User talk:JuTa

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Revision as of 00:26, 14 April 2019 by DvorapaBot (talk | contribs) (Bot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 14 days) to User talk:JuTa/Archive 45)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Please undelete Kevin J Tracey Headshot

Hi JuTA , Can you please restore https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kevin_J._Tracey_Headshot.jpg? The copyright holder, Mike Denora, agreed to license the file. He sent an email with a written permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org a few weeks ago and just sent a follow up email. Thank you for your assistance!! --AmberGrape80 (talk) 02:11, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK ✓ Done. You forgot to place the template {{OTRS pending}} onto to file description page, which indicates that such a mail has been sent. I did that now but next time pls. try to do that yourself before the image gets deleted. regards. --JuTa 18:18, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. Thank you so much for your guidance. I greatly appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmberGrape80 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete

✓ Done --JuTa 04:19, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --JuTa 01:00, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete Lev_matematik.jpg

File:Lev_matematik.jpg is a picture of a person who lived in the 9th century. As I can see by the style of the painting, the painter probably also lived in the 9th century. So the painter is dead for well over 100 years. Pictures of flat objects (two-dimensional), like paintings, have no copyrights, because it is not an act of creativity to take such a picture. So this painting and this picture are both in the public domain. Would you please undelete this picture because there is no reason for deletion or give a good reason to delete it? JopkeB (talk) 06:21, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JopkeB, according the description page the painting was made in 2015. Many such Icons (even in old style), are modern making. I will not restore the files, but you might like to ask other admins at Commons:Undeletion requests for it. regards --JuTa 07:24, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I did not see that the painting was made in 2015, very misleading. Then I agree on deletion. JopkeB (talk) 12:00, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete Giovanni_Morassutti_by_Teresa_Marenzi-cropped.jpg

Hi JuTA , Can you please restore File:Giovanni_Morassutti_by_Teresa_Marenzi-cropped.jpg to wikiquote article? The copyright holder Teresa Marenzi agreed to license the file. She did send an email with a written permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Many thanks--Sallustinus (talk) 09:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sallustinus, I restored the file and fixed the description page. Next time please add {{OTRS pending}} yourself as soon as you know the copyright holder has sent the mail. Then the files will not get deleted quickly. regards --JuTa 14:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JuTa, Thanks for restoring the file and thanks for the advice of paying attention to {{OTRS pending}}. Best regards --Sallustinus (talk) 15:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ESA duplicates

Hi,

Could you take a careful look at the duplicate merge of File:Favignana, Levanzo e Sicilia occidental.jpg and File:Favignana, Levanzo and western Sicily ESA416961.jpg? I uploaded the latter duplicate and despite an extensive programme of generating image hashes here, this duplicate was not picked up as either a close image hash, or an identical SHA1 duplicate by the API. I now have no idea how these duplicates can possibly be created using the normal API upload process, unless something odd is failing with the API, or maybe the ESA is changing something about the jpeg image like EXIF updates. I would appreciate any feedback, as the ESA update used to be a regular weekly run, but have not been run for most of this year due to attempts to fix this apparent bug. -- (talk) 16:12, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, all I can say is: it was listed on Special:ListDuplicatedFiles and I assume the hashes were identical. Otherwise the software wouldnt list is as a duplicate. The source link was identical too. I realy appreciate your dupe checking but cannot say what went wrong here. regards. --JuTa 16:20, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Let's presume the SHA1s are identical. I'll take yet another look at the code next time I get around to wanting to run it again. It is a bizarre error considering my other batch uploads using what I believe is identical code, never has this problem. -- (talk) 16:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Apsveicu ar perfektu darbu autortiesību sargāšanā! :D Giggity2389 (talk) 10:06, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates

Hi, JuTa and thanks for all your work. In the case of the duplicates I tagged like File:Louis Hersent - Sophie Crouzet - 1943.659 - Cleveland Museum of Art.tiff, I wanted to keep the later files because they have complete information templates. Being able to do insource: searches on these files makes it much easier to categorize them. The files with only the Wikidata line in the template have to be categorized one-by-one and it’s very time-consuming and cumbersome. Is there any way I can get those back and have the earlier files with the incomplete information templates deleted instead? Thanks. —Rrburke (talk) 15:13, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, normaly the older copy of dupes get left. In the wikidata infoformation there is nothing mising comparing to the new versions, or did I miss something? I'm procesing the dupes one by one and copying the extra cats from new to the old copy. I will *not* sitch them arround because all information is there and the older copy has priority, but if you tell me which type of information is missing in the old versions I'll try to copy that over as well in future. regards. --JuTa 15:20, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply. So for example, in the case of File:Anne-Louis Girodet de Roucy-Trioson - Aurora and Cephalus - 2002.101 - Cleveland Museum of Art.tiff and File:Anne-Louis Girodet de Roucy-Trioson - Aurora and Cephalus - 2002.101 - Cleveland Museum of Art.tif, the older file has only this in the template:
== {{int:filedesc}} == {{Artwork |source=https://clevelandart.org/art/2002.101 |wikidata=Q60478354 }}
whereas the later file has all this:
=={{int:filedesc}}== {{Artwork |artist = Anne-Louis Girodet de Roucy-Trioson |author = |title = Aurora and Cephalus |description = The goddess of the dawn, Aurora, fell in love with the shepherd Cephalus. She eventually seized him at daybreak, bringing him to the heavens while he slept—the scene Girodet has painted here. Later, missing his wife, Procris, Cephalus begs to return. Aurora agrees, giving him a magic spear that kills every target, including his wife, when he mistakes her for an animal in the brush. |date = {{other date|~|1810}} |medium = {{technique|oil|canvas}} |dimensions = Framed: 34.9 x 29.9 x 7 cm (13 3/4 x 11 3/4 x 2 3/4 in.); Unframed: 22.8 x 16.8 cm (9 x 6 5/8 in.) |institution = {{institution:Cleveland Museum of Art}} |department = Modern European Painting and Sculpture |place of discovery = |object history = |object type = Painting |exhibition history = |credit line = Gift of the Painting and Drawing Society of The Cleveland Museum of Art |inscriptions = |notes = |accession number = 2002.101 |place of creation = France, 19th century |source = https://clevelandart.org/art/2002.101 |permission = |other_versions = |references = |wikidata = Q60478354 }}
That data is valuable to me in categorization, so it would be great if it could be preserved. Thanks! —Rrburke (talk) 15:28, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I realize I didn’t explain that well: The point is that I use VisualFileChange to do categorization, combining information from the different fields in the Artwork template to create more refined categories and place files in them. With the Wikidata-only files I can’t search for valuable information like place of creation = France, 19th century using an insource: search. Does that make any sense? —Rrburke (talk) 15:48, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll try to copy such informtion overin future. --JuTa 18:35, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Moin JuTa, ich hatte deinen Dupe-Antrag für File:Charles François Daubigny - Villerville Seen from Le Ratier - 1951.323 - Cleveland Museum of Art.tiff wie üblich bearbeitet, aber irgendwas ist da total schief gegangen. --Túrelio (talk) 06:29, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich war gleichzeitig dran, und hab die ältere Version behalten. Habs gefixt. --JuTa 06:31, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. Prima. Danke. --Túrelio (talk) 06:40, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Hi, sorry for bothering you, but could you have a look at this, please? :) Thanks! Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 18:21, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Allready done by someone else. --JuTa 18:24, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Commons Administrators:

Thank you for your work. We appreciate your attention to the Alan Uglow page, which is in process, and understand that you require confirmation that the images uploaded to accompany our text, for visual artist, Alan Uglow (deceased), are legitimate.

Elena Alexander is the widow of Alan Uglow. She is also Executor for the Uglow Estate and I am her Executive Assistant. Together we are caretakers of the Uglow Estate, and all information pertaining thereto, including the selection and use of images.

We respectfully request that the images (see below) be undeleted and replaced on the Alan Uglow Wikipedia page.

Thank you for your time,

Sincerely,

Geoffrey Smyth — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolgunala (talk • contribs) 21:42, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{Hi @Wolgunala: , please ask the copyright holders of the photos and paintings to send a releasing mail to the commons support team as dokumented on Commons:OTRS. thx. --JuTa 07:13, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JuTa,

Would you be able to help me with the question I've asked on the Help Desk?

It refers to a side-effect of a duplicate removal you've done in the past and in ways to recover from it and avoid it in the future.

Best Regards, --IsraelHikingMap (talk) 07:35, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no. --JuTa 09:58, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]