User talk:WolfgangRieger: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 6 thread(s) (older than 31d) to User talk:WolfgangRieger/Archive1.
 
(47 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|algo = old(31d)
|algo = old(31d)
|archive = User talk:WolfgangRieger/Archive1
|archive = User talk:WolfgangRieger/Archive1
}}
}}
-->
{{Autoarchive resolved section
{{Autoarchive resolved section
|age=1
|age=2
|archive=User talk:WolfgangRieger/Archive1
|archive=User talk:WolfgangRieger/Archive1
|level=2
|level=2
Line 10: Line 12:
}}
}}


{{Archive box | search=yes | [[/Archive]] }}
{{Archive box | search=yes | [[/Archive1]] }}


== Change file name ==
== Löschanträge ==


Könntest Du bitte [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Luftbild_Grindelhochh%C3%A4user_Hamburg.jpg&oldid=124319664 deine Löschanträge] noch erweitern? [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Files_by_Heinz-Josef_L%C3%BCcking Hier] finden sich noch ein paar hundert Bilder, die ebenfalls ein Vorlage für die Lizenz verwenden. [[User:Heinz-Josef Lücking|Heinz-Josef Lücking]] ([[User talk:Heinz-Josef Lücking|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 19:51, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Hallo Wolgang. Ich wollte dich informieren, dass ich [[:File:Pompeii - Casa del Fauno - MAN.jpg|diesen File]] mit dem falschen Name beauftragt habe neu zu benennen (''rename''). Ich bitte dich den neuen vorgeschlagener Name zu überprüfen, ob er dir passt. Sonst ändere ihn ohne weiteres, so wie du ihn gerne möchtest. Herzliche Grüsse, --[[User:DenghiùComm|DenghiùComm]] ([[User talk:DenghiùComm|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:56, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
:Schön, dass wir miteinander reden. Die anderen Uploads habe ich durchaus gesehen. Ich halte selbstgebastelte Lizenzbausteine für sehr problematisch, aber vielleicht sieht man das hier anders. Die einfachste Möglichkeit wäre, den eigenen Baustein durch den Standardbaustein zu ersetzen, und zwar in sämtlichen Uploads. Ansonsten wird man sehen, wie der DR ausgeht. Ich fände es sehr bedauerlich, wenn eine große Zahl von Bildern wegen eines konstruierten Lizensierungsproblems gelöscht werden müsste. Beste Grüße --[[User:WolfgangRieger|WolfgangRieger]] ([[User talk:WolfgangRieger#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 20:37, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
:OK. Thank you. --[[User:WolfgangRieger|WolfgangRieger]] ([[User talk:WolfgangRieger#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 09:37, 21 June 2010 (UTC)


:Hi Wolfgang, damit Deine Aktion nicht ein persönliches Geschmäckle bekommt, rege ich an, auch Löschanträge auf Bilder von Martina Nolte zu stellen, denn die werkt auch mit "persönlichen Lizenzbausteinen", vgl. [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mountain_Goats_DSCF8688.JPG]. LG [[User:Bwag|Bwag]] ([[User talk:Bwag|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 21:12, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
== Category:Ancient Roman frescos of Italy ==


