も含めて引き続き議論を継続いたしましょう。WPと異なり、こちらではキャラが変わってますかもしれませんが、よろしくお願いいたします。 --Benzoyl (talk) 09:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
なお、過去に削除依頼により削除されている写真のほとんどは、著作権問題 Copyright artworkのものです。--Benzoyl (talk) 09:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
例えばFile:Pink Pout (16795048267).jpg どう利用されるか分からないものです。（ru:Губы de:Altfränkische Sprache WPに限らず、[1]）--Benzoyl (talk) 09:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
じゃあ、著作権絡みでいうならこの写真伊藤食品さんの著作物の二次利用ですけど、ライセンスは無問題？伊藤食品さんは缶詰のデザインにもこだわりがあるようですけど。
さらに、File:イー・モバイル 2013 心斎橋筋 (9871988613) (2).jpgですけど、一般人の顔がわかる程度に写ってますが、被写体の許可などの権利関係の処理はお済みですか？--Vigorous action (talk) 05:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
文字だけを見ればテキスト何だろうけど、配色とかレイアウトってのもデザイン構成の一つですよ。
あと、フリッカーの写真はライセンスはCC-BY-SAになってても実は盗作ってのが結構あるので本当に必要なもの＆自分できちんとリスク判断出来るもの以外は手を出さない方がいいと思うよ。--Vigorous action (talk) 05:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
配色とかレイアウトは、本件は使用色の少なさから判断しました。話が五輪エンブレムみたいな流れになってますが。
他からの引用写真は、結構かどうかは分かりませんが、確かにありますね。#File:Small willy perhaps? (3504481977).jpgがそうでした。日本国内のは同一ユーザーの前後の写真も見てますので、判断できる感じとも思います（画質がまちまちなのとかはカメラ自体が異なってるなど）。何はともあれ、ご忠告ありがとうございます、と慎んで申し上げます。--Benzoyl (talk) 06:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
ああ、書き忘れてた。文字であっても『書』と見なされれば著作権は発生します。ちなみに鯖はだれが書いても写真の文字のようにはなりません。--Vigorous action (talk) 13:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
『書』としての独創性。例えば「イラスト素材: 鯛焼き」 [2] [3] 結構、字体似てますよね。魚の下の点3つを繋げるのは。 --Benzoyl (talk) 00:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
v_aさんの、トークページ過去ログ方法を模倣したら、ひどい目にあってしまいました（コモンズでは非推奨らしい）。
#Talk page archiving
といっても、私の自己責任ですが。
ただ、個人的には「過去ログ化後」の（編集履歴からの）アクセスとしては、v_aさん方式の方が便利と感じております。
以上です。失礼いたしました。--Benzoyl (talk) 00:10, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Men_handshakes

Category discussion warning

Men handshakes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Reguyla (talk) 18:27, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Massive creation of questionable categories. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. 
Beeblebrox (talk) 01:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Benzoyl (talk) 01:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ref - User:Benzoyl/Kenkyu

--Benzoyl (talk) 00:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page archiving

Archiving your talk page by moving it to an archive is not a 'standard' way to do it... it obscures the page history. Please read the instructions at COM:ARCHIVE. Material should be archived through a cut-paste move to the archive page. Thanks. Reventtalk 02:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[4] Sorry and thanks. I'll do my best reading COM:ARCHIVE --Benzoyl (talk) 02:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC) check of "page history" is very important. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I read [5] thanks.
But I should do over again now? ‎I do not know (understand) good enough.
Absolutely, Next chance in future, User talk:Benzoyl/log3 (Make in advance, after that, Copy<or>Cut and Paste to "log3") I don't make the same mistakes twice. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:51, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Incidentally, The same way in Japanese Wikipedia (user Mr.v_a [#えーっと]) - [6] I won't do this-way again. --Benzoyl (talk) 12:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Benzoyl:  Yes, just copy-paste the material to the archive page, then remove it from your talk page. (You can have this done automatically by a bot). That way the history of your talk page stays intact. Reventtalk 02:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no personal attacks

Personal attacks like this are not acceptable behaviour in Wikimedia projects. You may be be blocked if you continue to do it. Ankry (talk) 14:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's not, what I meant personal attack. true respect.
But, on this occasion, the misinterpretation arose. I'll never do that again.
English also Japanese, language is difficult. International communication is difficult.
That's why, It might be, There is "Photos", "Wikimedia Commons" for Non-verbal communication. Thanks. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

too many expensive function calls.