::@WolfgangRieger: +1, sie *sind* problematisch. Man kann ja als WP-Textautor auch nicht daherkommen, und per selbstgebastelter Lizenz fordern, bspw. hinter jedem geschriebenen Satz namentlich in Klammern genannt zu werden. Sehe nicht, warum das bei Fotos anders sein sollte (mit Verlaub: klick-fertig; den ganzen High-End-Qualitäts-Hokuspokus brauchen bestenfalls Fotografen unter sich). Die einzig wahre Lösung ist die bei Wikidata, wo man mit jedem Edit in CC-0 einwilligt. Und das meine ich völlig unironisch. --[[User:Amga|Amga]] ([[User talk:Amga|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 22:17, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Hallo Wolfgang. Hab gesehen dass du diese Kategorie geaendert hast von "of Italy" in "in Italy". Wir haben leider in Italien ein Problem, das wir nur so loesen koennen: Kunstwerke die zu Italien gehoeren, sich aber nicht mehr in Italien oder an ihrem urspruenglichem Platz befinden. Es wird soeben alles so neu organisiert in den Categories of Italy: die generelle Kategorie wird OF sein; was sich in seinem urspruenglichem Platz befindet wird mit IN bezeichnet; was sich nun woanders befindet und versetzt worden ist wird FROM sein. Gerade Kunstwerke wie Statuen, Mosaiken, Frescos, usw von (OF) Pompeii, Herculaneum, Tivoli, Rom, usw muss man so unterscheiden muessen. Wir koennen nicht in der selben Kategorie "Frescos IN Pompeii" Fresken die sich in den Haeuser von Pompeii, in einem Saal des Museo Archeologico von Neapel, oder in einer Privat Sammlung in New York befinden, zusammen fuegen. Es ist einfach nicht korrekt! Also ich bitte dich deine Aenderungen wieder rueckgaengig zu machen, damit wir in dieser neuen Ordnung vorwaerts kommen. Herzlichen Dank dafuer! Liebe Gruesse, --[[User:DenghiùComm|DenghiùComm]] ([[User talk:DenghiùComm|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 08:54, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry, ich weiß nicht genau auf welche Seite Du Dich beziehst. Ich erinnere mich nur, dass irgendwo eine nicht existierende Supercat angegeben war. Wenn Du was rückgängig machen willst, mach nur. Grüße --[[User:WolfgangRieger|WolfgangRieger]] ([[User talk:WolfgangRieger#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:05, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
::Ok. Werde mal schauen was da passiert ist. Wahrscheinlich war die neue Cat angegeben aber noch nicht geoeffnet worden. Alles gut. Gruesse, --[[User:DenghiùComm|DenghiùComm]] ([[User talk:DenghiùComm|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 08:07, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


@Bwag: Ich habe keine Lust, Massenlöschanträge zu stellen. Aber in der Tat würde für alle Bilder mit Extrawurst-Lizenz im Prinzip das gleiche gelten: entweder entschließt sich der Urheber, den Gepflogenheiten zu folgen, oder sie gehören gelöscht. Zwar sicherlich schade, aber letztlich IMHO im Zweifelsfall unumgänglich. --[[User:WolfgangRieger|WolfgangRieger]] ([[User talk:WolfgangRieger#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 22:29, 18 May 2014 (UTC)


:Natürlich hast Du faktisch einen Massenlöschantrag aus heitrem Himmel heraus gestellt, der ohne Not Wikipediartikeln die Bilder entziehen kann und Usern ausserhalb der Wikipedia die Möglichkeit nimmt, diese Bilder zu nutzen. Denn die Lizeneinbindung ist nicht nur einmal vorhanden.
== [[:File:Pompeii - Terme Suburbane - Apodyterium - Scene VI.jpg]] ==
:An der Einbindung der von [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Cc-by-sa-3.0-de Commons bereitetgestellten Vorlage] für die Einbindung der CC Lizenz [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/legalcode Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschland] mit Nennung der Attribute ist nicht Extrawurstiges drann zu erkennen "''Namensnennung – Du musst den Namen des Autors/Rechteinhabers in der von ihm festgelegten Weise nennen ''"). Nenne doch bitte die konkreten Textpassagen aus der Lizenz so dass deine Behauptungen nicht wie eine dahergezaubertes Extrawurst erscheinen. Deine Begründung für deinen Löschantrag wurde übrigens von Túrelio in die Extrawurst-Tonne getreten "To avoid further misinterpretations: 1) the original (unspecific) deletion rationale is per se not valid. (many users have individual "license templates");" Du hast dich null mit der Lizenz beschäftigt und lediglich ohne Ahnung aus einem persönlichen Affekt heraus einen Löschantrag gestellt. Aus der Löschdiskussion geflissentlich hälst du dich dabei auch noch pikfein heraus.
:Und Extrawurst? Verteilt die Wikipedia Extrawürste? Nein. Die Wikipedia wird mit Extrawürsten zugeschüttet in Form von Spendengelder und freier Arbeit Aussenstehender, die dafür null Pfennig sehen. Und falls Du über die Spendengelder auch noch finanziell über deine Admintätigkeit heraus eingebunden sein solltest, dann bist Du hier der einzige dem irgendwelche Extrawürste zufliegen. [[User:Heinz-Josef Lücking|Heinz-Josef Lücking]] ([[User talk:Heinz-Josef Lücking|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 12:38, 19 May 2014 (UTC)


Das sind keine selbstgebastelten Lizenzen sondern Erklärungen und Erweiterungen, alles hier weit verbreitet und üblich. In meinen Augen ist das nichts weiter als BNS. --[[user:Ralf Roletschek|Ralf Roleček]] 15:47, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
{{autotranslate|base=No tag message whitetemplate}}


== [[:File:Tarot de Marseille thumb major.jpg]] ==
''This message was '''added automatically by [[User:Nikbot|Nikbot]]''', if you need some help about it, ask its master ([[User:Filnik/License missing|Filnik]]) or go to the [[Commons:Help desk]]''. --[[User:Filnik/License missing|Filnik]] 17:54, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
{{Section resolved|1=[[User:WolfgangRieger|WolfgangRieger]] ([[User talk:WolfgangRieger#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)}}
{{Autotranslate|1=File:Tarot de Marseille thumb major.jpg|2=|3=|base=Idw}} &#160;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:90%;">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 12:42, 26 July 2016 (UTC)


== {{Autotranslate|base=Idw/heading}} ==
== [[:File:Pompeii - Terme Suburbane - Apodyterium - Scene V.jpg]] ==
{{Autotranslate|1=|2=Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid|3=plural|base=Idw}}
Affected:
* [[:File:Louvre pyramid - blackout.jpg]]


{{autotranslate|base=No tag message whitetemplate}}


Yours sincerely [[User:EugeneZelenko|EugeneZelenko]] ([[User talk:EugeneZelenko|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 14:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
''This message was '''added automatically by [[User:Nikbot|Nikbot]]''', if you need some help about it, ask its master ([[User:Filnik/License missing|Filnik]]) or go to the [[Commons:Help desk]]''. --[[User:Filnik/License missing|Filnik]] 17:55, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
{{Section resolved|1=[[User:WolfgangRieger|WolfgangRieger]] ([[User talk:WolfgangRieger#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)}}


== [[:File:Pompeii - Terme Suburbane - Apodyterium - Scene IV.jpg]] ==
== [[:File:SFOD-D Patch.svg]] ==
{{Autotranslate|1=File:SFOD-D Patch.svg|2=|3=|base=Idw}} [[User:Jcb|Jcb]] ([[User talk:Jcb|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 13:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


== Kameraposition ==
{{autotranslate|base=No tag message whitetemplate}}


Hallo Wolfgang, ich beobachte, dass du immer wieder die Kameraposition bei Bildbeschreibungen einträgst. Die Objektposition einzutragen halte ich für sinnvoll (danke dafür), aber die Kameraposition in den meisten Fällen nicht. Genaue Angaben kann letztlich nur der Fotograf selber machen, und ungenaue Angaben kann man sich auch sparen, wie z.B. bei ''Baumstr. 11 Muenchen-4.jpg''. Herzliche Grüße --[[User:Rufus46|Rufus46]] ([[User talk:Rufus46|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
''This message was '''added automatically by [[User:Nikbot|Nikbot]]''', if you need some help about it, ask its master ([[User:Filnik/License missing|Filnik]]) or go to the [[Commons:Help desk]]''. --[[User:Filnik/License missing|Filnik]] 17:56, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
:Sehe ich anders. Eine ungefähre, auf wenige Meter genaue Kameraposition sagt etwas über die Aufnahmeperspektive. Außerdem kann der Fotograf (im genannten Beispiel Du) jederzeit eine genauere Position eintragen. Und schließlich zeigen Tools wie [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikishootme wikishootme] die Kameraposition und nicht die Objektposition an, das Ziel meiner Edits ist aber, Commons-Bilder mit solchen Tools besser auffindbar zu machen. --[[User:WolfgangRieger|WolfgangRieger]] ([[User talk:WolfgangRieger#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
{{Section resolved|1=[[User:WolfgangRieger|WolfgangRieger]] ([[User talk:WolfgangRieger#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)}}