Archived to User talk:Benzoyl/log4 for reducing. But, still have trouble now, 2sections. 

{{Autotranslate|base=Idw/heading}}
  • 03:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
  • 04:08, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
  • 00:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

--Benzoyl (talk) 12:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

caused by #Bicolor ? --Benzoyl (talk) 02:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC) --Benzoyl (talk) 23:56, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:JR SKISKI Zenbu yuki no sei da as That's all because of the snow.jpg

File:JR SKISKI Zenbu yuki no sei da as That's all because of the snow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

G I Chandor (talk) 05:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mature_women

Category discussion warning

Mature women has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--ghouston (talk) 05:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 08:21, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:PNG diagrams in Japanese

Hi Benzoyl,

do we really need this category?--石炭発電所 (talk) 08:01, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There are 94 files (mean "many") in this category. I think "need". also by themes Category:Music diagrams in Japanese, Category:Biological diagrams in Japanese etc. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Degree_of_frost

Category discussion warning

Category:Degree_of_frost has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 00:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Charter_trams

Category discussion warning

Charter trams has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:17, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Outdoor_stages

Category discussion warning

Outdoor stages has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 07:34, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags

español ∙ galego ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Deutsch ∙ suomi ∙ עברית ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ македонски ∙ polski ∙ Nederlands ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ українська ∙ русский ∙ svenska ∙ +/−

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from images that you have uploaded yourself. If you do not believe the image deserves to be deleted, then click "Challenge speedy deletion" to convert the tag to a regular deletion request. Thank you.

You may also file a DR per COM:DR.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, File talk:Tokyo tour (27344854598).jpg ?
Sorry, I didn't know this rule. I will make sure that this will never happen again. (I'll be careful from now on.) --Benzoyl (talk) 11:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thank you, and please ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:56, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

archive 2

Category:Summer_holidays

Category discussion warning

Summer holidays has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 18:35, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 19:52, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Comic foregrounds

Category discussion warning

Comic foregrounds has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--El Grafo (talk) 12:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Six_and_nine

Category discussion warning

Six and nine has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 10:49, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:53, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:線路側オープン (536682209).jpg

Hi, I noticed this diff where you added Category:Danger. Where is "Danger"?--Kai3952 (talk) 05:44, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HI, Kai3952. I'm sorry for the delay in replying to you.
In this case, The doors opened on the opposite side of the Train station platforms.
I think, there is a possibility "another trains are coming". Therefore danger. What do you think, Thanks. --Benzoyl (talk) 22:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If a passenger sit on the door, or stuck in the door, or fall off from the door, then there is no problem with adding the "Danger" category. However, the problem is that this file just shows the doors opened on the opposite side of the platform and not enough to show "danger".--Kai3952 (talk) 16:30, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder "danger" = results (accidents), "risk" = possibility. In case, Surely the worker near the door looks cautiously = (not danger). --Benzoyl (talk) 23:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What I mean to say is, you think might happen does not really happen.--Kai3952 (talk) 18:40, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"The train doors opened on the opposite side of the platform" is it often (=common) case (in Taiwan)? --Benzoyl (talk) 03:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What I mean is that "Danger" is from your imagination rather than from the image "File:線路側オープン (536682209).jpg".--Kai3952 (talk) 07:58, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As I said before, I fail to see where the danger was in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 08:05, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

archive 3

Category:Groups_with_objects

Category discussion warning

Groups with objects has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 04:30, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:20, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shoulder_loops

Category discussion warning

Shoulder loops has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 21:28, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indoor

Category discussion warning

Indoor has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 09:47, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:37, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bamboo_walls

Category discussion warning

Bamboo walls has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 20:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 08:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Round_pizzas_by_slice

Category discussion warning

Round pizzas by slice has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Josh (talk) 00:28, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 21:13, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{Original upload date}}