== Roman Fresco Villa dei Misteri Pompeii ==
== [[:File:Pompeii - Terme Suburbane - Apodyterium - Scene III.jpg]] ==


Hi Wolfgang, do you have a high-resolution copy of this image? I'm writing on behalf of Trinity University Press, and we'd like to use this image for a book about art that we're currently publishing, but we can't use JPEG format. {{unsigned2|20:22, 15 February 2018|Isaiah Mitchell}}
{{autotranslate|base=No tag message whitetemplate}}
--[[User:Isaiah Mitchell|Isaiah Mitchell]] ([[User talk:Isaiah Mitchell|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 20:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
:Which file are you talking about? Please give precise name/URL. --[[User:WolfgangRieger|WolfgangRieger]] ([[User talk:WolfgangRieger#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 22:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)


[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Roman_fresco_Villa_dei_Misteri_Pompeii_008.jpg The Roman Fresco Villa dei Misteri Pompeii 008] --[[User:Isaiah Mitchell|Isaiah Mitchell]] ([[User talk:Isaiah Mitchell|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 22:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
''This message was '''added automatically by [[User:Nikbot|Nikbot]]''', if you need some help about it, ask its master ([[User:Filnik/License missing|Filnik]]) or go to the [[Commons:Help desk]]''. --[[User:Filnik/License missing|Filnik]] 17:57, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
{{Section resolved|1=[[User:WolfgangRieger|WolfgangRieger]] ([[User talk:WolfgangRieger#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)}}
:As can be seen from the source info, this is a scan from a book. If the quality of the file is not sufficient, I advise to get the book and do your own scan. However, the resolution would allow for 7.1in width at 300 dpi. --[[User:WolfgangRieger|WolfgangRieger]] ([[User talk:WolfgangRieger#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 22:40, 15 February 2018 (UTC)


== Jean-Claude Flornoy Tarot ==
== [[:File:Pompeii - Terme Suburbane - Apodyterium - Scene VII.jpg]] ==


{{autotranslate|base=No tag message whitetemplate}}


== {{Autotranslate|base=Idw/heading}} ==
''This message was '''added automatically by [[User:Nikbot|Nikbot]]''', if you need some help about it, ask its master ([[User:Filnik/License missing|Filnik]]) or go to the [[Commons:Help desk]]''. --[[User:Filnik/License missing|Filnik]] 18:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
{{Section resolved|1=[[User:WolfgangRieger|WolfgangRieger]] ([[User talk:WolfgangRieger#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)}}
{{Autotranslate|1=|2=Jean-Claude Flornoy Tarot|3=plural|base=Idw}} [[User:Thomas Linard|Thomas Linard]] ([[User talk:Thomas Linard|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:36, 18 June 2018 (UTC)


== Tarot © Maritxu De Guler, 1983 ==
== [[:File:Pompeii - Terme Suburbane - Apodyterium - Naked Poet.jpg]] ==


{{autotranslate|base=No tag message whitetemplate}}


== {{Autotranslate|base=Idw/heading}} ==
''This message was '''added automatically by [[User:Nikbot|Nikbot]]''', if you need some help about it, ask its master ([[User:Filnik/License missing|Filnik]]) or go to the [[Commons:Help desk]]''. --[[User:Filnik/License missing|Filnik]] 18:22, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
{{Section resolved|1=[[User:WolfgangRieger|WolfgangRieger]] ([[User talk:WolfgangRieger#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)}}
{{Autotranslate|1=|2=Tarot © Maritxu De Guler, 1983|3=plural|base=Idw}} [[User:Thomas Linard|Thomas Linard]] ([[User talk:Thomas Linard|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

== {{Autotranslate|base=Idw/heading}} ==
{{Autotranslate|1=|2=Files in Category:Tarot de Marseille (recolored)|3=plural|base=Idw}}
Affected:
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille clubs01.jpg]]

And also:
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille clubs02.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille clubs03.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille clubs04.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille clubs05.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille clubs06.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille clubs07.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille clubs08.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille clubs09.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille clubs10.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille clubs11 page.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille clubs12 knight.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille clubs13 queen.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille clubs14 king.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille coins01.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille coins02.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille coins03.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille coins04.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille coins05.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille coins06.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille coins07.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille coins08.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille coins09.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille coins10.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille coins11 page.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille coins12 knight.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille coins13 queen.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille coins14 king.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille cups01.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille cups02.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille cups03.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille cups04.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille cups05.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille cups06.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille cups07.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille cups08.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille cups09.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille cups10.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille cups11 page.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille cups12 knight.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille cups13 queen.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille cups14 king.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major00 fool.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major01 magician.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major02 high priestess.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major03 empress.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major04 emperor.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major05 hierophant.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major06 lovers.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major07 chariot.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major08 justice.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major09 hermit.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major10 wheel.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major11 strength.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major12 hanged man.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major13 death.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major14 temperance.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major15 devil.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major16 tower.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major17 star.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major18 moon.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major19 sun.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major20 judgement.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille major21 world.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille swords01.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille swords02.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille swords03.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille swords04.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille swords05.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille swords06.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille swords07.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille swords08.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille swords09.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille swords10.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille swords11 page.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille swords12 knight.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille swords13 queen.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille swords14 king.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille thumb clubs.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille thumb coins.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille thumb cups.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille thumb major.jpg]]
* [[:File:Tarot de Marseille thumb swords.jpg]]

Yours sincerely, [[User:Thomas Linard|Thomas Linard]] ([[User talk:Thomas Linard|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 14:09, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

== {{Autotranslate|base=Idw/heading}} ==
{{Autotranslate|1=|2=Files in Category:Hans Gottfried von Stockhausen|3=plural|base=Idw}}
Affected:
* [[:File:Bad Hersfeld - Stadtkirche - 02.JPG]]


Yours sincerely, [[User:Rosenzweig|<span style="color:#0000CD">Rosenzweig</span>]] [[User talk:Rosenzweig|<span style="color:#8D38C9">'''''τ'''''</span>]] 20:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

== {{Autotranslate|base=Filemovermessage/header/i18n}} ==

{{Autotranslate|base=Filemovermessage/i18n}} --[[User:Majora|Majora]] ([[User talk:Majora|talk]]) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Majora@commonswiki using the list at https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File_movers&oldid=373181849 -->

== {{Autotranslate|base=Idw/heading}} ==
{{Autotranslate|1=|2=Files in Category:Blacked out versions of images relying on FoP in France|3=plural|base=Idw}}
Affected:
* [[:File:Europäisches Parlament Strassburg - Blackout.jpg]]


Yours sincerely, <span style="font-family:Footlight MT">[[User:JWilz12345|JWilz12345]] <span style="background-color:#68FCF1">(''[[User talk:JWilz12345|Talk]]''|''[[Special:Contributions/JWilz12345|Contrib's.]]'')</span></span> 05:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

== Why is this self-censorship? ==

[[:File:Pompeii - Osteria della Via di Mercurio - Erotic Scene 2.jpg]], [[:File:Pompeii - Osteria della Via di Mercurio - Erotic Scene - Print 2.jpg]]. Please add a detailed explanation to the caption or this category may be removed as unjustified. --[[User:Lochost of China|Lochost of China]] ([[User talk:Lochost of China|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 04:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
:Read the description of the second file and look at the usage. --[[User:WolfgangRieger|WolfgangRieger]] ([[User talk:WolfgangRieger#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 06:52, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
::I see an example of censorship, but why is it self-censorship? --[[User:Lochost of China|Lochost of China]] ([[User talk:Lochost of China|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 06:48, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