Flickrの写真をアップロードする場合、Exifの中に撮影日があるのかどうかを確認してください。Exifに日付らしきものがあってもファイルの改変日（＝レタッチした日付）の場合もあります。撮影日がないと判定した場合は日付欄| Date= に {{Original upload date}} を使って下さい。枚数を沢山アップロードするよりも、1枚1枚をもっと精査して下さい。10年以上前に撮影した写真を今アップロードする人などざらにいます。 この画像などは、2020年6月撮影であるとは限りません。インスタグラムからFlickrに上げられたものについてはその月撮影の写真と推定して構わないケースもあると思いますが、そうでない場合は撮影日は不明とすべきです。ファイル名も雑すぎます。--トトト (talk) 11:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • これは、当方が使用させて頂いてるツール「Flickr 2 commons」側の仕様でして。1ユーザーが人力で逐一対処できるものではない（限界がある）と思うのですが…。あと最近は「沢山」はアプロドしておりません。--Benzoyl (talk) 00:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Flickrで閲覧して探し出す時点で撮影情報があるかどうかは分かりますよ。Flickr 2 commonsでアップアップロードしてから毎回分類なさっているわけですから、そのときに{{Original upload date}}を日付欄に入れてください。--トトト (talk) 04:27, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • そもそもレタッチした日付になってるのって、何割ぐらいあるもんなんですかね。稀なケースのものを探すために全部を毎回チェックするのを強いるのはナンセンスです。申し上げたいのはそういうことせす。
  • 割合まで調べてませんが結構ありますよ。ソフトによりますがRAWで撮影した写真をJPEGに出力しなおしただけでその出力した日付を入れてしまうものあるようです。さらに切り抜いただけでその切り抜いた日付が無意識に入ってしまう場合もある。コモンズに直接上げてくる人は撮影日の欄をきちんと入れ直す人が比較的多いと思いますが、Flickrなんか個人の写真帳ですからそこまで気にしない人の方が多いと思います。何百枚もアップロードおられるのにそんなこともご存じないとは思えませんが。--トトト (talk) 09:22, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • そして、カメラの時計設定自体が間違ってる場合だってあるでしょう。Exifを鵜呑みにしてはいけないかと。いかかでしょう。引き続き宜しくお願いいたします。--Benzoyl (talk) 06:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • 極限すれば撮影された日付がおかしいかどうかを見破るのもコモンズへのアップロード者の責任ですよ。明らかにExifがおかしいと確信できれば{{Invalid Exif date}}を入れます（日付の後ろに　({{Invalid Exif date}})）。外国人の旅行者が撮影した日本の写真でカメラの時刻設定が母国のままになってケースもまま見られます。昼間の写真なのに1:13AMとか。そういう場合は必要に応じて{{According to EXIF data}}を入れます（日付欄に直接入れると|location=Japanが必要になり[[Category:Japan photographs taken on ....]]の分類が正確でなくなることがあり面倒くさいので、私は日付の後に ({{According to EXIF data|}})と入れています）。撮影者でない第三者が資料としてアップロードするという意識をもっと持って下さい。この画像とか、ExifがないのにDecember 2017 in Saitama prefectureとかもう一つ信用できません。これなんかも元の撮影者がFlickrから消してしまったから真相は不明のままです。カメラの設定が間違っているかもしれないからいい加減でいいということにはなりません。--トトト (talk) 09:22, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • ({{According to EXIF data|}})などは勉強になりました。ご教授ありがとうございました。やれる範囲でやりたいと考えております。 --Benzoyl (talk) 09:29, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • 横からコメントします。Benzoylさんへ。警告:ツールのせいにして対応できないならアップロードしないでください。または対応できるだけのアップロード量にしてください。「Flickr 2 commons」はどのファイルをアップロードするか選択できるチェックボタンがあったはずですから、二次著作物などの著作権侵害ファイルは事前に排除することができるはずです。他者に無神経に尻拭いをさせる利用者とは共同作業は出来かねます。--Batholith (talk) 05:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
横からと書けば何でも書いていいもんではないですね。悪いですがあなたには今回あまり返答できませんよ。 --Benzoyl (talk) 06:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • 誰でも意見できるのがこの共同作業によるサイトですよ。それを否定されるならアウトです。関係ないことを書いた訳ではありません。「Flickr 2 commons」はあなたがトップレベルで使用されているでしょう。この件はしっかり記憶にと留めておきます。 --Batholith (talk) 09:17, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • 全然トップレベルではありません。どこソースでしょうか。もうちょっと調べてから発言して頂きたかったので、今回に関しましては距離を置きました。 --Benzoyl (talk) 09:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