== [[:File:First Fandom Patch.jpg]] ==
{{Autotranslate|1=File:First Fandom Patch.jpg|2=|3=|base=Idw}} [[User:Susmuffin|Susmuffin]] ([[User talk:Susmuffin|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 04:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

== {{Autotranslate|base=Idw/heading}} ==
{{Autotranslate|1=|2=Files in Category:Karl Hans Walter|3=plural|base=Idw}}
Affected:
* [[:File:Pappenheim Stamp 1954.jpg]]


Yours sincerely, [[User:Adamant1|Adamant1]] ([[User talk:Adamant1|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 05:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:38, 11 September 2023

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 2 days.

Löschanträge

[edit]

Könntest Du bitte deine Löschanträge noch erweitern? Hier finden sich noch ein paar hundert Bilder, die ebenfalls ein Vorlage für die Lizenz verwenden. Heinz-Josef Lücking (talk) 19:51, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Schön, dass wir miteinander reden. Die anderen Uploads habe ich durchaus gesehen. Ich halte selbstgebastelte Lizenzbausteine für sehr problematisch, aber vielleicht sieht man das hier anders. Die einfachste Möglichkeit wäre, den eigenen Baustein durch den Standardbaustein zu ersetzen, und zwar in sämtlichen Uploads. Ansonsten wird man sehen, wie der DR ausgeht. Ich fände es sehr bedauerlich, wenn eine große Zahl von Bildern wegen eines konstruierten Lizensierungsproblems gelöscht werden müsste. Beste Grüße --WolfgangRieger (talk) 20:37, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Wolfgang, damit Deine Aktion nicht ein persönliches Geschmäckle bekommt, rege ich an, auch Löschanträge auf Bilder von Martina Nolte zu stellen, denn die werkt auch mit "persönlichen Lizenzbausteinen", vgl. [1]. LG Bwag (talk) 21:12, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@WolfgangRieger: +1, sie *sind* problematisch. Man kann ja als WP-Textautor auch nicht daherkommen, und per selbstgebastelter Lizenz fordern, bspw. hinter jedem geschriebenen Satz namentlich in Klammern genannt zu werden. Sehe nicht, warum das bei Fotos anders sein sollte (mit Verlaub: klick-fertig; den ganzen High-End-Qualitäts-Hokuspokus brauchen bestenfalls Fotografen unter sich). Die einzig wahre Lösung ist die bei Wikidata, wo man mit jedem Edit in CC-0 einwilligt. Und das meine ich völlig unironisch. --Amga (talk) 22:17, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Bwag: Ich habe keine Lust, Massenlöschanträge zu stellen. Aber in der Tat würde für alle Bilder mit Extrawurst-Lizenz im Prinzip das gleiche gelten: entweder entschließt sich der Urheber, den Gepflogenheiten zu folgen, oder sie gehören gelöscht. Zwar sicherlich schade, aber letztlich IMHO im Zweifelsfall unumgänglich. --WolfgangRieger (talk) 22:29, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Natürlich hast Du faktisch einen Massenlöschantrag aus heitrem Himmel heraus gestellt, der ohne Not Wikipediartikeln die Bilder entziehen kann und Usern ausserhalb der Wikipedia die Möglichkeit nimmt, diese Bilder zu nutzen. Denn die Lizeneinbindung ist nicht nur einmal vorhanden.
An der Einbindung der von Commons bereitetgestellten Vorlage für die Einbindung der CC Lizenz Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschland mit Nennung der Attribute ist nicht Extrawurstiges drann zu erkennen "Namensnennung – Du musst den Namen des Autors/Rechteinhabers in der von ihm festgelegten Weise nennen "). Nenne doch bitte die konkreten Textpassagen aus der Lizenz so dass deine Behauptungen nicht wie eine dahergezaubertes Extrawurst erscheinen. Deine Begründung für deinen Löschantrag wurde übrigens von Túrelio in die Extrawurst-Tonne getreten "To avoid further misinterpretations: 1) the original (unspecific) deletion rationale is per se not valid. (many users have individual "license templates");" Du hast dich null mit der Lizenz beschäftigt und lediglich ohne Ahnung aus einem persönlichen Affekt heraus einen Löschantrag gestellt. Aus der Löschdiskussion geflissentlich hälst du dich dabei auch noch pikfein heraus.
Und Extrawurst? Verteilt die Wikipedia Extrawürste? Nein. Die Wikipedia wird mit Extrawürsten zugeschüttet in Form von Spendengelder und freier Arbeit Aussenstehender, die dafür null Pfennig sehen. Und falls Du über die Spendengelder auch noch finanziell über deine Admintätigkeit heraus eingebunden sein solltest, dann bist Du hier der einzige dem irgendwelche Extrawürste zufliegen. Heinz-Josef Lücking (talk) 12:38, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Das sind keine selbstgebastelten Lizenzen sondern Erklärungen und Erweiterungen, alles hier weit verbreitet und üblich. In meinen Augen ist das nichts weiter als BNS. --Ralf Roleček 15:47, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tarot de Marseille thumb major.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 12:42, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:SFOD-D Patch.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 13:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kameraposition

[edit]

Hallo Wolfgang, ich beobachte, dass du immer wieder die Kameraposition bei Bildbeschreibungen einträgst. Die Objektposition einzutragen halte ich für sinnvoll (danke dafür), aber die Kameraposition in den meisten Fällen nicht. Genaue Angaben kann letztlich nur der Fotograf selber machen, und ungenaue Angaben kann man sich auch sparen, wie z.B. bei Baumstr. 11 Muenchen-4.jpg. Herzliche Grüße --Rufus46 (talk) 09:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sehe ich anders. Eine ungefähre, auf wenige Meter genaue Kameraposition sagt etwas über die Aufnahmeperspektive. Außerdem kann der Fotograf (im genannten Beispiel Du) jederzeit eine genauere Position eintragen. Und schließlich zeigen Tools wie wikishootme die Kameraposition und nicht die Objektposition an, das Ziel meiner Edits ist aber, Commons-Bilder mit solchen Tools besser auffindbar zu machen. --WolfgangRieger (talk) 09:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Fresco Villa dei Misteri Pompeii

[edit]

Hi Wolfgang, do you have a high-resolution copy of this image? I'm writing on behalf of Trinity University Press, and we'd like to use this image for a book about art that we're currently publishing, but we can't use JPEG format. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isaiah Mitchell (talk • contribs) 20:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC) --Isaiah Mitchell (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which file are you talking about? Please give precise name/URL. --WolfgangRieger (talk) 22:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Roman Fresco Villa dei Misteri Pompeii 008 --Isaiah Mitchell (talk) 22:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As can be seen from the source info, this is a scan from a book. If the quality of the file is not sufficient, I advise to get the book and do your own scan. However, the resolution would allow for 7.1in width at 300 dpi. --WolfgangRieger (talk) 22:40, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Claude Flornoy Tarot

[edit]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thomas Linard (talk) 09:36, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tarot © Maritxu De Guler, 1983

[edit]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thomas Linard (talk) 09:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Thomas Linard (talk) 14:09, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this self-censorship?

[edit]

File:Pompeii - Osteria della Via di Mercurio - Erotic Scene 2.jpg, File:Pompeii - Osteria della Via di Mercurio - Erotic Scene - Print 2.jpg. Please add a detailed explanation to the caption or this category may be removed as unjustified. --Lochost of China (talk) 04:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Read the description of the second file and look at the usage. --WolfgangRieger (talk) 06:52, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I see an example of censorship, but why is it self-censorship? --Lochost of China (talk) 06:48, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:First Fandom Patch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Susmuffin (talk) 04:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 05:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]