で、この話題をここでしているだけではもったいないので情報共有目的で「Commons:井戸端#{{Original upload date}} 使用の推奨について」セクションを作っておきました。
この度は、貴重なご提言誠にありがとうございました。一個人でできることは限界ありますが、将来もっと簡略に撮影日情報の編集が可能になることを祈る次第です。 --Benzoyl (talk) 09:43, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Benzoylさんのファイル数がトップレベルかどうかですが、私が調べた限りでは編集回数では392,900回で95位でした。ページの作成数が156位です。ファイル数のランキングまでは私は分かりませんでしたが、ページの作成数にファイル数もカウントされていると思われ、また、Benzoylさんはカテゴリなどのページの作成より、ファイルのアップにかなり偏っていることもあり、ファイル数だけなら100位は軽く超えてくるのではないしょうか。データがないので言い切ることはできませんが、1ファイルでもアップしたユーザーを分母とすれば上位1％には十分に入ってくると思います。 --Batholith (talk) 10:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • そんな機能はなさそうです。これ以上は自分でプログラミングするしかないのでしょう。そもそもなぜ「日本語話者であるコモンズ参加者、だけに限定」する意味が分からないのですが。もし限ったとしたらトップ5には入るのでないでしょうか。Benzoylさんは24,945ファイルです。私が知る範囲でファイル数の多そうな方を挙げますと、近年ご活躍されているそらみみさんが42,160ファイル。2005から現在まで多数の自作ファイルをアップしてきた663highlandさんが26,509ファイル。山岳系のAlpsdakeさんが17,604ファイルです。私の属性が影響して地理系に偏っていますが他の分野にも多い方がいるかもしれません。
ここまで書いてやっと気が付きました。日本語話者限定という変な部分が気になるということは、Benzoylさんはファイル数を競ってらっしゃるんですね？。ですからいろいろいい加減だと。利用者のためではないと。なるほどですね。 しかしどんなに数を競っても自分で苦労して著作物を創作される方には評価では勝てませんよ。断言しておきます。--Batholith (talk) 11:57, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
逆ですよ。競ってません。日本語話者以外で大量アップロードしてるユーザーを結構見かけますよ、という話です。「カテゴリなどのページの作成より、ファイルのアップにかなり偏っている」も調べてないけど、間違ってませんかね。ソースなし類推は本当に迷惑です。 --Benzoyl (talk) 22:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Individual

Category discussion warning

Individual has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:35, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 17:00, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

archive 4

letter combinations (order)

I cannot understand the difference you meant when you created Category:ABC letter combinations (order) out of Category:ABC letter combinations. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 04:47, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I think Category:Syllabaries = order.
For example, American Broadcasting Company is Acronyms, not order.--Benzoyl (talk) 13:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry for the late reply. There may be such a case (DEF=4/5/6 & ANZ=01/14/26). But, unfortunately I'm not familiar with it.
    I suppose this category, "ABC-order" is the replacement-system A=1st, B=2nd, C=3rd, D=4th... (X=1st or 10Oct, Y=2nd or 11Nov, Z=3rd or 12Dec). Thanks. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dishes_using_parsley_of_Japan

Category discussion warning

Dishes using parsley of Japan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 02:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Groups_of_3_pieces_of_food

Category discussion warning

Groups of 3 pieces of food has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 17:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 23:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wide_open_legs_(knees_close)

Category discussion warning

Wide open legs (knees close) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 21:43, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Middle-aged_women

Category discussion warning

Middle-aged women has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 14:44, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Upskirt_in_sports

Category discussion warning

Upskirt in sports has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Genericusername57 (talk) 19:36, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 09:39, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

archive 5

Category:2_letter_alphabet_logos

Category discussion warning

2 letter alphabet logos has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:27, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

小柴ホール

こんにちは、失礼ですが、私は日本を訪れたことのある台湾人です。あなたが数年前に撮影した東京大学の写真をWikipediaで見たので、失礼ながらご連絡します。どうかお許しください。

2016年に東大を訪れ、小柴ホールの写真を撮ったことがありますが、当時は設備が悪く写真がぼやけていました https://www.flickr.com/photos/138479723@N04/albums/72177720304482625

現在、小柴ホールの展示内容が変更されているため、撮影を再開する機会がなかったのはずっと残念でした。

同じ場所を撮影した写真があれば、あなたからそれらを購入できますか？私は個人的なコレクションだけを使用しています。これは失礼な要求ですが、お許しください。

私のメッセージを読んでくれてありがとうございました。Kt Meursault (talk) 07:48, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Kt Meursault (talk · contribs)様、初めまして。この度は、とても丁寧なお便り、誠にありがとうございます。全然失礼なことではございません。
小柴ホールの写真（Category:Buildings in Hongo Campus, the University of Tokyo）ですが、残念なことに、私は一枚も所有しておりません。折角のご依頼にお力になれず申し訳ございません。
Flickrなどに、もしかしたら当該写真は存在するかもしれませんが、現状まだ発見できておりません。
引き続きご質問がございましたら、ご遠慮なく、こちらで再度お尋ねください。どうぞ今後とも宜しくお願いいたします。--Benzoyl (talk) 11:20, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Copyright_deletion_requests

Category discussion warning

Copyright deletion requests has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Gestumblindi (talk) 19:09, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 18:27, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ご来場まともにありがとうございまする

おいBenzoyl様

ご来場まともにありがとうございまする

このよるー

私の日本語はわかるのですか

あなた様は私もだいたいわかるのです

きつとあなた様はわかることだろう

ねそうでしよ

私は日本語ジヨズじやないじやない

でもほめらるるるんだよ

おいBenzoyl様

どしてあなた様はおかしいのお写真アプロドするー

あなた様のお写真来る日もまた来る日も削除されとるやん

トラの子どもやん

あるいはタカのベビであるのかもしれぬな

だがしかし怒りを持つてはならぬ

それと同時に理解せねばならぬ

慈しみやさしみ愛を持つて

正しくはげみたまえ

ありがとうございまするBenzoyl様

このよるー

--~~~~ Hand Sin Sin (talk) 10:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hand Sin Sin様。
お気遣いと温かい叱咤激励、この度は誠にありがとうございます。
近頃は色々と別件を優先し、ログインすらしておりませんでした。全くの怠慢ですね、申し訳ございません。
機会を見つけ、極力追々、また画像やカテゴリの探究に勤しみたいと思います。
今後とも何卒よろしくお願いいたします。--Benzoyl (talk) 21:34, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Three-quarter_views_of_automobiles

Category discussion warning

Three-quarter views of automobiles has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

ReneeWrites (talk) 01:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:39, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Single_stripe_flags

Category discussion warning

Single stripe flags has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

RZuo (talk) 16:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:39, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Red love hearts

Category discussion warning

Red love hearts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

El Grafo (talk) 15:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 22:06, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

archive 6

File:Ueno Okura Pink Movie Theater (9000652282).jpg

File:Ueno Okura Pink Movie Theater (9000652282).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tiptoeing_(either)

Category discussion warning

Tiptoeing (either) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Josh (talk) 00:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 07:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lipstick_(part)

Category discussion warning

Lipstick (part) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

186.174.36.44 22:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 08:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:VIDEO GAME (2986970419).jpg

File:VIDEO GAME (2986970419).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

(Oinkers42) (talk) 15:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 08:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:熊谷市 涼しさ体感アート事業 夏の空 2016 (28333606761).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:熊谷市 涼しさ体感アート事業 夏の空 2016 (28333606761).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:熊谷市 涼しさ体感アート事業 夏の空 2016 (28333606761).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

eien20 (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 10:23, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Marine art stairs in Japan.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Marine art stairs in Japan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Marine art stairs in Japan.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

eien20 (talk) 18:12, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 10:23, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:デジタルサイネージ 品川駅自由通路 2011-05-12.jpg

File:デジタルサイネージ 品川駅自由通路 2011-05-12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

186.175.60.36 02:37, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People_looking

Category discussion warning

People looking has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 13:29, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mid-aged_people

Category discussion warning

Mid-aged people has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 14:37, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Japan Obama Hiroshima (27536341375).jpg

File:Japan Obama Hiroshima (27536341375).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Consigned (talk) 13:45, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Benzoyl&oldid=901167928"